|
Post by drhickman1983 on Apr 9, 2022 9:30:32 GMT
Last act of Shang Chi was naff. That's pretty much par for the course. Even the critically acclaimed MCU films like Black Panther can shit the bed at the end.
|
|
|
Post by dfunked on Apr 9, 2022 9:42:03 GMT
Yep. They always devolve to a big smashy CGI-fest for the last act I'm getting so bored of it.
|
|
aubergine
Junior Member
I must get over myself
Posts: 2,181
|
Post by aubergine on Apr 9, 2022 10:25:10 GMT
The only one that mercifully broke the mould was Civil War. The finale seemed so obviously going to be a fight with 5 Captain Russias and then they shitcanned that idea and had a great little fight between Iron Man, Cap and Bucky.
|
|
zephro
Junior Member
Posts: 3,010
|
Post by zephro on Apr 9, 2022 10:41:48 GMT
Last act of Shang Chi was naff. That's pretty much par for the course. Even the critically acclaimed MCU films like Black Panther can shit the bed at the end. I don't think Black Panther does particularly. But yeah its often the way. I'd say previously its been more of a DC problem; Wonder Woman being their best film where the 2nd act leads you to go "Oh maybe you can't just smash your way through humans being fucking awful" then no a big CGI villain just appears. Black Panther was always leading to a conflict with Killmonger and it was fairly well done (not the CGI the plot). So its at least earned on some level. Shang Chi appeared to be going for some sort of resolution between children and father that'd have had some emotional heft they'd earned, maybe a kung fu fight. But nah some big CGI monster just rocks up instead.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,645
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Apr 9, 2022 10:44:24 GMT
Black Panther is a famous bed shitter mostly because the final fight is absolutely woeful. Terrible CGI nonsense on CGI train tracks.
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Apr 9, 2022 10:45:14 GMT
I really, really, really, really wished they hadn't killed of Killmonger. Michael B Jordan was brilliant as him and really could have been a great antihero Black Panther in the upcoming sequel.
|
|
zephro
Junior Member
Posts: 3,010
|
Post by zephro on Apr 9, 2022 10:45:39 GMT
CGI in all of Black Panther was pretty bad, I more meant Killmonger's death was actually fairly well done. Michael B Jordon was really good I thought.
|
|
lexw
New Member
Posts: 858
|
Post by lexw on Apr 9, 2022 11:07:17 GMT
I guess what's fascinating here is that there's absolutely no consistency on which people think was "the best" or liked the most of the Marvel series. Something for everyone, maybe. Let's be honest, everything post End game has been _shite_ I don't think that's honest, I think it's a bit weird and opinionated, especially because it implies stuff before Endgame wasn't "shite", which seems like bollocks to me. I mean, Spider-Man: No Way Home was easily the best Tom Holland Spider-Man movie (of course there have been two post-Endgame and Far From Home was pretty weak) and one of the better and more human and humane MCU films period. The only other movies post-Endgame have been Eternal (beautiful and completely rubbish) and Shang-Chi which was a lot of fun though as Zephro correctly points out, had a crap final act (and some really shockingly bad SFX at times). All the rest is TV series, which clearly no-one agrees on the quality of (even WandaVision is significantly split between "Brilliant!" and "Okay, but a slog at times"). Personally the only TV series which came close to crap for me, despite liking the lead characters, was Falcon. I'm always happy to see more Anthony Mackie and Sebastian Stan on screen, both are funny and charismatic (Anthony Mackie nearly managed to save a terrible Netflix movie where he was an android a year or two ago, solely on the basis he was great in it, with an amazing psychotic gleam in his eye, Sebastian Stan is just effortlessly charming), but was annoyed that the writing just wimped out on everything, which dragged it down - as did the US Agent stuff, weirdly.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,645
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Apr 9, 2022 11:26:15 GMT
Top Tip: if you call something ‘weird and opinionated’, don’t do it before launching into a weirdly lengthy stream of opinions.
|
|
|
Post by simple on Apr 9, 2022 11:46:18 GMT
We all agree Black Widow and Eternals were the actual weakest ones though, right?
|
|
dogbot
Full Member
Posts: 8,738
|
Post by dogbot on Apr 9, 2022 11:48:54 GMT
Based on the things said here (and elsewhere in fairness), I've not watched Eternals. Black Widow was dull.
I like both Wandavision and Loki quite a lot, though and I thought that Falcon and Bucky was entertaining enough.
|
|
|
Post by Chopsen on Apr 9, 2022 11:52:58 GMT
I seem to be alone in this but the difference between them is barely perceivable to me.
The kind of thing that gets "OMFG this is the worst thing ever I can't believe this shit" is maybe a 6.5/10 and the "OMFG this is the best thing ever I can't believe this shit" is maybe a 7.5/10.
