Lizard
Junior Member
I love ploughmans
Posts: 4,470
|
Post by Lizard on Mar 10, 2024 23:21:17 GMT
It's a godsend for those of us who can't get to the cinema much though. It's a proper treat these days, especially to go to Cineworld for the full experience. Our local independent is the cracking but it's a bit rough around the edges. And life just gets in the way. Yes. Ideally, I would see all films at the cinema, but for years I lived somewhere with only an Odeon. I would've loved streaming back then.
|
|
Vandelay
Junior Member
Posts: 4,664
Member is Online
|
Post by Vandelay on Mar 10, 2024 23:24:15 GMT
Still think cinema is a great experience and will always prefer to go and see a film at the cinema over waiting for streaming. Same. Even if it was simultaneous cinema/streaming release I would go to the cinema for most films I wanted to see. I think having a quick turnaround is probably a good thing for a lot of films though. I can't imagine having to wait 6 months instead of 2 months is really going to encourage those that would rather watch at home to go to the cinema. There is so much media you can consume at home now, that I would think a lot of people would just choose to watch something else. Plus, positive word of mouth from the theatrical release will still linger by the time it is in the home. Saltburn, for example, seemed to benefit from that quite a lot.
|
|
|
Post by Dougs on Mar 10, 2024 23:29:19 GMT
When you've got kids and a hectic schedule though, it's a nightmare for babysitting, and expensive if it's a family film. Trying to work out times for the new Ghostbusters release on opening weekend but it's a bit of a nightmare with all the other extra curricular stuff they do
|
|
|
Post by rawshark on Mar 10, 2024 23:41:56 GMT
Oh man for the days where I’d get home from work, not have anything pressing to do so scoot down to Acton for a late showing of something. But then I went and had to breed.
But Hey Dugee is good, too.
|
|
|
Post by simple on Mar 11, 2024 0:43:33 GMT
When you've got kids and a hectic schedule though, it's a nightmare for babysitting, and expensive if it's a family film. Trying to work out times for the brw Ghostbusters release on opening weekend but it's a bit of a nightmare with all the other extra curricular stuff they do I basically need to book an afternoon off work and fly solo if I want to see anything at the cinema. And with my team at work being below half capacity for most of the last year (2 of 5) I’ve not felt comfortable even fitting that in.
|
|
|
Post by simple on Mar 11, 2024 1:14:56 GMT
Dune (netflix) Dune (4OD) Jodorowsky’s Dune (prime rental)
All rewatches. Fun this time to notice how similar they all are, clearly Dune inspires a level of majesty and grandeur you don’t get with many stories.
Obviously the most recent is the most visually impressive, no one does scale in sci-fi like Villeneuve, but it is fun watching them side by side to see all the cross pollination from Lynch’s film. Its been a long time since I’ve read the book but the whole style of everything looking like the European aristocracy of C19th and early C20th is something I associate with Lynch not Herbert.
I don’t think I’d appreciated how much of the dialogue is virtually identical in them both either. Even though the newer film takes twice as long as the original to get to the same point neither feels rushed or like it drags.
I think they’re both 10s.
Jodorowsky’s version might only exist as storyboards but there are definitely design choices in it that filter down through the other two. Although Villeneuve‘s style being so dry and realistic means you could argue that each successive iteration is simply stripping layer’s of weirdness away from this attempt while retaining its epic core.
Jodorowsky’s vision was clearly to make the story weirder than the book not less weird as the finished films did. Its interesting to see his ambition and see his plans but a lot of the changes he suggests would probably have doomed it to pseuds corner (if not being an outright chore to watch) and scared the money men enough that the other two would never have been made.
Having Moebius, Chris Foss and HR Giger are designing elements of the visuals is a huge statement and you can see parts of their work in both complete films.
SyFy miniseries next?
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Mar 11, 2024 2:03:15 GMT
I've only seen Part 1 of NuDune, but it did feel very heavily inspired by Dune. Since they're both based on a book I haven't read since I was about 12, I'm not sure how much is just their common ancestry, but a lot of the design and dialogue did seem pretty identical.
The SyFy mini series is ok, if you can look past the low budget and rather weird costumes. The second one is better. The budget limits it, but being a mini-series gives it more space to tell the story than Dune had. Of course, Dune also achieved that by splitting Dune into two parts.
|
|
Binky
Junior Member
Posts: 1,110
Member is Online
|
Post by Binky on Mar 11, 2024 8:02:15 GMT
Killers of the Flower Moon
An epic story of a snake in the grass. Beautiful to look at with some fantastic performances. Whilst I was hooked instantly by the story, by the end I was glad it was finishing. Definitely a little too long for the story it was telling (although, ironically, I'm not sure what I'd chop).
