|
Post by Danno on Nov 16, 2023 0:22:23 GMT
I've spent enough time in both.
|
|
|
Post by simple on Nov 16, 2023 0:31:37 GMT
Just the name alone sounds like a talking head telling some poor reporter that Farage is just saying what we’re all thinking
|
|
|
Post by anthonyuk on Nov 16, 2023 1:04:33 GMT
It's awful and I feel an element of guilt saying it, but I feel to the average working class UK citizen, The Israel/Palestine conflict is filed alongside Yemen, Ukraine, Myanmar and countless other wars over the years. They shock, generate sympathy for all caught up in it, remind us time after time the evil humanity is capable of... all the while not really helping to pay the next winter energy bill and ballooning mortgage payment.
To a "white person"...I think the lack of cultural and historical understanding to a seemingly never ending conflict, on even a basic level is the main reason as to why it doesn't resonate quite the same to people within the Jewish and muslim community.
I think that's an unfortunate part of human nature above all else. It comes from the same place on how news stories focus on UK deaths around any form of war or tragedy as if that carries more weight, or why the UK Muslim community didn't protest over the million displaced in Myanmar. It's not a lack of awareness or even empathy, it just feels a world away from peoples own lives.
I am curious after what feels like actual genicide with the Uyghurs in China and even the war in Yemen, how it's the Palestine/Israel conflict that stirs up such strong emotion, obviously within the Muslim community, but also the worldwide community as a whole.
|
|
|
Post by Dougs on Nov 16, 2023 7:04:13 GMT
I find the whole parliamentary theatre on this slightly baffling. It's a sideshow and will have no impact on what is happening in Gaza at all. Smacks of arrogance, frankly.
|
|
|
Post by mothercruncher on Nov 16, 2023 7:28:04 GMT
There’s a chance it coincided with her just wanting an out and here was a peg to hang the coat on. Some people enjoy being in opposition.
|
|
askew
Full Member
Posts: 6,805
Member is Online
|
Post by askew on Nov 16, 2023 7:56:26 GMT
Remarkable that the opposition having a squabble is the lead story
|
|
|
Post by Dougs on Nov 16, 2023 8:18:05 GMT
Thought the same. But that's what happens when the other aide control the bulk of the media.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Nov 16, 2023 8:18:49 GMT
I assume Starmer felt he had to take a hard line on it because of the baggage remaining from the Corbyn/Antisemitism mess. If that wasn't a thing, I assume he'd have let them have a free vote.
It still seems like an unnecessary own goal though.
|
|
kal
Full Member
Posts: 8,309
|
Post by kal on Nov 16, 2023 8:27:43 GMT
I am curious after what feels like actual genicide with the Uyghurs in China and even the war in Yemen, how it's the Palestine/Israel conflict that stirs up such strong emotion, obviously within the Muslim community, but also the worldwide community as a whole. Myriad reasons for this, some innocent and reasonable, others less so. There is a danger of ‘whataboutery’ when it comes to this point, but it’s certainly interesting how little interest there is when Assad kills thousands of Palestinians or Egypt blockages theirs border with Gaza just like Israel do. It’s clearly not simply the “Palestinian cause” that drives so much interest in Israel’s behaviour.
|
|
|
Post by Dougs on Nov 16, 2023 8:28:04 GMT
@bill That's probably right, but It's just performative nonsense. By all means have a policy position but votes on ridiculous non-binding motions in parliament etc is utterly pointless. SNP saw an opportunity to damage Labour for their own benefit, which is pretty shameless when we're talking about people's lives.
|
|
|
Post by Chopsen on Nov 16, 2023 8:46:01 GMT
There's a certain type of person that seems to think this is important and the way to do things.
Like when the University College Union or the Welsh Senedd voted on motions about the Israel/Gaza situation. Like seriously dude, what's that going to achieve? Performative nonsense indeed.
Bet you countless Student Unions have done something similar.
|
|
|
Post by Reviewer on Nov 16, 2023 8:48:17 GMT
Too many of the opposition don’t seem to know that the best plan is often to keep quiet in public until it’s unavoidable.
