Ulythium
Full Member
Lily-livered
Posts: 7,130
|
Post by Ulythium on Nov 12, 2021 20:00:07 GMT
Has he done *anything* since the IT Crowd other than bang this drum? Seems like a poor way of dealing with writer's block.
According to Wikipedia, he's missed out on employment opportunities and separated from his wife, so there's that.
|
|
|
Post by Danno on Nov 12, 2021 20:01:44 GMT
It remains a peculiar way of coping, but I guess that guy that didn't quite make it as an artist turned out worse.
|
|
|
Post by Sarfrin on Nov 12, 2021 20:06:36 GMT
Speaking of washed-up has-beens, apparently Graham Linehan is behind this doozy: gendercriticalcomingoutday.org/So brave! So very, *very* brave! (Also, buy our shitty merch.) Of all the hills on which to die. Totally legit. Gender criticality isn't a lifestyle choice, it's who you are.
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Nov 12, 2021 20:18:00 GMT
Christ that website is all kinds of embarrassing. Again it's so ironic how he became that guy he used to mock so regularly. It almost comes across as projection.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2021 20:21:45 GMT
What the fuck does this even mean?
"There are a few different sites selling great merch with GC messages. You could wear a definition t-shirt to work or when meeting up with friends/family. You could start using a “Female” design mug in the office. It could be something more subtle like a Women Won’t Wheesht badge or ribbon. Or leave a copy of “Trans” or “Material Girls” on your desk. You don’t have to make a statement – others “in the know” will recognise the subtle signals and maybe start a conversation with you."
What is Wheest? And Trans in this context? It is all so smug, awful and pretty much bizarre.
|
|
Ulythium
Full Member
Lily-livered
Posts: 7,130
|
Post by Ulythium on Nov 12, 2021 20:23:36 GMT
Christ that website is all kinds of embarrassing. Again it's so ironic how he became that guy he used to mock so regularly. It almost comes across as projection.
It's kind of a bummer, in a sense, 'cause I (and many others) loved Black Books and Father Ted. Now he's the television equivalent of Morrissey.
|
|
|
Post by Danno on Nov 12, 2021 20:25:15 GMT
Christ that website is all kinds of embarrassing. Again it's so ironic how he became that guy he used to mock so regularly. It almost comes across as projection.
It's kind of a bummer, in a sense, 'cause I (and many others) loved Black Books and Father Ted. Now he's the television equivalent of Morrissey.
Nail meet head.
|
|
|
Post by skalpadda on Nov 12, 2021 20:37:49 GMT
Thanks. Never heard of her, but I don't really follow print media or the twittersphere so that could be on me. I gave up on taking her seriously when she almost immediately started talking about "when you have a 3 year old boy who likes pink or dresses" you "say that they're really a girl, and take them to the doctor to change their sex", which is just fantastical nonsense. The question of whether minors of 15 and up should be allowed any surgery is at least somewhat sensible (though she mischaracterises the process), but the rest of her arguments are just the same old talk about toilets and locker rooms and sports.
And we'll apparently get more sexist if the gender norms become more fluid between the sexes, but it's only if people born as men are allowed to be more feminine, not the other way around. For some reason.
I wonder if some of these people aren't just so fixated using male/female as an explanatory model for everything that anything that might upset that just feels threatening to them and that's why they'll grasp at any straw to vilify it. Her ending remark about how we "can't know anything" if people get to change their legal gender kind of makes sense if gender is the primary thing you use to understand the world.
|
|
cubby
Full Member
doesn't get subtext
Posts: 6,394
|
Post by cubby on Nov 12, 2021 20:40:33 GMT
The parallel with Morrissey is weirdly accurate in more ways than one, on 10th November he celebrates "Morrissey Day".
|
|
|
Post by Sarfrin on Nov 12, 2021 23:59:21 GMT
He's made his own day? How does he see the calendar with his head that far up his own arse?
|
|
|
Post by Dougs on Nov 13, 2021 23:34:48 GMT
What the fuck does this even mean? "There are a few different sites selling great merch with GC messages. You could wear a definition t-shirt to work or when meeting up with friends/family. You could start using a “Female” design mug in the office. It could be something more subtle like a Women Won’t Wheesht badge or ribbon. Or leave a copy of “Trans” or “Material Girls” on your desk. You don’t have to make a statement – others “in the know” will recognise the subtle signals and maybe start a conversation with you." What is Wheest? And Trans in this context? It is all so smug, awful and pretty much bizarre. Wheest means be quiet/shut up et (I only know it from my Scottish father-in-law, so assume it's a Celtic thing)
|
|
|
Post by drhickman1983 on Nov 14, 2021 8:08:55 GMT
Well fuck em, I'm going to wear my Mermaids charity band. I can virtue signal too.
|
|
|
Post by grizzly on Nov 14, 2021 14:04:19 GMT
Pretty much yeah. FH5 tends to catch a few people off-guard since it refers to systems you haven't seen inages esp. if you're a PC player. Strangttely enough, the game considered me utterly nameless when I played it, despite correctly assigning my first name in 3 and 4. Mabye becuase my windows user account is no longer "Joshua" but "Grizzly" nowadays?