8/10 (at 8.30) 7/10 (at midnight)
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,578
Member is Online
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Mar 11, 2024 8:17:51 GMT
I've only seen Part 1 of NuDune, but it did feel very heavily inspired by Dune. I thought the same when watching Lord Of The Rings.
|
|
|
Post by clemfandango on Mar 11, 2024 8:22:19 GMT
Bad Boys - 7/10
I’ve only seen this once before so couldn’t remember much, it’s basically a Micheal bay version of lethal weapon, but not as good. Smith and Lawrence are good and have some funny moments but the rest of the cast are sub standard. The action is good but not great and thankfully the Micheal Bayisms are kept to a minimum. I was expecting more from this one, but it’s nowhere near top tier 90s action.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Mar 11, 2024 8:32:10 GMT
Loads of people love Bad Boys, but I never really understood why.
Mind you, it does feel pretty heavily inspired by Bad Boys.
|
|
geefe
Full Member
Short for Zangief
Posts: 8,323
|
Post by geefe on Mar 11, 2024 8:59:44 GMT
Well A Star is Born is heavily inspired by A Star is Born, but it twists the formula a bit with A Star is Born.
|
|
cubby
Full Member
doesn't get subtext
Posts: 6,329
Member is Online
|
Post by cubby on Mar 11, 2024 9:00:33 GMT
Everyone knows A Star is Born is the best one.
|
|
Gruf
Junior Member
Even more taciturn than my name suggests
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by Gruf on Mar 11, 2024 9:06:30 GMT
Poor Things 4/10 Not for me. I don't get on with Lanthimos's films TBH, thought the Favourite was pants as well.
Big fan of Emma Stone in most things, but not in this.
All in all its not my bag man.
|
|
|
Post by GigaChad Sigma. on Mar 11, 2024 9:22:13 GMT
The Beekeeper.
I'm surprised by the rather decent RT score, I felt there have been better outings for the Stath that bombed. Maybe it's just Ayer's way of directing action flicks I don't like.
5 honey jar concussions out of 10.
|
|
|
Post by rawshark on Mar 11, 2024 10:34:54 GMT
Poor Things I can understand how it's not going to be everyone's cup of tea. It's an unsettling watch - or maybe challenging? Maybe deabtable, but I felt Bella was being groomed as we enter the second act, and even the idea of a baby's brain being inserted into a grown woman's body is an icky one. And Yorgos is breaking out the fish eye lens again just to make sure our eyes don't get too comfortable. But as others have said it's also a very funny film, and all these discomforting issues are intentional and are executed pertfectly. Plus it's as visually arresting a film as you're ever likely to see. Honestly I have difficulties finding any flaws. 10/10 I think it would make a really good double-bill with Barbie as both feel indebted to classic stories (Pinocchio for Barbie. For Poor Things the obvious comparison is Frankenstein but I'd argue it owes as much to Flowers for Algernon, at least on its upward trajectory) while also injecting a very topical edge. And the visual design on both are incredible - like I said in the Oscars thread it feels a shame one of these films had to miss out.
|
|
|
Post by skalpadda on Mar 11, 2024 13:12:22 GMT
Dune (netflix) Dune (4OD) Jodorowsky’s Dune (prime rental) Obviously the most recent is the most visually impressive, no one does scale in sci-fi like Villeneuve, but it is fun watching them side by side to see all the cross pollination from Lynch’s film. Its been a long time since I’ve read the book but the whole style of everything looking like the European aristocracy of C19th and early C20th is something I associate with Lynch not Herbert. I don’t think I’d appreciated how much of the dialogue is virtually identical in them both either. Even though the newer film takes twice as long as the original to get to the same point neither feels rushed or like it drags. A lot of the dialogue is more or less straight from the book. It's funny how they're both pretty faithful adaptations in their own ways, though I think the Lynch film falls down because the structure is weird (in part because it just didn't have time) and there are some odd choices for what to put in and leave out. Bloody amazing sets and costumes though. Jodorowsky’s vision was clearly to make the story weirder than the book not less weird as the finished films did. Its interesting to see his ambition and see his plans but a lot of the changes he suggests would probably have doomed it to pseuds corner (if not being an outright chore to watch) and scared the money men enough that the other two would never have been made. Tagline for Jodorowsky's version:
|
|
|
Post by simple on Mar 11, 2024 14:54:35 GMT
That bit has really aged like warm milk and it was far from ideal to start with.
