Blue_Mike
Full Member
Meet Hanako At Embers
Posts: 5,408
|
Post by Blue_Mike on May 5, 2022 23:01:31 GMT
Game Of Thrones Prequel. Starts August 21st.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on May 15, 2022 0:32:19 GMT
I rather miss the 'event tv' that was Game of Thrones. It was kinda cool to have half the world tuning in at the same time to find out who died this week.
That said, I wonder how much the 'readers vs non-readers' split helped it. There was a vicarious pleasure in encouraging your non-reader friends to tune in when you knew their favorite characters were about to get slaughtered.
I very much doubt I'll care much about the prequel, and there won't be that same factor.
|
|
Blue_Mike
Full Member
Meet Hanako At Embers
Posts: 5,408
|
Post by Blue_Mike on May 15, 2022 0:41:04 GMT
I rather miss the 'event tv' that was Game of Thrones. It was kinda cool to have half the world tuning in at the same time to find out who died this week. That said, I wonder how much the 'readers vs non-readers' split helped it. There was a vicarious pleasure in encouraging your non-reader friends to tune in when you knew their favorite characters were about to get slaughtered. I very much doubt I'll care much about the prequel, and there won't be that same factor. There have been very few shows that I felt that sort of sense of community involvement in. Lost was a big one when it first started, me and the Uni friends would gather round and analyse the hell out of every episode up until the end of season 4, then Uni finished and we all went our seperate ways and I really missed that. Although the way Lost went after that season, perhaps it was for the best.
|
|
|
Post by ToomuchFluffy on May 15, 2022 9:05:55 GMT
GRRM mentioned something on a recent blog post, but admittedly the only thing I really noticed was something along the lines of "Winds of Winter will be long and yes, yes I'm still working on it".
Not that I really should care considering how slowly I have been reading other things in recent times, but still, would be nice if he actually managed to finish off the whole thing.
|
|
|
Post by Vandelay on May 15, 2022 9:48:57 GMT
I expect GRRM has spent the last couple of years frantically (or as frantic as he can be) re-planning his ending so that he can distance it from the TV ending.
Can't actually remember how many of the books I've actually read it has been so long, but it would be good if he can actually get it finished.
Quite looking forward to House of Dragon, although with trepidation. It would be great to have another big fantasy epic TV show to look forward to. The Witcher was a bit dull and I haven't bothered with season 2. I didn't mind Wheel of Time, but the final episode was terrible. That just leaves hope with the Lord of the Rings one and this.
HoD appeals slightly more to me, but I expect it will have to be one of the best things ever made to get people back onboard after the GoT backlash.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on May 16, 2022 23:48:06 GMT
Who is writing HoD?
I assume it's not the GoT showrunners? GoT's quality tanked as soon as they overtook the books. So on the one hand, if it's not by them then that's a positive sign, but on the other hand, it's not by GRRM so that's a negative one.
|
|
MolarAm🔵
Full Member
Bad at games
Posts: 6,874
Member is Online
|
Post by MolarAm🔵 on May 16, 2022 23:58:49 GMT
The books are never going to get finished, so I guess this is all we'll get.
I might give this a watch if the reviews are good, but otherwise I'm not particularly pumped for it. Even if GoT didn't completely shit the bed in the last few seasons, I'm just not that interested in the Targaryens.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on May 17, 2022 0:06:05 GMT
I had no interest in the GoT spin offs when they were announced, and when GoT ended. Also no real interest in the Targaryens. But I guess enough time has now passed that I'm kinda up for a GoT style experience again. I don't imagine it'll be as big as GoT was though, and half the fun of that was that everyone was watching it.
This thread has reminded me that The Witcher Season 2 is a thing though, so I guess I should remember to watch that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2022 0:07:09 GMT
Yeah, HBO has to pair it with some other shit to get me to give this a chance. Like if Larry returns with Curb Season 12 or if Marty and Terry develop another mafia show I'll check it out, but I'm not a Targaryen fan, and nevermind the ending, GoT lost me at all the Ramsey/Sansa shit.
|
|
JYM60
New Member
Posts: 606
|
Post by JYM60 on May 18, 2022 12:24:42 GMT
I thought the Ramsey arc was the last decent one in the show tbh.
