|
Post by theguy on Jan 30, 2024 14:10:38 GMT
I thought we agreed not to bring it up
|
|
|
Post by Whizzo on Jan 30, 2024 14:17:06 GMT
This is interesting polling, only the over-70s being majority Conservative support? The triple lock certainly isn't going any time soon.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,643
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Jan 30, 2024 14:39:17 GMT
The interesting thing about that is the 50-60s. Congrats on breaking 'vote conservative as you get older', dickheads.
|
|
|
Post by Whizzo on Jan 30, 2024 14:46:56 GMT
It's nice that my fellow Gen-Xers have decided to wake up.
|
|
Vortex
Full Member
Harvey Weinstein's Tattered Penis
is apparently a mangina.
Posts: 5,407
|
Post by Vortex on Jan 30, 2024 15:13:24 GMT
It's nice that my fellow Gen-Xers have decided to wake up. We all remember the Thatcher era i guess! 😀
|
|
|
Post by Matt A on Jan 30, 2024 15:19:59 GMT
I wonder if it’s that people are more left wing now or if it’s a pattern. Old people voting Tory because they are predominantly quite wealthy so a Tory vote is in their self interest and so because now the Tory’s have fucked up the country people are doing less well and require a left wing stereotypical high tax government, so it’s a trend routed in self interest.
|
|
|
Post by Matt A on Jan 30, 2024 15:24:53 GMT
Probably stating the obvious thinking on.
|
|
kal
Full Member
Posts: 8,309
|
Post by kal on Jan 30, 2024 15:43:01 GMT
I do wonder how much inheritance tax drives voting behaviour at those older ages. It’s not actually a particularly big money maker, but I wonder if Labour risk losing the left of the party if they drop it as a policy.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,643
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Jan 30, 2024 15:45:17 GMT
Speaking as a middle-aged, white, home owning, child having, above average wage earning, AB demo bloody bloke in prime conservative voting age, they offer me nothing. Disregarding the morality of voting for them, they give me absolutely no incentive to vote for them. Crime? Up. Economy? Fucked. Schools? Fucked. Taxes? *looks at pay packet and weeps*.
They can't even bribe people properly anymore. Even if I didn't give a shit about politics, they can't even put a pound in your pocket. What use are they?
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,643
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Jan 30, 2024 15:48:01 GMT
I do wonder how much inheritance tax drives voting behaviour at those older ages. It’s not actually a particularly big money maker, but I wonder if Labour risk losing the left of the party if they drop it as a policy. The fact that its even an issue is an embarrassment. Idiots and temporarily embarrassed millionaires flapping about because the Daily Mail has told them Labour are coming for their grandmas bungalow.
|
|
kal
Full Member
Posts: 8,309
|
Post by kal on Jan 30, 2024 16:23:08 GMT
I do wonder how much inheritance tax drives voting behaviour at those older ages. It’s not actually a particularly big money maker, but I wonder if Labour risk losing the left of the party if they drop it as a policy. The fact that it’s even an issue is an embarrassment. Idiots and temporarily embarrassed millionaires flapping about because the Daily Mail has told them Labour are coming for their grandmas bungalow. Bit reductive and harsh. As with so many of Labour’s policies it’s one that that will end up hurting the middle classes much more than the elites it was designed to hit, and it’s the middle classes that are the ones that could shift the needle for Labour.
|
|
|
Post by Dougs on Jan 30, 2024 16:27:12 GMT
It's the misconceptions around IHT that are the issue. 4% of estates pay it and if you are the recipients from your parents, unless their assets are over £1m, you won't pay it. Even in the SE, the number of estates caught will be small. But the perception is that the limit is £375k. It's not.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,643
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Jan 30, 2024 16:33:56 GMT
Exactly that. There has been an almost deliberate attempt to obfuscate the actual reach and scope of it to trick people into worrying about it. The fact that its a possible wedge issue is absolutely crazy.
|
|
|
Post by Dougs on Jan 30, 2024 16:38:19 GMT
I had no idea it was that high until I was dealing with my mum's estate.
|
|
cubby
Full Member
doesn't get subtext
Posts: 6,385
|
Post by cubby on Jan 30, 2024 16:39:00 GMT
Everyone's an imaginary millionaire.
|
|
kal
Full Member
Posts: 8,309
|
Post by kal on Jan 30, 2024 16:39:58 GMT
Exactly that. There has been an almost deliberate attempt to obfuscate the actual reach and scope of it to trick people into worrying about it. The fact that it’s a possible wedge issue is absolutely crazy. On both sides. That’s what I’m saying. Labour push the perception of hitting the elites where it hurts (which it doesn’t) to appeal to the left of the party. In reality it’s not a big source of taxation, yet it puts a lot of voters off.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,643
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Jan 30, 2024 16:56:07 GMT
I see. yeah, its so easily avoidable its barely makes a dent in that respect. In the grand scheme of things, even though it really does bugger all, its still a statement of intent so it does mollify me as a floating leftie.
|
|
|
Post by Reviewer on Jan 30, 2024 17:02:39 GMT
As bad as the old people voting conservatives is, voting reform who, as far as I can tell, have the one policy of no more foreigners, suggests old people are just cunts.