It's more or less a non-issue, I did found it a bit weird that the game has a myriad of options to customize your player character, including pronouns and the ability to assign a femine voice to a male body and vice versa (it's not saint's row levels or anything but it's surprisingly extensive for a game that mostly just has you looking at cars rather then people), but yet somehow just automatically picks your name with no option to change it during character creation itself. Which is a bit weird when you're, say, a person with a man's name playing as a woman.
Anyway here is a Shaun video.
|
|
|
Post by Rubicon on Nov 15, 2021 10:09:51 GMT
What the fuck does this even mean? It could be something more subtle like a Women Won’t Wheesht badge or ribbon. You don’t have to make a statement – others “in the know” will recognise the subtle signals and maybe start a conversation with you." What is Wheest? And Trans in this context? It is all so smug, awful and pretty much bizarre. Wheest means be quiet/shut up et (I only know it from my Scottish father-in-law, so assume it's a Celtic thing) To expand on this slightly: I'm not sure if it has been discussed before (or how much actually makes it outside of the twattersphere) but since the Scottish government have pledged to bring in gender reforms allowing trans people to self-ID, Scotland has become bit of a hotbed for the TERFs. Some of their highlights include instigating a pile-on of Rape Crisis Scotland forcing them to go offline from twitter when they appointed a trans female chief exec and having one of its members charged for transphobic tweets though these were only recently just dropped. Even their pet Glinner gave us a visit. From this has come the 'women won't wheest' slogan which essentially means they feel women are being silenced. But the sooner the Scottish government gets its finger out and brings in the new laws, the sooner they might actually shut up and hopefully fuck off.
|
|
robthehermit
Junior Member
Subjectively amusing
Posts: 2,467
|
Post by robthehermit on Nov 15, 2021 14:33:24 GMT
I'm so glad that none of this shit has got anything to do with me. I get to eat popcorn and watch.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Nov 16, 2021 1:49:13 GMT
It is very weird to me that people who fight hard for equality and human rights in many areas, can fight so strongly against them in another area.
That said, I do have some sympathy for getting so obsessed about an issue, and getting so defensive about it that you end up going down a rabbit hole that's very hard to emerge from. It's part of human nature to get defensive and respond to perceived criticism and attacks by doubling down on the initial argument, even if you initially didn't feel that strongly about it.
Usually, at some point later when you calm down, you realize you're arguing for something you don't even really believe. But sometimes you get so invested in the issue that it appears to become almost impossible to walk away from without basically sacrificing your self-image.
I think this used to be mainly the territory of teenagers, but social media appears to have allowed a lot of adults to take part.
|
|
|
Post by suicida on Nov 16, 2021 9:52:52 GMT
Not sure where to post this, so this thread will do. Remember hateful Gamergate/Breitbart News dickhead Milo Yiannopoulos? Let's see what he's up to these days...
Deplatforming works.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2021 10:08:44 GMT
$87.50 for an adoring virgin does seem a good deal.
|
|
JYM60
New Member
Posts: 606
|
Post by JYM60 on Nov 16, 2021 10:22:01 GMT
I can just never take him seriously. Just seems like he's always taking the piss out of whatever he is doing.
|
|
|
Post by Tonka (🐑,🪤) on Nov 16, 2021 10:25:01 GMT
This is what we really need to wake up to
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Nov 16, 2021 10:37:24 GMT
I can just never take him seriously. Just seems like he's always taking the piss out of whatever he is doing. I think it's called being a shill.
|
|
|
Post by technoish on Nov 16, 2021 10:53:51 GMT
That Milo thing is incredible. It's what I imagine most of the "good" timeline is like, where Johnson is a washed up comedian, Trump went to jail for fraud years ago, and covid stayed in bats.
