DC Films

All of the Terminators after 2 are shit, it's just a case of the consistency of the shit.

God, Edward Furlong was the dog's bollocks when I was ten. Y'know when you read about comic books in the 40s and how Robin was this child-appeal character, because kids knew they'd never be Batman, but they could imagine themselves as Robin? That was me and Edward Furlong. I just wanted to ride around on the back of Arnold's motorbike, hack into ATMs with my fucking Atari palmtop computer or whatever the hell it was, and have a big floppy fringe covering my eyes.

I think it's the "did you just call moi a dipshit" line that flips me over to Skynet. Just kill him already.

We should be thankful to Dark Fate. It had a level of basic competence that proved nobody really gives a shit about new The Terminator product even if its actually alright and has seemingly forced hollywood to give up on it.

As shit as Genisys was, I wanted to see how the story was going to get resolved. Didn't they make John Conner a bad guy in it?

Probably nowhere and I think that was the point. We have a girl John Connor but shes still a John Connor. Now John Connor is a genre rather than a person, shes still destined to lead the resistance so a murder bot will come and try to kill her. There are only so many times you can re-tell that story (six, seemingly)

Yep. Still don't know why they gave it away in the trailer. Would have been a good surprise.

Let's just agree to call it Terminator 5: Phil Collins

Unless it’s reported in the trades or a reliable source, I don’t believe it. Don’t think it’ll happen.

Edit: just looked at the source. She says they are planning something but nothing but announced in the DCU as of yet. 

Bonus to pissing off the Cavill fans though. 

This has come from Gal and not Gunn about WW3. They should recast her.

TBF after the awfulness that was WW84 it was probably a good thing that she walked of her own volition.

But we already know they're not recasting everybody, so why not try to keep one of the most successful bits of the DCEU? Gadot went from essentially unknown to feeling iconic in the role, and starred in the franchise's best film (and, er, WW84). 

If Aquaman, the Peacemaker cast, and possibly others (Blue Beetle? Shazam? Harley?) are sticking around, it makes sense to have Wonder Woman too.

I'm sorta playing Devil's Advocate coz I would have liked Cavill to stay but I understand the desire to do a cleaner reboot of Superman without the various bits of story baggage from the Snyder era. Like having Lois already know his secret, having them already be a couple, having him die and come back, etc. Affleck didn't want to do it anymore by all accounts. So if WW has a relatively clean, simpler backstory, with less to retcon or explain, and a star who wants to carry on, then I get all that. However, I do also get why recasting two of the Trinity and not the third might also be confusing.

Basically, unless you throw away EVERYTHING and start from scratch, you're always going to end up with some sort of mess. But that just feels like a very accurate DC Comics reboot to me!

And I thought those Momoa rumours turned out to be false, that he posted a video saying he was excited to be doing more Aquaman? Might be wrong on that one.

It's impossible to know what's going on backstage.
They might have been just using it as a way to drive down her salary requests for all we know.
Momoa might hate Aquaman and want to move to Lobo, but there's a new Aquaman movie coming out soon so he can hardly say that.

I do feel like Gadot went from nobody to iconic in the role, which you can't really say of Cavill or Affleck, so it makes much more sense to keep her. Plus her standalone movies have been pretty separated from the others, what with being in the WW1 and 1984.

It'll be interesting to see what they do with Harley, what with Robbie becoming so big recently.

Maybe they should do a WW + Harley movie.