|
Post by Whizzo on Nov 13, 2023 12:56:50 GMT
(Honestly, these RHCP references are going over my head. I've not seen the film yet, so I'm assuming they will make sense when I do.) I have seen it, they make no sense at all.
|
|
|
Post by MolarAm🔵 on Nov 13, 2023 13:34:23 GMT
Looks it's fared poorly at the box office. They can't even Give It Away I love how you capitalised it to make sure, but still didn't get any bites
|
|
|
Post by simple on Nov 13, 2023 15:09:29 GMT
What Geefe got he gotta give to ya Molar
|
|
geefe
Full Member
Short for Zangief
Posts: 8,323
|
Post by geefe on Nov 13, 2023 15:20:20 GMT
Sniff, if anyone needs me I'll be
UNDER THE BRIDGE N D E R
T H E
B R I D G E
|
|
|
Post by Saul1138 on Nov 14, 2023 1:52:42 GMT
The RHCP reference is a personal thing. My brother in law fell asleep during one of the Spider-Man films. We teased him about what he had missed, but all bull shit, so it didn’t spoil it for when he went again. One of the things we joked about was the Peppers doing their entire library live. He loves them. It has became a reference point for me, even when he isn’t involved.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Nov 14, 2023 2:24:03 GMT
By the way, The Marvels has the lowest MCU opening ever, with about $47M. I'm still looking forward to taking the kids to see it next weekend though.
Weirdly, it's rotten tomatoes critics score is 62%, but its audience score is 84%. It's often been the other way around for big female-led movies due to the audience scores getting review bombed.
Maybe it's just above expectations. Or maybe we're just in a parallel universe.
|
|
|
Post by simple on Nov 14, 2023 8:02:55 GMT
Its broken $100m worldwide but apparently was the fourth most expensive MCU film to make ($250m+).
It probably doesn’t help that people like me are all just waiting for it to land on Disney+ sometime in the next two - three months. I’ve done it with all the recent movies but if its already under performing then that’s going to turn into a negative feedback loop of even more people sitting it out until it becomes available for “free” on the app at home.
|
|
|
Post by Vandelay on Nov 14, 2023 8:43:18 GMT
Weirdly, it's rotten tomatoes critics score is 62%, but its audience score is 84%. Funny the comparison with Metacritic. 50% critic rating (critic rating differences isn't that unusual, as people may give a very average score, but still not call it rotten, so often is a bit lower), but only a 3.6 user review rating. Interesting to see such a stark difference in user rating. Don't know if metacritic user scores tend to be lower, but that is a massive disparity between the two. I expect it is true that part of the box office issue is that a lot of people hold off until they are on Disney+. It would be interesting to see the Disney+ numbers and if Disney are happy with those (I'm sure they would rather them to be box office numbers even if they were pleased with them). Personally, even as someone who is stil reasonably favourable to the MCU films, I can't really imagine watching them on a small screen. They hold my attention well enough when blown up on a big screen and with limited distractions, but at home I think I would be staring at my phone within 20 minutes (I would say that is the case going right back as well and not just the current batch).
|
|
|
Post by beastmaster on Nov 14, 2023 8:54:51 GMT
You’ve also got to take account the marketing and the slice the studio gets from the BO. Needs to earn around $440 million to get back its production cost (minus marketing). Apparently studios can spend up to the films budget on marketing but let’s say it’s $210 million, then you’re looking at $650 million for break even.
Some YouTube channels are claiming it’ll need closer to $900 million to break even but that just seems to be people hating on the film.
Regardless, theses films are way too expensive. Next year Marvel only have Deadpool 3 (Kraven & Madame Web are Sony). That’s going to be a massive hit but does anyone care about films like Thunderbolts?
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,476
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Nov 14, 2023 9:03:04 GMT
By the way, The Marvels has the lowest MCU opening ever, with about $47M. I'm still looking forward to taking the kids to see it next weekend though. Weirdly, it's rotten tomatoes critics score is 62%, but its audience score is 84%. It's often been the other way around for big female-led movies due to the audience scores getting review bombed. Maybe it's just above expectations. Or maybe we're just in a parallel universe. There are probably a few ways you can interpret that data, right? Critics gave it a 6/10 'its ok' shoulder shrug so the only people going to see it are the Marvel Ultras who are predisposed to score it highly. Everyone else who remotely cares is waiting for it to drop onto D+. And, of course, the culture wars morons have moved onto something else. I think the biggest problem they are facing is, basically, apathy.
|
|
myk
New Member
Posts: 753
|
Post by myk on Nov 14, 2023 9:15:16 GMT
I do think they've picked a weak set of characters for the upcoming slate, and that generally there are too many.
|
|
|
Post by simple on Nov 14, 2023 10:21:33 GMT
Regardless, theses films are way too expensive. Next year Marvel only have Deadpool 3 (Kraven & Madame Web are Sony). That’s going to be a massive hit but does anyone care about films like Thunderbolts? Most of the Disney+ series have cost roundabout $200m each as well which won’t be helping Marvel’s case with Iger. Especially as at least half of them don’t look like it and they’re mostly too long and generally review as “broadly fine”. I do still enjoy the MCU but it is insanely costly to produce a franchise that is essentially an idle casual watch.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,476
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Nov 14, 2023 10:41:10 GMT
I think the most of them are averaging $25m an episode which at this point feels like some kind of tax scam.
|
|
|
Post by Reviewer on Nov 14, 2023 10:51:50 GMT
It’s amazing anyone involved greenlit anywhere near that kind of spend, or even that they spend that much. I don’t know why it irritates me so much, but when the quality is generally poor as well then a few people need different jobs.