Trailer for this looks ok. Not massively interested in the Targaryens either, but may give it a look.
|
|
Blue_Mike
Full Member
Meet Hanako At Embers
Posts: 5,408
|
Post by Blue_Mike on May 18, 2022 12:33:10 GMT
I'm reasonably sure the rug Matt Smith is wearing in some scenes in the trailer is the same exact one worn by Harry Lloyd as Viserys in season 1 of GoT.
|
|
|
Post by Duffking on May 18, 2022 14:21:45 GMT
Ultimately this was the show's downfall, from season 5 or so on onward it felt like the only thing the show was interested in - whizz through all the boring plot stuff and then lets kill someone off except for the increasingly obvious plot armour people.
Which doesn't really work, all the painstaking plotting was why those shocks meant anything in the first place.
At least D&D aren't involved in this. Thanks for 3.5 seasons of good telly at least. I'd argue the show's quality dropped before it overtook the books; S4 made a lot of dubious decisions and the original parts of it were very, very edgelord-y. I don't get why people think it only fell off in S7/8, it was dire from 5 onward.
|
|
|
Post by Duffking on May 18, 2022 14:26:19 GMT
I expect GRRM has spent the last couple of years frantically (or as frantic as he can be) re-planning his ending so that he can distance it from the TV ending. The show's ending isn't fundamentally bad in its own right though, it's just thoroughly badly told and generally un-earned. And in its (very very mild defense), though it was done badly, I disagree that the heel turn at the end came out of nowhere as many seem to think. That was one of the only actual bits of foreshadowing that they bothered to do for the most part, it was patently obvious it was possibly going to happen for years.
|
|
JYM60
New Member
Posts: 606
|
Post by JYM60 on May 18, 2022 15:10:27 GMT
Oh yeah, it was blatantly obvious. I think it was the building of it not happening which was rushed and forced if anything.
|
|
|
Post by Vandelay on May 18, 2022 15:49:01 GMT
I expect GRRM has spent the last couple of years frantically (or as frantic as he can be) re-planning his ending so that he can distance it from the TV ending. The show's ending isn't fundamentally bad in its own right though, it's just thoroughly badly told and generally un-earned. And in its (very very mild defense), though it was done badly, I disagree that the heel turn at the end came out of nowhere as many seem to think. That was one of the only actual bits of foreshadowing that they bothered to do for the most part, it was patently obvious it was possibly going to happen for years. I totally agree. I never understood the complaints about what actually happened, although the complaints about how it happened are mostly fair. I was mostly a defender of the ending as I thought the hysteria was overblown. I would also say the final season was actually better than 7, although neither was good. Regardless of my own opinions though, I still wouldn't be surprised if GRRM decides to change bits of it so that he can distance himself from the TV ending.
|
|
|
Post by Duffking on May 18, 2022 15:55:25 GMT
A lot of the dumbest stuff could have been easily avoided too. Like the whole "Dany kind of forgot about the iron fleet" thing. They could easily have done "Dany didn't see the Iron Fleet as a legitimate thread and put her focus elsewhere and paid the price for it" or something.
