Lukus
Junior Member
Posts: 2,700
|
Post by Lukus on Jan 1, 2022 21:58:16 GMT
I still remember making eye contact with Peter Kaye (and wondering where I recognised him from) in HMV in Hanley when I was a student in 2004.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aunt Alison on Jan 1, 2022 22:03:29 GMT
Did he call anyone a slag?
|
|
|
|
Post by Aunt Alison on Jan 1, 2022 22:03:44 GMT
Burnside, not Peter Kay
|
|
|
|
Post by Sarfrin on Jan 1, 2022 22:17:50 GMT
It's just occurred to me that you probably get a fair number of teenage girls in Pizza Express so it's not the best of alibis even if it were remotely true.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2022 22:26:22 GMT
It's just occurred to me that you probably get a fair number of teenage girls in Pizza Express so it's not the best of alibis even if it were remotely true. Neither he or his lawyers have ever been in one, so they wouldn't be aware of that. |
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,625
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Jan 1, 2022 22:31:58 GMT
It is pretty funny. That whole interview was ‘there, that will shut them up’. The fucking idiot didn’t even think that him turning up to pizza express would likely be the most notable thing that ever happened to the people who work there.
|
|
cubby
Full Member
doesn't get subtext
Posts: 6,358
Member is Online
|
Post by cubby on Jan 3, 2022 22:08:33 GMT
So Andrew's team has uncovered the settlement that Guifre and Epstein agreed, which says that she can't sue anyone associated with Epstein, and claimed this as a slam dunk.
So they're saying that they *are* associated with Epstein in order to apply this settlement to their case? Am I the only one thinking that could backfire?
|
|
X201
Full Member
Posts: 5,100
Member is Online
|
Post by X201 on Jan 3, 2022 22:14:29 GMT
So Andrew's team has uncovered the settlement that Guifre and Epstein agreed, which says that she can't sue anyone associated with Epstein, and claimed this as a slam dunk. So they're saying that they *are* associated with Epstein in order to apply this settlement to their case? Am I the only one thinking that could backfire? Pyrrhic victory springs to mind. |
|
Lukus
Junior Member
Posts: 2,700
|
Post by Lukus on Jan 3, 2022 22:25:16 GMT
Also it's worded to be in effect from 'the beginning of time' or something like that. So Andrew can do a paedo Doctor Who and go and nonce up kids throughout the ages.
|
|
Lizard
Junior Member
I love ploughmans
Posts: 4,483
|
Post by Lizard on Jan 3, 2022 22:44:09 GMT
He eats Pizza Express to initiate time travel.
|
|
|
|
Post by Danno on Jan 4, 2022 7:07:12 GMT
He eats Pizza Express to initiate time travel. Having lived in Woking for a few years I can believe that there is at least one wormhole in town |
|
lexw
New Member
Posts: 858
|
Post by lexw on Jan 4, 2022 15:53:33 GMT
Eh, not really. You could pretty easily spin it as "two overworked guards didn't pay attention, fucked up, then tried to cover their tracks so they wouldn't get in trouble". Though on the other hand, they do look pretty shifty in their court pics. The cold-blooded murderers. They weren't "overworked", if you read the case. In fact, they were goofing off the entire time, which was part of why they were charged. I don't think they were even underpaid. These two goofs being assigned to this ultra-high-profile obvious suicide risk prisoner and managing to do nothing but play with their phones, surf the net and so on whilst he killed himself literally 15 feet away, and then getting off with basically zero consequences? I mean, it's quite a thing to happen, and it's not actually routine or typical of US prisons, low as their standards might be. |
|
|
|
Post by Psychotext on Jan 4, 2022 17:39:32 GMT
This sounds vaguely promising in terms of the case going ahead.
|
|
cubby
Full Member
doesn't get subtext
Posts: 6,358
Member is Online
|
Post by cubby on Jan 4, 2022 18:28:45 GMT
Oof, that judge has no time for Andrews lawyers. "Next point" in response to one of their complaints.