I’m sure Loki could have been made on a Dr Who +50% scale budget.
|
|
Derblington
Junior Member
Did you know I have a girlfriend
Posts: 2,088
|
Post by Derblington on Nov 14, 2023 11:00:37 GMT
Its broken $100m worldwide but apparently was the fourth most expensive MCU film to make ($250m+). How? I've not seen it so I have no idea (it's the first Marvel film I'm not going to see in the cinema) but nothing in the trailers suggest it's on that kind of level.
|
|
|
Post by Saul1138 on Nov 14, 2023 11:33:28 GMT
Its broken $100m worldwide but apparently was the fourth most expensive MCU film to make ($250m+). How? I've not seen it so I have no idea (it's the first Marvel film I'm not going to see in the cinema) but nothing in the trailers suggest it's on that kind of level. Entirely shot on location, was a reason brought up previously.
|
|
|
Post by Reviewer on Nov 14, 2023 11:39:17 GMT
Those trips to other multiverses really add up.
|
|
Derblington
Junior Member
Did you know I have a girlfriend
Posts: 2,088
|
Post by Derblington on Nov 14, 2023 11:42:26 GMT
Reshoots, apparently.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,476
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Nov 14, 2023 11:48:43 GMT
The less charitable reviews do point out how it feels like at least three movies stitched together
|
|
|
Post by simple on Nov 14, 2023 12:30:54 GMT
I’d read it in the Guardian and this is the source they cite: www.the-numbers.com/movies/franchise/Marvel-Cinematic-Universe#tab=summary&franchise_movies_overview=od2I’m assuming looking at the general trend that these prices aren’t being adjusted for inflation since its broadly showing that newer equals significantly more expensive. Even so, and fully acknowledging that I’ve not seen it yet, $274m for the first 90 minute movie they’ve made in a decade seems insane. Especially when you see some of the films behind it and how expensive they looked.
|
|
|
Post by MolarAm🔵 on Nov 14, 2023 12:38:11 GMT
This is absolutely fascinating.
|
|
|
Post by Vandelay on Nov 14, 2023 12:47:31 GMT
Weird that Doc Strange 2 seems to have been the most successful of the post End Game films (excluding Spider-Man, obviously). Beating the original even, which is unusual in itself.
It was received as being ok, but I don't remember there being much positive buzz about it. It did have strong X-Men nods though. I suspect a good way for the MCU to get out of its current rut is to push on with getting X-Men going. Wolverine and co are clearly the biggest property they have access to, besides Spider-Man.
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Nov 14, 2023 12:52:00 GMT
I don't even know at this point. A lot of the draw would have been seeing the core Avengers interacting with people like Doom and the X-Men. I wonder if the general public have the energy anymore especially with how the Fox X-Men movies really went off the cliff financially and critically.
|
|
|
Post by simple on Nov 14, 2023 13:07:52 GMT
I think Strange 2 having the X-Men and Fantastic Four in it definitely helped. At the time it felt like maybe this would be the start of Marvel’s next big thing which reenergised the audience a bit. That they didn’t follow through immediately has probably cost them - even if it was known in nerd circles that they never intended too.
Despite Sony’s best efforts I think if Disney announced that the X-Men are back and that they plan on doing FF, Doom and Galactus right then there’s a lot of money it in for them.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,476
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Nov 14, 2023 17:02:00 GMT
It concluded the wanda story and came out on the back of a pretty well received wandavision, so it did have a pretty popular lead in which probably helped.
I went to see it purely because it was a Sam Raimi jam but I doubt that would have moved the needle much.
|
|
zephro
Junior Member
Posts: 2,917
|
Post by zephro on Nov 14, 2023 19:23:24 GMT
I just saw it because it was Sam Raimi, and enjoyed all the Sam Raimi bits of it.
Does anyone actually give a fuck about the Fantastic Four though? May be my own bias but I've just never known anyone to care or read them. Then again I feel the same about Captain America.
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Nov 14, 2023 20:01:53 GMT
I just saw it because it was Sam Raimi, and enjoyed all the Sam Raimi bits of it. Does anyone actually give a fuck about the Fantastic Four though? May be my own bias but I've just never known anyone to care or read them. Then again I feel the same about Captain America. They do have an uphill battle with FF as all of the earlier films have been bollocks, the last one being the worst. The only good thing about them is the supporting characters and villains they bring with them. I always thought a 60s set FF film could have done really well BUT when the MCU was at its peak. Now I'm not so sure, but Captain America in contrast to you has always been a character I've loved because he plays against the idea of a patriot being a puppet to their government and the films have been probably the best MCU stuff IMO.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,476
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Nov 14, 2023 20:06:14 GMT
I mean, that could work. They are science heroes so the world is their lobster. No reason they can’t time travel or get stuck in orbit, Buck Rogers style.
They could go absolutely balls out with them.
|
|
|
Post by simple on Nov 14, 2023 20:07:27 GMT
I think FF have enough name recognition that the MCU machine could generate real hype with them.
Lets not forget most of the original MCU movies were characters who weren’t popular enough to sell the rights too when they flogged X-Men, Spiderman and FF. And GOTG were completely off radar as household names go. Most of the MCU is B tier characters and their supporting cast, so I think they can turn FF around. Plus with either Doom or Galactus you’ve got two of the remaining decent baddies who could be worthy of being a proper big bad now Kang is dead in the water (and was rubbish anyway).
It probably hangs on the casting though. They need to keep Krasinski on board if its going to fly imo.
|
|
zephro
Junior Member
Posts: 2,917
|
Post by zephro on Nov 14, 2023 20:25:18 GMT
Like I know of Doctor Doom and such. For whatever reason none of the great storylines from the comics I can think of are Fantastic Four ones. Though yeah that'd also be true of Guardians of the Galaxy so fair enough. Also I reckon 50% of them are X-Men ones by Chris Claremont.
|
|