malek86
Junior Member
Pomegranate Deseeder
Posts: 3,235
|
Post by malek86 on Mar 12, 2024 17:26:47 GMT
The Manchurian Candidate (1962)
The story kinda grinds to a halt in the middle third, and some of the dialogue doesn't make much sense (did anyone say the train scene?), but it is a good, fun watch, with an engaging story, even if everyone probably knows how it ends already.
8/10
|
|
|
Post by retro74 on Mar 12, 2024 17:42:30 GMT
simple I agree with you on Poor Things. It’s a good film but not a great one
|
|
|
Post by Chopsen on Mar 12, 2024 20:43:32 GMT
The Beekeeper. I'm surprised by the rather decent RT score, I felt there have been better outings for the Stath that bombed. Maybe it's just Ayer's way of directing action flicks I don't like. 5 honey jar concussions out of 10. . It is properly bang on average. It kept me entertained but fuck me is it predictable and stupid. All the performances all felt just slightly...off, as well in a way I can't qyite put my finger on. And Statham really is a crap actor. Still nowhere near as bad as Expend4bles, which is the worst action movie I've seen in ages. Possibly ever.
|
|
|
Post by dfunked on Mar 12, 2024 20:48:05 GMT
I loved the bit where he sets fire to an office block with some petrol from a can and then it EXPLODES.
|
|
Tomo
Junior Member
Posts: 3,442
|
Post by Tomo on Mar 12, 2024 20:50:31 GMT
The Kitchen - Netflix - 5/10
Competently made if fairly dull film about a futuristic mildly dystopian London estate. Amazing cameo/supporting role by Ian Wright as a pirate radio host/leader.
|
|
|
Post by retro74 on Mar 12, 2024 20:59:31 GMT
I enjoyed The Beekeeper, it’s total crap but still good fun throughout
Some of the lines where he’s explaining to the call centre people that what they are doing is naughty are so badly written that they become funny
Solid recommendation
|
|
Duffman5
Junior Member
big cook, little cook welcome to our cafe
Posts: 1,332
|
Post by Duffman5 on Mar 13, 2024 8:31:55 GMT
The Beekeeper. I'm surprised by the rather decent RT score, I felt there have been better outings for the Stath that bombed. Maybe it's just Ayer's way of directing action flicks I don't like. 5 honey jar concussions out of 10. . It is properly bang on average. It kept me entertained but fuck me is it predictable and stupid. All the performances all felt just slightly...off, as well in a way I can't qyite put my finger on. And Statham really is a crap actor. Still nowhere near as bad as Expend4bles, which is the worst action movie I've seen in ages. Possibly ever. Re Expendables, it is such a shame that Stallone shit the bed with the sequels, the first was proper old skool action movies, as soon as the age rating was downgraded it was never going to be that "good" again.
|
|
monkman5000
Junior Member
Posts: 2,752
Member is Online
|
Post by monkman5000 on Mar 13, 2024 9:31:48 GMT
I loved the bit where he sets fire to an office block with some petrol from a can and then it EXPLODES. Spoiler
|
|
wunty
Full Member
Pastry Forward
Posts: 6,671
|
Post by wunty on Mar 13, 2024 10:17:33 GMT
. It is properly bang on average. It kept me entertained but fuck me is it predictable and stupid. All the performances all felt just slightly...off, as well in a way I can't qyite put my finger on. And Statham really is a crap actor. Still nowhere near as bad as Expend4bles, which is the worst action movie I've seen in ages. Possibly ever. Re Expendables, it is such a shame that Stallone shit the bed with the sequels, the first was proper old skool action movies, as soon as the age rating was downgraded it was never going to be that "good" again. I'm sure the first Expendables came out not long after Rambo (the one set in Burma) didn't it? So I got my hopes up thinking he was going to follow on from that. I mean. He called it The Expendables. I hoped it would be all these old action movie stars getting picked off one by one in an orgy of bloodshed. That didn't happen so my expectations for the sequels went in the bin and never bothered with any of them after the second one. THe first was disappointing but servicable but can't tell you a thing about the sequel.