Oh and they want to slash taxes. Good luck with that pension grandma. It’s good you don’t give a shit about your kids pensions in the future too.
|
|
kal
Full Member
Posts: 8,309
|
Post by kal on Jan 30, 2024 17:08:00 GMT
One of my biggest issues with Labour is the way they cause divide between the working and middle classes. The Tories do the same because it works in their favour, but it bewilders me that Labour continue to fall into that trap. The middle classes are just a premium version of the working class. They still work 40 hour weeks with nearly every penny going towards a home, food etc, it’s just Waitrose instead of Asda. They have far more in common with the working class than they do with the elites, but Labour group them together which pushes them towards the Tories. Inheritance Tax is a prime example of that kind of policy.
|
|
zephro
Junior Member
Posts: 3,010
|
Post by zephro on Jan 30, 2024 20:07:36 GMT
I think it'd probably help if people just started talking about class in your traditional British way. Labour get very confused with poor/rich or using Marxist terms which don't help.
But the old school system very roughly goes: - Traditional working class - actually poor, works in factories etc. - Skilled working class - train drivers, plumbers, shop stewards etc. - Lower Middle Class - educated but not necessarily paid enough to back it up (teachers or clerks are your classic examples) - Upper Middle Class - educated, enough money to back it up, a certain amount of "connections". E.g. the pricks who go to private school, but like your local regional one not Eton. Family wealth starts to enter into it. (lawyers, doctors etc. who have a hope of being made a partner) - The Elite (aristocrats + proper capitalists) - As above but times ten. Actually owns all of the shit.
Marxism basically you've got the Proletariat, The Petite-Bourgeoisie and the Bourgeoisie. Which does not map on to this at all well. Petite-Bourgeoisie is owners of small businesses / capitalists. So small scale landlords, shop keepers, literally if you're a plumber and you hire someone else. The Bourgeoisie are the capitalist who own the means of production. Which excludes 90% of the British middle class who just get a wage. Yet the cultural gap between the working class and middle class exist no matter how people try to theorise it out of existence.
Then there's the more modern one shaped by the tax system where income defines it. Which again isn't the way people behave. Plumbers or train drivers often earn more than a teacher, but bald angry men just read working class.
It has obviously changed a lot since Edwardian times, mostly through Government intervention. Most baby boomers regardless of class are going to own their home. So many more people go to Uni that they're going to be "middle class" in some sense. Everything is so much more expensive that your local upper middle class are squeezed out of it (local small town Doctors can no longer send their kids to expensive schools), though they still work in professions where there is cache in being a "partner" so owning some capital. It's still probably a more relatable system to talk about that people actually understand though.
Anyway we need to tax economic rent and wealth much more strongly and use some of that money to lower the tax burden on "working people" which includes 90% of people but it's both working and middle class people. But to do that you need to find some language to unite urban liberal middle class people that they're actually in the same boat as socially conservative working class people, mostly in towns. Everyone seems to be fucking shit at that right now though. Starmer is probably giving it a better going than anyone else recently (Milliband, Corbyn, any Tory or any Lib Dem)
|
|
|
Post by Chopsen on Jan 30, 2024 21:18:53 GMT
One of my biggest issues with Labour is the way they cause divide between the working and middle classes. The Tories do the same because it works in their favour, but it bewilders me that Labour continue to fall into that trap. The middle classes are just a premium version of the working class. They still work 40 hour weeks with nearly every penny going towards a home, food etc, it’s just Waitrose instead of Asda. They have far more in common with the working class than they do with the elites, but Labour group them together which pushes them towards the Tories. Inheritance Tax is a prime example of that kind of policy. This a million times.
If you're selling your labour to pay your bills and without the money you make doing that you're screwed: you're one of the proletariat. By definition. Economically you're in the same boat. The distinction between working class and middle class is entirely cultural: it's about what TV you watch, where you get your news and, yes, where you do your shopping. Increasingly it's more about where you are from and grew up geographically than anything else. In terms of how government policy affects you, it makes so little odds it doesn't matter.