There’s definitely a large appeal for some of them to just want to always be the opposition. It’s a lot easier to criticise than actually fix things and deliver.
|
|
|
Post by Chopsen on Nov 16, 2023 8:48:54 GMT
I mean *even in government* you wouldn't decide foreign policy to that level of granular detail of calling for a ceasefire in a foreign conflict by voting in HoC would you? That's not normal how this sort of thing happens is it? You'd leave it to the FO and diplomatic service to generally act in the nation's interest. Not be some backseat driver yelling from SW1 what they should be doing
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Nov 16, 2023 8:58:21 GMT
I'll take your word for it on the SNP thing as I have no idea. But given that the vote was happening, Starmer still had to make a decision on how to deal with it.
The logical thing would have been to make it a free vote, which would have avoided all the internal strife. But I assume they'd then have gotten hammered by the Tory press with the whole Corbyn thing that they seem happy to hammer Labour with at any opportunity. Since they're going to get hammered anyway, maybe he should have just made it a free vote.
As for individual MPs voting with their conscience. It might be a non-binding vote, but I'm not sure I want to criticise them for doing so. It might be meaningless internationally, but they're going to have it on their voting record and have to answer to constituents about it. Plus I'd rather have politicians who vote for what's right than unfailingly follow the party line.
It's a bit of a rock and a hard place thing, but given that it's basically non-binding, I can't help but think the free vote would have done a lot less damage.
|
|
|
Post by Reviewer on Nov 16, 2023 8:59:52 GMT
I could see a grandstanding backbencher trying it on but no, it doesn’t seem a sensible or constructive thing to do. I vaguely recall some doing something like it where it was us being actively involved in a conflict but that’s a bit different.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,634
Member is Online
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Nov 16, 2023 9:03:16 GMT
To be fair, there is the fact that he is the PM in waiting so at some point he actually is going to be in the hot seat and have to actually do something. Its a decent test and he is failing it, so I can see why some people are shitting their pants.
|
|
|
Post by gibroon on Nov 16, 2023 9:06:12 GMT
It's telling how much of democracy is "free" when you can't vote on a motion without asking permission from the head teacher. Fucking ludicrous and shows up the moronic state of play in Westminster. What is the issue here anyway? Just because UK calls for a ceasefire, are Israelis going to give a shit about that?
|
|
|
Post by Dougs on Nov 16, 2023 9:10:02 GMT
To be fair, there is the fact that he is the PM in waiting so at some point he actually is going to be in the hot seat and have to actually do something. Its a decent test and he is failing it, so I can see why some people are shitting their pants. I think he's done exactly what he would if he was in power. That some people in the party don't like it is fine, and right that they quit over it, and of course are free to vote as they see fit for whatever reason. But as I say, it has no meaningful impact on the war itself, and as Chops says, most of the work is done through diplomacy, not parliamentary grandstanding.
|
|
|
Post by Vandelay on Nov 16, 2023 9:11:21 GMT
I don't think it is particularly unreasonable for Labour to say their frontbenchers have to vote in a particular way on this, especially when it comes to something that the party has been very clear on its policy. If they were in government, they couldn't have members of their cabinet going off and calling for things that aren't government policy.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,634
Member is Online
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Nov 16, 2023 9:12:16 GMT
Yeah, he has, for better or worse. Its a window into his premiership and he is going to be the head prefect. Im not surpised JP quit. As you say, its a pointless hill to die on, though, but I suppose you have to purity test somehow.
|
|
kal
Full Member
Posts: 8,309
|
Post by kal on Nov 16, 2023 9:20:31 GMT
Again I really struggle to believe this was an issue that Jess Phillips saw herself being so principled over as to quit. I really suspect she simply felt she had no choice or perhaps wants out anyway.
