|
|
Post by starchildhypocrethes on Aug 12, 2022 12:10:54 GMT
It must have been worn down to a nub by your late teens.
|
|
|
|
Post by simple on Aug 14, 2022 8:19:56 GMT
How the fuck did this get through their ethics committee? And I know academia is competitive and you need to stand out but I’m not sure outing yourself as a bit of a nonce is the best way to do it |
|
|
|
Post by simple on Aug 15, 2022 17:18:26 GMT
The Benjamin Mendy accusations coming out of his trial are so much grimmer than I’d have guessed - and it was always going to be bad.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Aug 15, 2022 18:07:31 GMT
Yeah, I heard it on the news tonight. That's evil right there.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sarfrin on Aug 15, 2022 21:56:19 GMT
"Cray said there were five dates, between October 2018 and August 2021, when nine young women arrived at the footballer’s address and afterwards made complaints of rape and/or sexual assault against Mendy and Saha." And what the fuck were the police doing about it over those four years? Jesus Christ. Is it any wonder they thought they'd get away with it? They still might.
|
|
|
|
Post by simple on Aug 16, 2022 11:04:47 GMT
The premeditation, planning and systemisation of it are terrifying
|
|
|
|
Post by rawshark on Aug 16, 2022 13:37:25 GMT
This got me thinking about all the weird things I used to wank to as a kid before the internet came along. Blue Peter The News Wimbledon Countdown Gladiators I'm sure there's more... Are these weird? Let's analyse... Blue Peter - Katie Hill. Often in a swimsuit. No issues there. Wimbledon - sexy and it only got sexier as time went on. Nothing weird there. Countdown - I never was a Carol Vorderman fancier but I guess. The Rachel Riley years were faptastic. Gladiators - Jet. Absolutely nothing weird about that other than it being broken up by equal amounts of oily muscly men. Only one I think is slightly weird is the news as I never found any of the readers that erotic and you;d be interrupted more often than not with images of starving Ethiopians and Bob Geldof. |
|
|
|
Post by rawshark on Aug 16, 2022 13:39:58 GMT
Oh and catalogues were as erotic as hell.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chopsen on Aug 16, 2022 13:56:37 GMT
This leads me to the question: did weird fetishes become more or less common before the internet?
Before the internet, you'd be reduced to fapping over anagrams and Big Ben going boing. This would condition you to find the strangest things erotic.
After the internet, you'd at least find it easier to find actual sexual content to relieve yourself to, but the availability of weirdness became routine. It would normalise being aroused by kinky stuff.
Someone should do a study. Is your average boomer more or less kinky than gen x and below? A retrospective cohort study investigating the impact of the internet on sexual proclivities.
Science.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aunt Alison on Aug 16, 2022 14:04:58 GMT
nothing weird about that other than it being broken up by equal amounts of oily muscly men. Nothing weird about that |
|
cubby
Full Member
doesn't get subtext
Posts: 6,414
|
Post by cubby on Aug 16, 2022 14:07:27 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Nemesis on Aug 16, 2022 14:29:32 GMT
This got me thinking about all the weird things I used to wank to as a kid before the internet came along. Blue Peter The News Wimbledon Countdown Gladiators I'm sure there's more... Are these weird? Let's analyse... Blue Peter - Katie Hill. Often in a swimsuit. No issues there. Wimbledon - sexy and it only got sexier as time went on. Nothing weird there. Countdown - I never was a Carol Vorderman fancier but I guess. The Rachel Riley years were faptastic. Gladiators - Jet. Absolutely nothing weird about that other than it being broken up by equal amounts of oily muscly men. Only one I think is slightly weird is the news as I never found any of the readers that erotic and you;d be interrupted more often than not with images of starving Ethiopians and Bob Geldof. Katie Hill posted pics of her gash online if you're of a mind to visit old ground.... |
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Aug 16, 2022 14:40:56 GMT
This leads me to the question: did weird fetishes become more or less common before the internet? Before the internet, you'd be reduced to fapping over anagrams and Big Ben going boing. This would condition you to find the strangest things erotic. After the internet, you'd at least find it easier to find actual sexual content to relieve yourself to, but the availability of weirdness became routine. It would normalise being aroused by kinky stuff. Someone should do a study. Is your average boomer more or less kinky than gen x and below? A retrospective cohort study investigating the impact of the internet on sexual proclivities. Science. That's a really good question, I think the internet bringing many people together has definitely allowed people to explore the the things that they were thought they were alone in thinking. I think of things like cartoons where you had sexualised anthropomorphic animals and I suppose the internet has brought that kind of thing to its inevitable conclusion with Furries. Maybe the guy who did his PHD wanking over hentai boys could look into it |
|
|
|
Post by rawshark on Aug 16, 2022 15:36:19 GMT
nothing weird about that other than it being broken up by equal amounts of oily muscly men. Nothing weird about that Forgive me. Horses for courses. |
|
deebs
New Member
So I was killing this pig with a hammer
Posts: 790
|
Post by deebs on Aug 16, 2022 19:17:40 GMT
This leads me to the question: did weird fetishes become more or less common before the internet? Before the internet, you'd be reduced to fapping over anagrams and Big Ben going boing. This would condition you to find the strangest things erotic. After the internet, you'd at least find it easier to find actual sexual content to relieve yourself to, but the availability of weirdness became routine. It would normalise being aroused by kinky stuff. Someone should do a study. Is your average boomer more or less kinky than gen x and below? A retrospective cohort study investigating the impact of the internet on sexual proclivities. Science. That's a really good question, I think the internet bringing many people together has definitely allowed people to explore the the things that they were thought they were alone in thinking. I think of things like cartoons where you had sexualised anthropomorphic animals and I suppose the internet has brought that kind of thing to its inevitable conclusion with Furries. Maybe the guy who did his PHD wanking over hentai boys could look into it Taschen makes good money from selling books full of fetish shit from the 50s www.taschen.com/pages/en/catalogue/sex/all.htm |
|
|
|
Post by Danno on Aug 16, 2022 19:20:27 GMT
Vanessa better be worth it
|
|
|
|
Post by rawshark on Aug 17, 2022 1:31:32 GMT
Are these weird? Let's analyse... Blue Peter - Katie Hill. Often in a swimsuit. No issues there. Wimbledon - sexy and it only got sexier as time went on. Nothing weird there. Countdown - I never was a Carol Vorderman fancier but I guess. The Rachel Riley years were faptastic. Gladiators - Jet. Absolutely nothing weird about that other than it being broken up by equal amounts of oily muscly men. Only one I think is slightly weird is the news as I never found any of the readers that erotic and you;d be interrupted more often than not with images of starving Ethiopians and Bob Geldof. Katie Hill posted pics of her gash online if you're of a mind to visit old ground.... Well played, sir. |
|
Blue_Mike
Full Member
Meet Hanako At Embers
Posts: 5,430
|
Post by Blue_Mike on Aug 24, 2022 23:44:14 GMT
What the fuck kind of a statement is that?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2022 23:45:46 GMT
Basically legalese for "fuck ME? No, FUCK YOU."