It all watchable fluff, and it's all *so* formulaic.
Eternals isn't great but it's not the worst way of spending a couple of hours of your life if you want to watch something very undemanding.
|
|
|
Post by Leolian'sBro on Apr 9, 2022 11:55:52 GMT
The MCU has been diminishing returns from way before Endgame. Everything after Winter Soldier was, on balance, not great aside from novelty value. They did show the way to do a decades-long plot arc though, so look forward to endless crap foreshadowing from other franchises in the future.
The Anthony Mackie robot-in-the-future film was kinda good as well. He’s great and I buy the war-torn urban setting. I forget what it’s called.
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Apr 9, 2022 11:56:21 GMT
We all agree Black Widow and Eternals were the actual weakest ones though, right? For me Eternals was the weakest, I was over BW as soon as it started as it didn't really add anything to her story but I was entertained to a degree. But Eternals was boring as hell, with people I didn't really care about, a plot I didn't really care about especially a plot that had end of the world stakes to it without the sufficient build up to it to earn it. I'm ok with saying I'm very much a fan of the Marvel machine but this was not the one.
|
|
dogbot
Full Member
Posts: 8,738
|
Post by dogbot on Apr 9, 2022 12:02:38 GMT
So it's all shit, except for the stuff that isn't and that's average but it's ok, because it's mostly pretty entertaining anyway.
Glad we cleared that up. 😁
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,645
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Apr 9, 2022 12:04:37 GMT
When 90% of them are mediocre and produced at the same level of basic competence, a stinker really stands out.
I mean, that was kind of their selling point. They delivered a consistent, repeatable experience so getting something that actually sucked out loud is a fairly big deal.
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Apr 9, 2022 12:05:36 GMT
So it's all shit, except for the stuff that isn't and that's average but it's ok, because it's mostly pretty entertaining anyway. Glad we cleared that up. 😁 Exactly. I am looking forward to the new Dr.Strange movie which is, forgive me for doing a Beastmaster, tracking numbers possibly close to No Way Home.
|
|
|
Post by simple on Apr 9, 2022 12:12:36 GMT
That Ant-Man 1 was my least favourite for awhile speaks to how consistent they are in general I think
|
|
Vandelay
Junior Member
Posts: 4,712
Member is Online
|
Post by Vandelay on Apr 9, 2022 12:33:15 GMT
I don't think they have been doing too badly post End Game. Black Widow wasnt great, but I enjoyed Florence Pugh's character and it was only really the final act that was meh. No Way Home was great and probably one of the best of all the Marvel films. Shang-Chi was much better than I was expecting.
It was only really Eternals that has been bad and even that I would say it was more bland than actively terrible.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Apr 9, 2022 13:16:37 GMT
I have enjoyed all their movies that I've seen, which I've said before is a pretty impressive feat when they're at 20+ movies and most franchises jump the shark around movie 2 or 3.
I find their tv shows much more inconsistent. I think it's because they can manage a fun ride 2hr movie in their sleep, but once it gets up to 10-12 hours the flaws start to show much more clearly.
Wandavision was half dull, half ok, with a fun villain. Falcon+Soldier was half good and then went to shit. Hawkeye was fun enough based on the great 2 main characters, but it was definitely dragged out far too long. Swamp Thing was the best one!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2022 13:32:37 GMT
I liked Black Widow, but yeah, Eternals was super boring.
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Apr 9, 2022 17:57:13 GMT
Watched ep1 and 2 of Moon Knight and yeah I'm liking this a lot.
|
|
lexw
New Member
Posts: 858
|
Post by lexw on Apr 9, 2022 18:47:58 GMT
I seem to be alone in this but the difference between them is barely perceivable to me. The kind of thing that gets "OMFG this is the worst thing ever I can't believe this shit" is maybe a 6.5/10 and the "OMFG this is the best thing ever I can't believe this shit" is maybe a 7.5/10. I mean I think what you're describing is true across a lot of our culture - certainly games. I honestly blame nerds. I'm not exactly sure how/why they/we did it, but 20 years ago, before Nerdic Domination of culture, there wasn't this binary where everything is Comic Book Guy "Worst.X.Ever." or "OMG THIS GIVES MY EMPTY LIFE MEANING! ANYONE WHO DISAGREES IS A DANGEROUS HERETIC!!!". And definitely virtually all Marvel stuff, films and TV exists in a sort of 6/10 to 8/10 realm with very little outside.
|
|
|
Post by Reviewer on Apr 9, 2022 19:35:13 GMT
They’re all competent or better. They’ve essentially replaced things like Armageddon and Independence Day type blockbusters but in successful franchise form.