One of the thing that bothered me the most is the teleporting around getting more and more blatant toward the end. I get they wanted to move the story on, but it doesn't really work for me when the setup for literally the most shocking thing in the entire series is "I'm not allowed to walk my army over this bridge unless I get married to the owner's daughter". It kind of invalidates all of that sort of stuff that made the first few seasons so interesting.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on May 19, 2022 5:02:12 GMT
One of the thing that bothered me the most is the teleporting around getting more and more blatant toward the end. I get they wanted to move the story on, but it doesn't really work for me when the setup for literally the most shocking thing in the entire series is "I'm not allowed to walk my army over this bridge unless I get married to the owner's daughter". It kind of invalidates all of that sort of stuff that made the first few seasons so interesting. This is true. Though it's another symptom of the last season or two just being waaay too rushed. The way the books and the early series made huge distances a big issue, and had them cause huge problems with news travelling, was a large influence on the stories they told. There were big sections where some massive event had happened, but people in another storyline hadn't got any idea about it and so were blindly doing something dumb. Once they got rid of that, they were just knowingly doing something dumb. When you're willing to shockingly kill off major characters out of the blue, you have to walk a very fine line between doing it too much, so that it becomes entirely random and therefore meaningless, and not doing it enough, so it becomes clear that some characters have major plot armour. The thing I kinda liked about the books was the idea that everyone was vulnerable. You might be this baddass knight, or have spent 6 years plotting, but one lucky grunt might get in a lucky blow and you might end up dying ignominiously from sepsis. Maybe it was inevitable that as the story needed to reach its climax the key players for the end game would become clear and have to survive, but it also made it much more predictable and generic. I guess they were worried about the issue of killing off too many favorites leaving them without enough popular characters. But they exacerbated that by cutting out too many side characters that *could* have been brought in and killed off as red herrings. Which meant they ended up keeping around too many characters well past their usefulness (Bronn, Varys, etc..) I think I kinda misread GRRM's message with the books. I felt like he was saying that all the kings, lords, etc.. were basically as bad as each other for the poor folk. But it turned out that he was saying that some of them were actually pure and destined to be heroes. The Cleganebowl stuff, for example, felt like something out of an entirely different franchise. What happened to Cersi and Jamie, while seemingly hated by most of the fans, seemed much more in keeping with the spirit of the show. (though not the stuff with Euron, which was totally rushed and unearned)
|
|
MolarAm🔵
Full Member
Bad at games
Posts: 6,874
Member is Online
|
Post by MolarAm🔵 on May 19, 2022 5:16:57 GMT
The most irritating fucking thing for me was, in a series that allegedly valued ruthless-but-effective realist leaders over the well-meaning-but-naive kind, they never worked up the guts to actually kill Jon Snow, the worst military commander ever. He gets countless, *countless* people killed for no reason, yet always fails upwards. He even gets killed once (the correct result), but nope it doesn't stick.
He didn't even get good advisors, because they turned Tyrion into a fucking idiot too. They're the reason the zombie king got a dragon ffs.
|
|
Frog
Full Member
Posts: 7,304
|
Post by Frog on May 19, 2022 6:13:45 GMT
Jon is still dead in the books and I'm pretty sure that he was due to stay dead. It's only because he was such a huge fan favourite in the TV series that he got resurrected.
|
|
MolarAm🔵
Full Member
Bad at games
Posts: 6,874
Member is Online
|
Post by MolarAm🔵 on May 19, 2022 6:20:35 GMT
I think a lot of things that happened in the series, happened because the fans wanted it.
Which was terrible, because a lot of the time fans want shit things that make no sense. Like Arya getting the bone from Gendry.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 19, 2022 6:26:45 GMT
I still think the ending would have been fine if they'd just stretched out what happened over 2 seasons. I never bought into the idea that the earlier series where some super complex work of genius. They were tits and swords with the added hook that it didn't mind killing main characters so the simplistic ending largely felt like it fit to me.
|
|
MolarAm🔵
Full Member
Bad at games
Posts: 6,874
Member is Online
|
Post by MolarAm🔵 on May 19, 2022 6:44:49 GMT
I still think the ending would have been fine if they'd just stretched out what happened over 2 seasons. I never bought into the idea that the earlier series where some super complex work of genius. They were tits and swords with the added hook that it didn't mind killing main characters so the simplistic ending largely felt like it fit to me. Sort of. I agree that the show was never really this towering masterpiece of storytelling. But I think the thing that a lot of people (including me) liked about the earlier seasons was the politics and conniving and plotting, most of which happened in the southern bits of the world. The further north you went, the more boring it got. Obviously all the political stuff had to go when the zombies came over the wall. But personally I still missed it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 19, 2022 6:49:36 GMT
Even the politics stuff was basically everyone is out for themselves except the honourable Starks. And then Littlefinger did a face.