but yeah, damn.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sarfrin on Aug 24, 2022 23:59:46 GMT
Basically legalese for "fuck ME? No, FUCK YOU." but yeah, damn. It's "they're to blame, not us" isn't it? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2022 0:08:50 GMT
That's the direct translation, yeah. There seems to be a bit of dgaf about their response though.
|
|
|
|
Post by elstoof on Aug 25, 2022 2:58:40 GMT
So the Prince of Pegging is moving to a cottage in Windsor, presumably for reasons completely unrelated to the fact his alleged mistress lived round the corner from their current Norfolk home
|
|
cubby
Full Member
doesn't get subtext
Posts: 6,414
|
Post by cubby on Aug 25, 2022 5:54:20 GMT
There must be more to that complaint than she spoke to Michaels at an after party, how does that implicate him?
|
|
Youthist
Junior Member
Enter your message here...
Posts: 1,989
|
Post by Youthist on Aug 25, 2022 6:57:28 GMT
Did anyone see the C4 documentary yesterday with Foxy, Gambaccini and Sir Cliff? I feel sorry for them sure but at the same time my mind cannot help think “they all got away with it”. Which is all kinds of wrong but hard to shake. Which is I guess a major point being made in the documentary about the media and these sorts of cases.
|
|
Ulythium
Full Member
Lily-livered
Posts: 7,145
Member is Online
|
Post by Ulythium on Aug 25, 2022 8:05:04 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by drhickman1983 on Aug 25, 2022 8:11:07 GMT
This leads me to the question: did weird fetishes become more or less common before the internet? Before the internet, you'd be reduced to fapping over anagrams and Big Ben going boing. This would condition you to find the strangest things erotic. After the internet, you'd at least find it easier to find actual sexual content to relieve yourself to, but the availability of weirdness became routine. It would normalise being aroused by kinky stuff. Someone should do a study. Is your average boomer more or less kinky than gen x and below? A retrospective cohort study investigating the impact of the internet on sexual proclivities. Science. Im pretty sure the Marquis De Sade predated the internet. |
|
cubby
Full Member
doesn't get subtext
Posts: 6,414
|
Post by cubby on Aug 25, 2022 12:21:19 GMT
Did anyone see the C4 documentary yesterday with Foxy, Gambaccini and Sir Cliff? I feel sorry for them sure but at the same time my mind cannot help think “they all got away with it”. Which is all kinds of wrong but hard to shake. Which is I guess a major point being made in the documentary about the media and these sorts of cases. Well yeah, the narrative is always "where there's smoke there's fire" with these stories. The allegation is reported, regardless of it's veracity because they know the public eats this shit up. This thread is an example of how quickly a celebrity's reputation can be turned to shit, even just by association, and even when they've been cleared. Private Eye knew that the guy who made claims against Cliff Richard was a full on fantasist, because they couldn't corroborate anything that he claimed, even small insignificant details were made up. But still the BBC didn't do any due diligence at all when he went to them after that. They were duped because both the post Savile culture meant they were being far more credulous with claims of this nature, as an attempt to correct for the culture of incredulity prior, and because it's novel. And novelty, regardless of whether it's true or not goes viral much much quicker than a truth that is mundane. news.mit.edu/2018/study-twitter-false-news-travels-faster-true-stories-0308 |
|
|
|
Post by simple on Aug 25, 2022 13:52:52 GMT
I know that post-Saville everyone was being rightly super cautious but there were some who no one seemed interested in whose (alleged) noncey behaviour had been public knowledge since the 60s and 70s. Basically the cool ones like Bowie, Jimmy Page and John Peel.
Although you could probably have arrested every performer on TOTP from the 70s and had a pretty high hit rate.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2022 14:12:16 GMT
There must be more to that complaint than she spoke to Michaels at an after party, how does that implicate him? I wondered that too. I'm also not sure Tracy Morgan is liable if the only thing mentioned is that he rented the after-party location. I could see the argument against Fallon though, if he and Sanz were drinking with the teenaged defendant and her friends. |
|
Lizard
Junior Member
I love ploughmans
Posts: 4,500
|
Post by Lizard on Aug 26, 2022 2:09:35 GMT
Still wouldn't be surprised if Cliff Richard is a nonce though.
|
|