They really are throwing everything at the wall, trying to throw out the extended statute of limitations that NY has as it's unconstitutional. Yeah sure, burn the whole system down for a British Prince.
The judge really hit the nail on the head with the point that this settlement agreement was secret. How was any other persons supposed to enforce that if it was secret between Guifre and Epstein?
Oh and also it was signed in florida, so a different jurisdiction.
Christ.
|
|
geefe
Full Member
Short for Zangief
Posts: 8,323
|
Post by geefe on Jan 4, 2022 19:00:50 GMT
Looks like Prince Andrew's going to court, then.
|
|
|
|
Post by brokenkey on Jan 4, 2022 19:24:51 GMT
C4 news said that the photo of handy Andy and Virginia was taken in London. When she was 17. So legal, then?
|
|
Youthist
Junior Member
Enter your message here...
Posts: 1,984
|
Post by Youthist on Jan 4, 2022 19:29:39 GMT
Right but she saying she fucked him in different houses and states in USA. Also on the photo, he says it isn’t a real photo and he says it has a fake / “he has no recollection of this photo ever being taken”. But yes that is in London.
|
|
cubby
Full Member
doesn't get subtext
Posts: 6,358
Member is Online
|
Post by cubby on Jan 4, 2022 19:34:20 GMT
C4 news said that the photo of handy Andy and Virginia was taken in London. When she was 17. So legal, then? Legally it misses the mark for statutory rape, but that's all it does. She's not claiming she was willing. |
|
|
|
Post by brokenkey on Jan 4, 2022 20:13:33 GMT
Yeah, I'm not saying his defence should be "I shagged her but she was legal".
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,625
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Jan 4, 2022 20:24:52 GMT
Right but she saying she fucked him in different houses and states in USA. Also on the photo, he says it isn’t a real photo and he says it has a fake / “he has no recollection of this photo ever being taken”. But yes that is in London. Not sure it was the best idea to draw inspiration from the UKs covid response strategy for your legal defence |
|
|
|
Post by Psychotext on Jan 4, 2022 21:16:39 GMT
The fake photo is in London? Sloppy!
|
|
|
|
Post by Danno on Jan 4, 2022 21:31:18 GMT
The fake photo is in London? Sloppy seconds! |
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Jan 4, 2022 22:32:47 GMT
Yeah, I'm not saying his defence should be "I shagged her but she was legal". It kinda feels like it is to an extent as in "I don't know her but if I did shag her after I had went to Woking Pizza Express it was definitely legal." |
|
Lukus
Junior Member
Posts: 2,700
|
Post by Lukus on Jan 4, 2022 22:46:23 GMT
He's such a shagger he doesn't remember shagging her.
|
|
|
|
Post by dfunked on Jan 7, 2022 13:26:27 GMT
Poor Andy has had to sell a chalet to cover legal costs as Queenie isn't willing to pay.
Ha!
|
|
Dgzter
Junior Member
Posts: 2,147
|
Post by Dgzter on Jan 7, 2022 13:36:55 GMT
Do we happen to know when/if it's going to go ahead?
|
|
|
|
Post by freddiemercurystwin on Jan 7, 2022 13:59:40 GMT
I think it might be today we find out.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2022 9:45:42 GMT
Poor Andy has had to sell a chalet to cover legal costs as Queenie isn't willing to pay. Ha! And this one comment about a chalet led my squirrel of a brain all over the internet. I stopped it when I realised I was reading an Oprah Winfrey article about Sarah Ferguson's debts. Time to close the internet and do life things. |
|
Ulythium
Full Member
Lily-livered
Posts: 7,088
|
Post by Ulythium on Jan 12, 2022 14:31:42 GMT
|
|
geefe
Full Member
Short for Zangief
Posts: 8,323
|
Post by geefe on Jan 12, 2022 15:38:12 GMT
In a jubilee year as well. Palace will be doing everything they can to distance Queen from it. This must be as close to disaster as they can get.
|
|