|
|
mikeck
Junior Member
Posts: 1,914
|
Post by mikeck on Mar 13, 2024 11:39:38 GMT
The Kitchen - Netflix - 5/10 Competently made if fairly dull film about a futuristic mildly dystopian London estate. Amazing cameo/supporting role by Ian Wright as a pirate radio host/leader. I was hoping for more from this, it just felt a bit flat and didn't really go anywhere. Ian Wright was great though
|
|
|
Post by Duffking on Mar 13, 2024 11:54:45 GMT
Dune (netflix) Dune (4OD) Jodorowsky’s Dune (prime rental) Obviously the most recent is the most visually impressive, no one does scale in sci-fi like Villeneuve, but it is fun watching them side by side to see all the cross pollination from Lynch’s film. Its been a long time since I’ve read the book but the whole style of everything looking like the European aristocracy of C19th and early C20th is something I associate with Lynch not Herbert. I don’t think I’d appreciated how much of the dialogue is virtually identical in them both either. Even though the newer film takes twice as long as the original to get to the same point neither feels rushed or like it drags. A lot of the dialogue is more or less straight from the book. It's funny how they're both pretty faithful adaptations in their own ways, though I think the Lynch film falls down because the structure is weird (in part because it just didn't have time) and there are some odd choices for what to put in and leave out. Bloody amazing sets and costumes though. Jodorowsky’s vision was clearly to make the story weirder than the book not less weird as the finished films did. Its interesting to see his ambition and see his plans but a lot of the changes he suggests would probably have doomed it to pseuds corner (if not being an outright chore to watch) and scared the money men enough that the other two would never have been made. Tagline for Jodorowsky's version:
does anyone remember when the NFT bros bought a copy of a book and thought that meant they had the rights to the entire dune franchise
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Mar 13, 2024 12:12:24 GMT
I thought that was absolutely fascinating, for clarification they bought Jodorowsky's art book for his vision of Dune. That they had a collective but no collective intelligence to parse what they had actually bought was truly chef's kiss. It really led credence to the idea that a lot of NFT adjacent people aren't these smart wunderkinds.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Mar 13, 2024 13:19:09 GMT
I'm not sure I've ever managed to watch a whole Expendables movie, just seen lots of bits of various ones.
It's a shame they (apparently) haven't managed to make decent movies, given some of the cast they managed to assemble. Even the newest one, despite seemingly losing most of the biggest western stars, has a bunch of really good asian action people in it. (good at the fighting at least, if not always the acting)
|
|
|
Post by simple on Mar 13, 2024 13:23:40 GMT
I always thought it was strange that the sequels looked so much like the sort of straight to dvd stuff that half of the cast would be doing outside of the franchise. Like surely there was an audience and money to be made from Stallone and Arnie teaming up somewhere.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Mar 13, 2024 13:28:28 GMT
The bits I saw (no idea which ones from), it was mainly the young guys doing all the heavy lifting anyway. Seemed to be 80% Statham and Jet Li.
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Mar 13, 2024 13:32:27 GMT
Get Statham's name right. It's LEE CHRISTMAS.
|
|
|
Post by rawshark on Mar 13, 2024 13:37:52 GMT
I won’t lie, I really enjoyed the Chuck Norris bits in Expendables 2.
|
|
|
Post by simple on Mar 13, 2024 13:43:02 GMT
Get Statham's name right. It's LEE CHRISTMAS. I remember absolutely cracking up at one of his movies where he was a London gangster called something like Terry Leather.
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Mar 13, 2024 13:44:42 GMT
I won’t lie, I really enjoyed the Chuck Norris bits in Expendables 2. If you want some fun that's Stallone adjacent, then watch The Specialist. It's insane not just because of James Woods eating the scenery, or Rod Stinger trying to Latino, it's also because it's a movie where Stallone genuinely thought that his naked body was what audiences would pay to see, not Sharon Stone whose naked body was what the cinema going public had actually paid to see.
|
|
|
Post by rawshark on Mar 13, 2024 14:00:28 GMT
I won’t lie, I really enjoyed the Chuck Norris bits in Expendables 2. If you want some fun that's Stallone adjacent, then watch The Specialist. It's insane not just because of James Woods eating the scenery, or Rod Stinger trying to Latino, it's also because it's a movie where Stallone genuinely thought that his naked body was what audiences would pay to see, not Sharon Stone whose naked body was what the cinema going public had actually paid to see. I do actually remember that. How could anyone forget Sly’s wet, shimmering butt cheeks pumping away in that shower.
|
|
Binky
Junior Member
Posts: 1,111
Member is Online
|
Post by Binky on Mar 13, 2024 14:14:19 GMT
I always thought it was strange that the sequels looked so much like the sort of straight to dvd stuff that half of the cast would be doing outside of the franchise. Like surely there was an audience and money to be made from Stallone and Arnie teaming up somewhere. It wasn't very good. www.imdb.com/title/tt1211956/?ref_=nm_flmg_c_23_act
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2024 14:31:48 GMT
DNDHAT
It was very okay. If it came out in the early 2000s, I’d be regarded as poorly as the Jeremy Irons/Marlon Wayans film. Because it was released last year, its reputation was elevated because it doesn’t feature superheroes.