|
|
lexw
New Member
Posts: 858
|
Post by lexw on Nov 16, 2021 11:49:55 GMT
It is very weird to me that people who fight hard for equality and human rights in many areas, can fight so strongly against them in another area. That said, I do have some sympathy for getting so obsessed about an issue, and getting so defensive about it that you end up going down a rabbit hole that's very hard to emerge from. It's part of human nature to get defensive and respond to perceived criticism and attacks by doubling down on the initial argument, even if you initially didn't feel that strongly about it. Usually, at some point later when you calm down, you realize you're arguing for something you don't even really believe. But sometimes you get so invested in the issue that it appears to become almost impossible to walk away from without basically sacrificing your self-image. I think this used to be mainly the territory of teenagers, but social media appears to have allowed a lot of adults to take part. I think what you're missing here is that this very rarely happens in isolation except to people with or bordering on mental illness. It's not true that normal people double-down endlessly on stuff and go down rabbit holes by themselves. Most people, if people around them yell at them, actually tend to eventually rethink their ideas (for better or worse). The main time they won't is if something is truly intrinsic to them (like sexual orientation), or as noted, if they're not doing well mentally (but the latter is rare and specific). And here's where the internet causes a problem. "By themselves". Because the internet provides people who have similar views to you, and who may well already be organised into groups to support those views, no matter how demented or nasty. And then the backslapping and big-up'ing commences. And you get the circle-jerks and so on. This is why people go down rabbit-holes, not because they're "attacked". It's because they find people who support their lunatic views, and who indeed praise them for having those lunatic views. A compounding factor is that a lot of people out there are seeking praise, often unconsciously. So they find something to hitch their wagon on to, and get praised for. The praise for mainstream things is mild. There's no gold star for not being a racist or sexist (despite men liking to pretend the latter and calling people "white knights", "captain save-a-ho" and so on), so the praise there is always going to be mild at best. So people, again often unconsciously, seek out smaller communities where the praise will be more intense. Or fanatic communities, ones which are growing apace and feel like they're opposed by society, so similarly hand out intense praise. A good recent example would be Qanon. If you started to get into Qanon stuff, you'd get HUGE amount of praise from Qanon people. Your back would be slapped endlessly. You'd watch videos directly praising people like you. So you get these two things combining in a way that's so dangerous it's more binary explosive or something than just "toxic". People with bad views find others with the same views and reinforce them, even when people around them are sane, and people who are drifters seeking praise latch on to those views and say them as a way to get praised, and they often rapidly come to fully believe them, because why wouldn't you believe them if they're getting you praised? My sympathy is strictly limited because it's become clear to me, over decades of talking weirdoes and extremists on the internet, and not turning like that, that the people this happens with are already people with problems. This is why it happens with teenagers and they usually get better - teenagers are exploring the world, they're trying all this stuff out, but they're not there solely for praise and they usually don't dig so deep in they can't get out (again where they do you will almost always find a serious problem leading them to it). JKR, bizarre as might seem, is essentially one of the "praise-drifters". She's seemingly a very suggestible person who passes on opinions from her peer group. A decade or so ago, after she became mega-rich, cut off contact with most of her RL friends, and started getting louder in politics, she became a very online person, but was subject to a lot of criticism and dislike, and very much limited who she talked to online. Largely to leftist feminists of an academic-leaning kind. Which might have been fine, but they were ones her age or thereabouts, and of a certain political bent (and many of them butch lesbians which lead to further complexities re politics), and that's how she ended up getting into GC stuff. And of course they praised her intensely and constantly for having those views, and as she started to air them, she only got more praise from this peer group. Criticism continued, now often from younger people, and JKR just kept blocking people who were critical, even extremely polite ones, then and she decided to basically "come out" as a full-on bigot, and now of course Rowling is getting even more praise from her peer-group. Also a lot of people on the internet are just fucking morons who don't know what's good for them. I was reading about the "TikToc tic" thing earlier today and yeah it seems like watching people with tics doesn't cause them in others except if you're already susceptible to tics (which a lot of people are), and then I'm reading one person with tics and she's like "Oh yeah I watch this dude who has terrible tics all the time and I keep picking up his tics!", and it's like what the fuck is wrong with your brain? Stop fucking watching him! Like I get that you want to communicate with people with your issues, fucking don't just watch a dude and make your issues worse though, that's moronic. But a lot of people are morons, and they find people who won't call them on it.
|
|
Dgzter
Junior Member
Posts: 2,149
|
Post by Dgzter on Nov 16, 2021 16:21:23 GMT
Oh dear Bobby:
|
|
スコットランド
Junior Member
Delicious gruel
Posts: 3,934
|
Post by スコットランド on Nov 16, 2021 16:55:02 GMT
Wow, guy who always seemed like a piece of shit turns out to be a piece of shit..
|
|
Dgzter
Junior Member
Posts: 2,149
|
Post by Dgzter on Nov 16, 2021 17:15:32 GMT
This surely does for him. He has to go. Surely.
Shirley?
|
|
|
Post by Vandelay on Nov 16, 2021 17:18:51 GMT
Yeah, pretty much. Activision-Blizzard's announcement of cleaning itself up always rang hollow when you still had Kotick sitting at the top. If this new batch of issues results in him being given the boot than maybe we can start actually believing some of changes will happen (still probably a slim hope).
|
|
|
Post by technoish on Nov 16, 2021 19:28:10 GMT
No way investors accept this stuff.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2021 19:29:01 GMT
My browser blocks twitter embeds. What's it say?
|
|
|
Post by Danno on Nov 16, 2021 19:51:19 GMT
My browser blocks twitter embeds. What's it say? Activision CEO Bobby Kotick told an employee he would have her killed. He kept an exec from being fired after a sexual harassment claim. He didn't tell his board of alleged rapes and other misconduct. Wall St Journal report, so it's credible
|
|