I have no problem watching them, and the better ones I enjoy a lot for those crowd pleasing moments. The most recent ones have struggled to achieve that because they don’t have the character history of several films and it will feel like they’re worse without those peaks. They have also been some of the lesser films in the franchise, but still ok.
|
|
geefe
Full Member
Short for Zangief
Posts: 8,323
|
Post by geefe on Apr 9, 2022 21:46:34 GMT
They're ridiculously formulaic, really and the fandom of them is just nonsense. None of them are reinventing the genre like a Star Wars or Matrix. They're reasonably well done blockbusters that are run with precision. Yes, they're head and shoulders above Fast and Furious but they're also fairly skin deep and interchangeable.
|
|
lexw
New Member
Posts: 858
|
Post by lexw on Apr 10, 2022 12:02:49 GMT
None of them are reinventing the genre like a Star Wars or Matrix. They absolutely are, but they're doing it in a different way, which is to say, they're creating this whole "interwoven" approach to movies, the U in the MCU, which is not something that has really been done before - it's been touched on, but never in the same way, or to remotely the same degree. It's a more meta approach than an approach contained in a single movie, but it's absolutely having the same level of influence as SW or the Matrix, in terms of how its impacting movie-making. It has impacts within movies too, because they're conducted in a different way when they're part of a "universe". Also people are definitely more forgiving of mediocrity in the context of a "universe". Not just with movies - this is very obvious with long-running book series too - Brandon Sanderson has his "cosmere", which is a Brandon Sanderson Literary Universe - and the amount fans forgive the mediocre books because they're part of it is staggering. I'm not saying this to praise Marvel particularly, but I think it's easily as big a deal as SW/Matrix in terms of what its doing. I largely agree with "skin deep and interchangeable". One of the things I liked about No Way Home was that it had at least a scintilla of emotional depth, and the plotline was definitely not interchangeable with any other MCU movie, because it was about healing and forgiveness, not, basically vengeance or just stopping a baddie. It's actually been weird with stuff like Ant Man 2 where, you'd have thought healing/forgiveness might have been a theme, but it totally wasn't - they're just horrible to the villain, troubled as the villain clearly is and this despite Ant Man supposedly being a "good guy".
|
|
anephric
Junior Member
The first 6 I took out with a whirlwind kick
Posts: 1,511
|
Post by anephric on Apr 10, 2022 12:33:59 GMT
I think they are very much identikit in terms of cookiecutter style, with the odd slightly edgier Winter Soldier variant. But yes, in terms of universe/IP building, nothing has been done like that before in terms of cinema. You could argue shared universes/crossovers have existed for years in TV land (and obviously in Marvel's own comics medium) so it's not OMG AMAZEBALLS but yeah, no-one had really done that to that degree in film. And the planning is admirable, especially when compared to things like Star Wars which completely shat the bed and is mindboggling in comparison that they just winged it. I think most Star Wars fans would've volunteered a better five-year plan for free than what Lucasfilm farted out and paid people millions for.
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Apr 10, 2022 12:47:53 GMT
It's still baffling that they were just making things up as they went along with the current star wars film. But then I personally feel that they were like it's Star Wars people will just lap it up, maybe the Marvel formula had changed people's expectations of what a series of films could be, or more likely younger people who don't have the nostalgia that has made us look past the many many problems with the franchise.
|
|
|
Post by britesparc on Apr 10, 2022 13:16:01 GMT
I genuinely think they approached Star Wars with good intentions, wanting to be able to tout the films as "directors' movies", each with its own vision and creator. Also I think they had an idea of reflecting the fact that Lucas himself more or less made up everything as he went along, having very little idea for where the original trilogy went and only a bit more of an idea for the prequels. Now, obviously there are a lot of problems with this; for a start, audiences were used to a bit of a plan, especially with where the MCU was by 2015. But also The Force Awakens took a few left-field turns which kinda boxed subsequent writers into a corner; fine if JJ & co were following on directly, but hard to reconcile for someone new.
I just don't think there's anything in the history of the people involved to suggest they were cashing in and only banking on SW's past successes. I think they kinda cocked up a bit, but I think they DID have an idea of what they wanted it to be like, if that makes sense.
|
|
anephric
Junior Member
The first 6 I took out with a whirlwind kick
Posts: 1,511
|
Post by anephric on Apr 10, 2022 13:21:26 GMT
You're right in that Lucas mostly blagged it (and massively fell out with Gary Kurtz and Irvin Kershner with their darker, mid-series ideas for Empire when it potentially jeopardised his toyification and merchandising plans) and by ROTJ he was obviously completely blagging it.
But, as mentioned, that doesn't pass muster now that Marvel set the bar really high for planning, and the new SW films just seem really, uh, shit and back-of-serviette in comparison.
|
|