Not absolutely terrible, but paper thin plot and characters, terrible visual effects (but still not as bad as The Flash). Extremely forgettable. I’m glad I finally saw it, so I can get it out of the back of my head that I should watch it at some point.
|
|
wunty
Full Member
Pastry Forward
Posts: 6,671
|
Post by wunty on Mar 13, 2024 15:33:52 GMT
I won’t lie, I really enjoyed the Chuck Norris bits in Expendables 2. If you want some fun that's Stallone adjacent, then watch The Specialist. It's insane not just because of James Woods eating the scenery, or Rod Stinger trying to Latino, it's also because it's a movie where Stallone genuinely thought that his naked body was what audiences would pay to see, not Sharon Stone whose naked body was what the cinema going public had actually paid to see. It's also got an excellent John Barry score.
|
|
|
Post by britesparc on Mar 13, 2024 21:00:38 GMT
X-Men (2000)
So I'm trying to rewatch all* the Fox X-Men movies before Deadpool, just in case there's some random seventeen-frame joke I miss because I forgot all the different actors who played Kitty Pryde.
Anyway, the film definitely holds up in most respects. Compared to modern superhero films (or even superhero-adjacent action movies like, say, Dungeons & Dragons) this is a fairly sedate affair, as we're slowly immersed in the world of mutants. The first half's creeping tension and drip-feed world-building actually reminded me of that other 90s X-property, The X-Files. Again, however, compared to modern films its symbolism and allegory is incredibly heavy-handed and on the nose; which, I guess, reflects not just the need to introduce this world to a mainstream audience for the first time but also the timbre of the comics it was adapting. Anyway, the performances are largely good (Sabertooth and Toad notwithstanding) but, really, apart from Jackman, McKellen, and Paquin, hardly anyone is given anything to do or really much in the way of character at all (even my beloved P-Stewz, essentially being Professor Exposition until he's taken out of action for the third act). And speaking of action, it is rather flat and sedate. In fact, the slow pace, stagebound nature, and mediocre action choreography does make it look like the pilot of a network superhero drama; if the main actors were five or ten years younger it could have been part of the Arrowverse. That feels like a bit of a dig, and it isn't; whilst I definitely feel it is showing its age, it's still a compelling, mostly exciting film, with some great performances and a nice sense of a "real" world of mutants. It still retains that sense of setting the stage for more complex and engaging adventures. Let's see if I think X2 is as good as it used to be, I guess.
Three Xs out of five.
*I doubt I'll actually watch all of them; I think I saw Apocalypse and Dark Phoenix as soon as they came on Disney+, which is recent enough to know they're both pretty shit.
|
|
|
Post by rawshark on Mar 13, 2024 21:31:07 GMT
I’ll be interested to see what you think of The Last Stand. I always thought - JuggerVinnie aside - it was unfairly maligned.
|
|
|
Post by britesparc on Mar 13, 2024 21:52:02 GMT
One of the things I am looking forward to is most of these films I've only seen once. So I hated Last Stand, but that was when it came out; I mean, in retrospect, it's probably better than most DCEU films!
|
|
geefe
Full Member
Short for Zangief
Posts: 8,323
|
Post by geefe on Mar 13, 2024 21:56:06 GMT
X-Men is definitely a totally different feel of film to pretty much all the others. It's slower, light on action and just very 90s.
The fact that they didn't call the Last Stand X-M3n is criminal.
|
|
|
Post by rawshark on Mar 13, 2024 21:58:02 GMT
The almost funny thing is they’ve done the same film twice, and despite all the advances in special effects and all the benefits that hindsight brings, Dark Phoenix is still categorically the worse film.
|
|
Reviewer
Junior Member
Posts: 4,419
Member is Online
|
Post by Reviewer on Mar 13, 2024 22:35:42 GMT
Dune part 2 9/10 Really liked it and even when slow there was a lot going on. Looked amazing even in shitty cineworld screens (where it’s at least 20% darker than it should be).
|
|
nazo
Junior Member
Posts: 1,294
Member is Online
|
Post by nazo on Mar 13, 2024 22:47:17 GMT
Dune pt 2 (Leicester Square IMAX, crappy seats right in the back corner because it’s still pretty much fully booked)
Superb, loved it from start to finish. Hope they make more, the ending certainly had a few loose ends.
10/10
|
|