I wonder how he’s looking forward to Taika Waititi and Jermaine Clement rogering The Incal.
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Mar 11, 2024 15:02:31 GMT
The Beekeeper. I'm surprised by the rather decent RT score, I felt there have been better outings for the Stath that bombed. Maybe it's just Ayer's way of directing action flicks I don't like. 5 honey jar concussions out of 10. The best thing about this film is the Spanish title for it. Beekeeper El Protector.
|
|
|
Post by GigaChad Sigma. on Mar 11, 2024 15:07:55 GMT
Poor Things was elevated to excellent by Ruffalo's elocution. His "Fucks" were delivered in such a delightful manner.
Both Bella and Duncan had me cackling out load with some of that dialogue.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,578
Member is Online
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Mar 11, 2024 15:11:06 GMT
I did laugh a lot when they got hoofed off the boat and he just kept yelling one word obscenities at her.
|
|
MolarAm🔵
Full Member
Bad at games
Posts: 6,827
|
Post by MolarAm🔵 on Mar 11, 2024 15:22:10 GMT
I love how thoroughly broken he becomes after she says "oh and I let some other guy give me cunnilingus, it was great what's the big deal, wait why are you crying"
His whole performance was one of the best things about the movie, really. It masterfully tread the line between me hating him (he really is a bit of a penis), and feeling just a bit sorry for him (he goes through... a lot). It's great as a comedic performance too.
|
|
geefe
Full Member
Short for Zangief
Posts: 8,323
|
Post by geefe on Mar 12, 2024 7:32:25 GMT
Bone Tomahawk
Still great. Does so much with so little and some great lines.
"I'm the most intelligent man here" "Why's that?" "You are all married. Smart men don't get married"
"Will you say goodbye to my wife for me?" "If you say hello to mine"
Chills.
Oh yeah and it's got some gore.
8/10
|
|
|
Post by Trowel 🏴 on Mar 12, 2024 7:42:47 GMT
I love how thoroughly broken he becomes after she says "oh and I let some other guy give me cunnilingus, it was great what's the big deal, wait why are you crying. The line that cracked me up was: "Did he lie with you?" "No. We were against a wall."
|
|
|
Post by simple on Mar 12, 2024 11:17:20 GMT
Poor Things (disney+) I don’t think I found this half as funny as a lot of other people. There are laughs at the absurdity of parts of it, and Ruffalo’s character in particular, but I don’t think I thought it was a funny film. I did think it looked great though, that’s probably the biggest strength for me and Bella’s character arc is obviously one of the biggest you’ll see in a film these days. I think Stone is better playing the ‘adult’ Bella than the ‘child’ one. The child reminded me too much of Keira Knightly chewing the walls in A Dangerous Method (going “full r****d” as the kids put it). The adult one confronting the norms of their society and attitudes to sex, gender, class etc was nicely done.
Having gone in relatively blind - hadn’t even watched a trailer - I was getting a bit worried during the first half that I was going to be watching a Tim Burton adaptation of Lolita. So very glad it mostly pulled out of that despite all the question marks around consent. Its good but I don’t think it would be a strong recommend from me. Probably more a question of taste than quality though so maybe I’m just not in the right mood.
|
|
|
Post by harrypalmer on Mar 12, 2024 15:49:25 GMT
Dungeons & Dragons Honour Among Thieves (4k disk from cinema paradiso) - 3/5
Fun, messy and a bit plodding. The quest itself takes far too long to get going and in the end I didn't really care anyway, but the cast are great and it has some great moments, Hugh Grant channelling Boris Johnson, and the fat dragon escape being my highlights. Clearly made with love and reverence for the source material. Similar vibe to Guardians of the Galaxy.
I wish the camera wasn't so hyperactive as it really detracts from the fantasy setting. I was also constantly distracted by Chris Pine's ridiculous hair.
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Mar 12, 2024 16:15:57 GMT
Surely you mean beautiful hair? I really enjoyed it was a refreshing old fashioned romp.
|
|
|
Post by harrypalmer on Mar 12, 2024 16:27:37 GMT
The chestnut highlights were a step too far.
|
|
mrpon
Junior Member
Posts: 3,706
|
Post by mrpon on Mar 12, 2024 16:56:35 GMT
Harry obviously not a Pine Nut.
|
|
dmukgr
Junior Member
Posts: 1,505
|
Post by dmukgr on Mar 12, 2024 17:06:04 GMT
The quest itself takes far too long to get going and in the end I didn't really care anyway, Yeah, this was my issue with it too.
|
|