|
|
P&O
Mar 17, 2022 12:43:38 GMT
Post by salaman on Mar 17, 2022 12:43:38 GMT
This doesn't bode well.
P&O ordered all ships to tie up ahead of a major announcement.
There's speculation they'll fire all staff and replace them with foriegn workers working through agents.
|
|
スコットランド
Junior Member
Delicious gruel
Posts: 3,934
|
P&O
Mar 17, 2022 12:52:16 GMT
Post by スコットランド on Mar 17, 2022 12:52:16 GMT
The glories of crucial transport being owned and operated by cunt companies from the other side of the world.
Thank god stuff like that isn't privatised.
|
|
|
|
P&O
Mar 17, 2022 13:04:47 GMT
Post by smoothpete on Mar 17, 2022 13:04:47 GMT
They made 800 crew redundant this morning, with zero warning.
|
|
|
|
P&O
Mar 17, 2022 13:06:09 GMT
Post by Whizzo on Mar 17, 2022 13:06:09 GMT
Maybe Chris Grayling is the new CEO?
Certainly doesn't look good tying up in port just like that.
|
|
cubby
Full Member
doesn't get subtext
Posts: 6,362
|
P&O
Mar 17, 2022 13:07:54 GMT
Post by cubby on Mar 17, 2022 13:07:54 GMT
Erm, that's not the only way they're letting their passengers know about this, right?
|
|
|
|
P&O
Mar 17, 2022 13:11:11 GMT
Post by Whizzo on Mar 17, 2022 13:11:11 GMT
Disgusting behaviour, not sure shitcanning 800 people like that when the jobs still exist is legal.
|
|
|
|
P&O
Mar 17, 2022 13:22:14 GMT
Post by ToomuchFluffy on Mar 17, 2022 13:22:14 GMT
They made 800 crew redundant this morning, with zero warning. Umm... do I get this right that that's all of them?!? (I did not get it right. Reading useful skill.) They are really asking for trouble...
Edit: "...with P&O planning to use cheap agency staff to operate its ships." Mind-boggling... I have no clue what they think they are doing.
|
|
X201
Full Member
Posts: 5,105
|
P&O
Mar 17, 2022 13:32:11 GMT
via mobile
Post by X201 on Mar 17, 2022 13:32:11 GMT
Disgusting behaviour, not sure shitcanning 800 people like that when the jobs still exist is legal. It’s not illegal. Govt. Website: If you do not consult employees in a redundancy situation, any redundancies you make will almost certainly be unfair and you could be taken to an employment tribunal. And after that you’ve got the fact that the job still exists which makes a good case. |
|
スコットランド
Junior Member
Delicious gruel
Posts: 3,934
|
P&O
Mar 17, 2022 13:37:44 GMT
Gruf likes this
Post by スコットランド on Mar 17, 2022 13:37:44 GMT
I'm sure Rodger PandO lends his yacht out to some Tory MP so It'll all be cushdy.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,629
|
P&O
Mar 17, 2022 13:39:32 GMT
Post by Bongo Heracles on Mar 17, 2022 13:39:32 GMT
Presumably they are relying on some/most of the permanent staff to immediately become 'cheap agency' staff? Either that or there is randomly enough casual labour to staff an entire flotilla in this country.
|
|
|
|
P&O
Mar 17, 2022 13:45:41 GMT
via mobile
Post by Reviewer on Mar 17, 2022 13:45:41 GMT
Probably going to hire some Ukrainians cheap.
Some of those they’re getting rid of will immediately take them up on a job, they probably don’t have that many alternative employment options.
|
|
|
|
P&O
Mar 17, 2022 13:55:37 GMT
Post by Whizzo on Mar 17, 2022 13:55:37 GMT
Blimey, that seems a tad excessive. |
|
dogbot
Full Member
Posts: 8,738
|
P&O
Mar 17, 2022 13:58:42 GMT
Post by dogbot on Mar 17, 2022 13:58:42 GMT
Presumably they are relying on some/most of the permanent staff to immediately become 'cheap agency' staff? Either that or there is randomly enough casual labour to staff an entire flotilla in this country. Apparently, not. From the reports, they had already hired replacement agency crews, who were waiting to board once the fired staff were removed from the ships. Absolute cunts. |
|
|
|
P&O
Mar 17, 2022 14:00:47 GMT
Post by Whizzo on Mar 17, 2022 14:00:47 GMT
Faisal Islam's twitter thread has some details and it's looking very messy.
|
|
|
|
P&O
Mar 17, 2022 14:05:32 GMT
via mobile
Post by dfunked on Mar 17, 2022 14:05:32 GMT
I would've said another company for my shitlist, but it's not like I've even taken a ferry in the past couple of decades.
Shocking stuff. I hope they get reamed in the inevitable tribunal.
|
|
Lizard
Junior Member
I love ploughmans
Posts: 4,483
|
P&O
Mar 17, 2022 23:18:13 GMT
via mobile
khanivor likes this
Post by Lizard on Mar 17, 2022 23:18:13 GMT
Absolutely shameless, it's like something out of Victorian times.