|
|
|
Post by Vandelay on May 19, 2022 7:43:22 GMT
But I think the thing that a lot of people (including me) liked about the earlier seasons was the politics and conniving and plotting, most of which happened in the southern bits of the world. The further north you went, the more boring it got. Obviously all the political stuff had to go when the zombies came over the wall. But personally I still missed it. Don't think it is necessarily true that the politics stuff had to go when the zombies passed the wall. The whole point of the zombie stuff was this encroaching disaster that no one takes seriously until it is too late. And they still could have including more politicing with what they did, as the south was basically like, "nah, you got this north. We will leave it to you". One of the biggest failings of the final season was giving Cersi bugger all to do, besides drinking wine in her tower. We should have seen her continuing to try to retain power, all while this unstoppable force edged ever closer to King's Landing. And they are vindicated in that decision, as the Night King is defeated and never reaches King's Landing. If you had of had Cersi struggling to retain her power, you could then also have Danni see the weakness and decide "actually, power is what I want and King's Landing is where I get it. Screw you guys, I'm taking my army South". I reckon that would have felt like a more believable realisation of her actually not being very nice rather than suddenly deciding to burn civilians. Probably obvious, but the final battle with the Night King taking place at King's Landing and them losing to the inevitable force they have been ignoring for all these years is the most logical ending. Maybe have a few survivors and frame it as the fight goes on, but the political games and battling for power was never the answer.
|
|
MolarAm🔵
Full Member
Bad at games
Posts: 6,874
Member is Online
|
Post by MolarAm🔵 on May 19, 2022 8:01:45 GMT
Well, regardless of whether the politics had to go or not, it did. It probably died with Littlefinger (who tbf felt like he'd really outlived his usefulness long before)
|
|
MolarAm🔵
Full Member
Bad at games
Posts: 6,874
Member is Online
|
Post by MolarAm🔵 on May 19, 2022 8:02:51 GMT
Should we have spoilers for the main series here? Surely most people considering watching this would be caught up?
(he says after spoiling the deaths of several major characters)
|
|
|
Post by dfunked on May 19, 2022 8:06:05 GMT
Does seem kind of obvious that here be spoilers, but maybe no harm in editing the title or something.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,661
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on May 19, 2022 8:10:46 GMT
The problem they had was initially carrying on like they had 20 years to complete everything so they had to fit two pints into a pint pot by the end. I know everyone loved how faithful it initially was but they needed to trim a lot of shit out of those first few series.
|
|
|
Post by Duffking on May 19, 2022 8:28:37 GMT
The most irritating fucking thing for me was, in a series that allegedly valued ruthless-but-effective realist leaders over the well-meaning-but-naive kind, they never worked up the guts to actually kill Jon Snow, the worst military commander ever. He gets countless, *countless* people killed for no reason, yet always fails upwards. He even gets killed once (the correct result), but nope it doesn't stick. He didn't even get good advisors, because they turned Tyrion into a fucking idiot too. They're the reason the zombie king got a dragon ffs. You've landed on another big issue with the show, which is that from parts of S4 and S5 onward, in order to generate drama and watercooler moments they made everyone dumb as shit with no repurcussions in the actual show.
In the first few seasons, doing something dumb meant a character's undoing.
After S4, there's this cognitive dissonance where everyone does dumb shit all the time but the show is telling us they aren't. Every single person on Jons side at the Battle of Winterfell is a fucking moron, not because they want us to think they're dumb, but because they wanted drama on screen. Almost everyone just becomes dumb as shit just to move people into the right place to get killed for youtube reaction videos.
Sansa and Arya were some of the worst for this; we're supposed to believe that Sansa morphed into some kind of game playing Cersei-lite genius, but it doesn't work because a) Cersei is dumb as shit and is actually supposed to be, b) nothing really happens to her that would give her much of an opportunity to develop in that way and c) she never does anything smart after the point she's supposed to be "smart" now, people just tell us she is and we're supposed to believe it.
Meanwhile you've got Arya, whose character development in Braavos was 1) decide you want to be an assassin, 2) fail miserably at assassin training, 3) get stabbed, 4) survive because plot armour, 5) congrats you're a master assassin now (?)
If it had been a dumb show with no logic or attention paid to world building from the start none of that would really matter, but it just does a straight about turn from relatively smart to pants on head stupid right at season 5. Shout out to Littlefinger, whose character literally turned into "nothing I do makes sense until you realise that I'm just here to generate "OMG SO SHOCKING" moments".
Ultimately the writers realised that there were two groups of people into the show; people who liked the plotting and scheming and people who loved the drama and shocks, and decided to chase the latter without realising the former was what made it possible.
|
|
スコットランド
Junior Member
Delicious gruel
Posts: 3,934
|
Post by スコットランド on May 19, 2022 8:33:48 GMT
Turning Tyrion into a pointless idiot was really quite annoying. The tits and arses always looked nice I suppose.
|
|