The *most* infuriating thing is that those that are culturally working-class fucking *love* the aristocracy (like the royal family and various hangers ons), or even the faux aristocracy (wealthy individuals LARPing it up like Boris Johnson and JRM). GUYS: THEY'RE TAKING YOU FOR A RIDE? CAN'T YOU SEE THAT? Giving you a little plastic union jack to wave while they clear out your pockets.
Gah. Fucks me off no end.
|
|
|
Post by Reviewer on Jan 30, 2024 21:51:37 GMT
One of the things I hate the most about Britain (I know it’s many other countries too) is the reverie for the ultra wealthy, especially when nearly all have got there through who their family is. Asking with that is the common persons love of them and hatred of those without much, which usually includes themselves.
I struggle to think of a single self made rich person, who at the very minimum didn’t have excellent family connections.
|
|
|
Post by stuz359 on Jan 30, 2024 23:22:25 GMT
One of the things I hate the most about Britain (I know it’s many other countries too) is the reverie for the ultra wealthy, especially when nearly all have got there through who their family is. Asking with that is the common persons love of them and hatred of those without much, which usually includes themselves. I struggle to think of a single self made rich person, who at the very minimum didn’t have excellent family connections. It's the lie of the meritocracy. If you work hard and become wealthy it's because of your hard work and talent and you absolutely deserve it. Which means the discourse of the last forty years has been 'you can make it too if you work hard enough and have the talent.' It also infers that if you have accumulated wealth, or are already wealthy, that you are somewhat worthy. It also informs of us why wealth is associated with being virtuous (doing the right things etc...) A lot of the working/middle class truly believe that they can join the upper strata if only they work hard enough. Which is why it's so easy to get them to oppose a wealth tax of any kind. Because one day, it will be them.
|
|
geefe
Full Member
Short for Zangief
Posts: 8,323
|
Post by geefe on Jan 30, 2024 23:54:34 GMT
I was teaching Stuarts the other day and the divine right of Kings.
Not much has changed.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Jan 31, 2024 1:34:01 GMT
One of the things I hate the most about Britain (I know it’s many other countries too) is the reverie for the ultra wealthy, especially when nearly all have got there through who their family is. Asking with that is the common persons love of them and hatred of those without much, which usually includes themselves. I struggle to think of a single self made rich person, who at the very minimum didn’t have excellent family connections. I feel like the UK is one of the least likely to revere the wealthy, due to our general dislike of anyone who's successful. Though it's a lot more complex that that and depends on who you're talking to. Revere the royal family but look down on those nouveau riche people used to be the way, at least. I imagine social media has changed it for younger generations. Of course, you could say that having a general dislike of people who are successful isn't really the way to end up with a country full of successful people.
|
|
|
Post by Reviewer on Jan 31, 2024 9:02:50 GMT
I’ve no issue with successful people, very few have done it without using a lot of other people along the way who haven’t had the reward.
|
|
X201
Full Member
Posts: 5,132
|
Post by X201 on Jan 31, 2024 9:14:28 GMT
Of course, you could say that having a general dislike of people who are successful isn't really the way to end up with a country full of successful people. But, if once they've become successful, they don't turn into tax avoiding off-shore arseholes or job destroying move production abroad gits or use my Govt. contacts PPI floggers you'd have a point.
I've no problem with people being successful as long as they pay their tax and don't crap on the system that helped them get there.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,643
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Jan 31, 2024 9:17:45 GMT
I think Arnie gave a speech on why he hates being called a self-made man. When he was coming up other body builders helped him with his routine, people helped him get parts and all that.
But, yeah, meritocracy is a weird one in this country. We tell people it exists but maintain a strata of people at the top who are there by birth just to show we still all have our betters. You also find there is actually an inverse correlation to how hard someone works and how much they are paid. I do a lot less work than someone toiling in three jobs for minimum wage for less money than me. The social contract shattered a while ago. Its no wonder when the right wing media started trying to conscription going for some reason, everyone turned around and said 'fuck you'.
|
|
|
Post by Reviewer on Jan 31, 2024 9:26:32 GMT
Yeah, it’s in his book too and he’s very good at recognising others. He’s worked incredibly hard and there’s a bit of luck involved but others have contributed a lot.
I work a lot harder than others where I am/many of those above me but nowhere near as hard as loads in other industries that are on a pittance. A lot of the more senior ones here don’t work as hard but they spend their lives in meetings or driving so do 60 hour weeks so I don’t resent them getting more as they have no life.
|
|
otto
New Member
Posts: 975
|
Post by otto on Jan 31, 2024 9:55:47 GMT
It's nice that my fellow Gen-Xers have decided to wake up. We all remember the Thatcher era i guess! 😀 More to the point, we all also remember the Cameron-May-Johnson-Truss-Sunak-clusterfuckageddon era
|
|