The government should take harsh, swift action against DP World, but of course they won't. Tories would love this kind of shit to be the norm - 'cutting red tape' or some bollocks. They'll do the bare minimum amount of hand-wringing to look like they care, then it's back to shovelling public money into their mates' useless companies.
|
|
|
|
P&O
Mar 18, 2022 0:04:08 GMT
via mobile
Post by khanivor on Mar 18, 2022 0:04:08 GMT
Seems evident that management waited till checks were cashed before moving foreword
|
|
|
|
P&O
Mar 18, 2022 6:45:43 GMT
via mobile
Post by Dougs on Mar 18, 2022 6:45:43 GMT
I've not looked into it, but seems this has been made possible by legislation linked to Freeports. And is likely just the first step in removing employee rights.
|
|
Frog
Full Member
Posts: 7,272
|
P&O
Mar 18, 2022 6:53:44 GMT
via mobile
Post by Frog on Mar 18, 2022 6:53:44 GMT
Different company to P&O cruises apparently. I'm sure quite a lot of people aren't aware of that (I only found out yesterday), I bet it has some knock on damage to their company though.
|
|
X201
Full Member
Posts: 5,105
|
P&O
Mar 18, 2022 12:03:52 GMT
Post by X201 on Mar 18, 2022 12:03:52 GMT
Different company to P&O cruises apparently. I'm sure quite a lot of people aren't aware of that (I only found out yesterday), I bet it has some knock on damage to their company though.
As you'd expect of Twitter. Some people have missed the fine detail.
|
|
|
|
P&O
Mar 18, 2022 12:08:31 GMT
Post by Dougs on Mar 18, 2022 12:08:31 GMT
I suspect there may be a hurried rebrand on the cards
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,629
|
P&O
Mar 18, 2022 12:10:20 GMT
Danno likes this
Post by Bongo Heracles on Mar 18, 2022 12:10:20 GMT
How do you run an 'unviable' ferry company from a fucking island?
|
|
|
|
P&O
Mar 18, 2022 12:12:52 GMT
via mobile
Post by Jambowayoh on Mar 18, 2022 12:12:52 GMT
I've only just seen this, it really is the real life version of the Simpsons scene where Kirk gets fired from the Cracker factory. Fucking disgusting but I get the strongest feeling they'll get away with it, there'll be talk of government pressure but nothing will materialize and in terms of PR it will be terrible for a while but customers will carry on as normal. However we'll see what will happen when you consider the new staff are being given a week's training and their employment terms and conditions are absolute dogshit.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,629
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Mar 18, 2022 12:21:42 GMT
They will have had lawyers going through it for months, nothing will happen. I get involved in redundancies from an insider threat perspective and by the time boots on the ground know about it, its been through every branch of governance in the company twice over. Management will have been preparing for this since christmas.
|
|
gray
New Member
Posts: 435
|
Post by gray on Mar 18, 2022 12:30:28 GMT
I don't recall saying good luck.
|
|
スコットランド
Junior Member
Delicious gruel
Posts: 3,934
|
P&O
Mar 18, 2022 12:35:34 GMT
Post by スコットランド on Mar 18, 2022 12:35:34 GMT
Brexit and free ports are the gift that keep on giving.
|
|
|
|
P&O
Mar 18, 2022 12:57:53 GMT
Post by Chopsen on Mar 18, 2022 12:57:53 GMT
They will have had lawyers going through it for months, nothing will happen. I get involved in redundancies from an insider threat perspective and by the time boots on the ground know about it, its been through every branch of governance in the company twice over. Management will have been preparing for this since christmas. I'm still struggling to see how this could be legal. To sack people with immediate effect and then immediately replace them with a cheaper alternative is just fundamentally incompatible with what I understand about employment law. IANAL but I do employ people, and have needed to brush up on it intermittently when dealing with some tricky people in the past. If I knew you could do this I would have done it ten times over by now. (Jokes, I wouldn't. Please don't hate me).
Redundancy requires a process of consultation and they can't claim redundancy in any case as they just drafted in a whole load of replacements. Changes in pay or condition need consultation.
The only way I can see that this is legal is if the staff they got rid of were all contractors, and not employed staff.
|
|
|
|
P&O
Mar 18, 2022 14:03:07 GMT
via mobile
Post by Dougs on Mar 18, 2022 14:03:07 GMT
Yeah, does seem like it's the consultation where they done fucked up. The tribunals should have a field day. My guess is that they're banking on offering a bit more to go quietly. They may have misjudged that though, not least as there will be loads of lawyers who will take them on pro bono.
Nothing will happen from Govt side though, apart from hand wringing.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,629
|
P&O
Mar 18, 2022 14:11:08 GMT
Post by Bongo Heracles on Mar 18, 2022 14:11:08 GMT
I think this is a deliberate gamble. They dont *have* to give a consultation period but the fact that they havent opens them up to 800 unfair dismissal tribunals which they are betting most people wont be arsed with.
|
|
nexus6
Junior Member
Posts: 2,526
Member is Online
|
P&O
Mar 18, 2022 14:20:54 GMT
Post by nexus6 on Mar 18, 2022 14:20:54 GMT
And turns out the government knew about it a day before.
But not BJ. The Government.
|
|