It’s interesting that someone like Zarah Sultana who is extremely vocal and active on this issue is still there.
|
|
|
Post by gibroon on Nov 16, 2023 9:23:22 GMT
I don't think it is particularly unreasonable for Labour to say their frontbenchers have to vote in a particular way on this, especially when it comes to something that the party has been very clear on its policy. If they were in government, they couldn't have members of their cabinet going off and calling for things that aren't government policy. It's a vote for a ceasefire for more needed aid in that part of the world. It has little to do with the running of the UK. It's a question of conscience not politics. I suppose this is the crux of the issue, Britain still thinking they are relative in world politics, clinging on to the idea we are still an Empire. Like I said, I really don't think that Israel would give flying fuck what the UK thought or wanted.
|
|
nexus6
Junior Member
Posts: 2,527
|
Post by nexus6 on Nov 16, 2023 9:24:31 GMT
More focus on what labour are doing with the situation than the tories. Government in waiting
|
|
geefe
Full Member
Short for Zangief
Posts: 8,323
|
Post by geefe on Nov 16, 2023 9:27:00 GMT
I rather suspect user kal is suggesting that there are ulterior motives for some people wading into this debate.
In all seriousness though, it is just blatant anti Semitism at this point. Have these back benchers pointed out the things kal has? You'd be under the impression that it is literally only Israel that has an influence on the life of Johnny Gaza.
Nowhere have I seen criticism of the lack of coordination between neighbouring states. Why aren't these backbenchers calling for an international partnership, with cooperation between countries, to find a solution?
|
|
|
Post by grey_matters on Nov 16, 2023 9:34:18 GMT
It has to be the Corbyn/anti-semitism hangover. Otherwise, Starmer would surely just say "this is a nonsense student-politics level motion from the SNP. Of course we'll have it as a free vote, it's a load of performative bollocks" and just move on. I'd guess it's the threat of being fired for going against the whip is a bigger factor in any resignations.
|
|
kal
Full Member
Posts: 8,309
|
Post by kal on Nov 16, 2023 9:36:27 GMT
I rather suspect user kal is suggesting that there are ulterior motives for some people wading into this debate. In all seriousness though, it is just blatant anti Semitism at this point. Have these back benchers pointed out the things kal has? You'd be under the impression that it is literally only Israel that has an influence on the life of Johnny Gaza. Nowhere have I seen criticism of the lack of coordination between neighbouring states. Why aren't these backbenchers calling for an international partnership, with cooperation between countries, to find a solution? I’m not strictly saying that. Again there are myriad motives and many of them are fair, and some are in bad faith. I guess Israel is essentially a Western democracy and therefore it’s easier to try and solve the conflict through them rather than try and get Iran onside. But yes, it is definitely disproportionate the degree to which the conflict is positioned as Israel being the key antagonist.
|
|
mcmonkeyplc
Junior Member
General Martok Qapla!
Posts: 3,086
|
Post by mcmonkeyplc on Nov 16, 2023 9:39:01 GMT
It is just performative bullshit and sensible people will see that, however the looneys seem to be the swing voters these days so everyone has to pander to them.
Sigh.
|
|
|
Post by gibroon on Nov 16, 2023 9:41:36 GMT
I rather suspect user kal is suggesting that there are ulterior motives for some people wading into this debate. In all seriousness though, it is just blatant anti Semitism at this point. Have these back benchers pointed out the things kal has? You'd be under the impression that it is literally only Israel that has an influence on the life of Johnny Gaza. Nowhere have I seen criticism of the lack of coordination between neighbouring states. Why aren't these backbenchers calling for an international partnership, with cooperation between countries, to find a solution? Calling for a ceasefire is anti-Semitic? Well that's a sweeping generalisation. What about the Jews calling for a ceasefire? Are they also anti-Semitic? How can you have cooperation in a region to find a solution without a ceasefire?
|
|
Ulythium
Full Member
Lily-livered
Posts: 7,106
Member is Online
|
Post by Ulythium on Nov 16, 2023 9:42:36 GMT
It just seems so avoidable.
During a seven-day period in which Braverman went off the deep end in a national broadsheet, incited riots on Armistice Day, got herself fired, and was ruled against re the Rwanda debacle, all Labour had to do to come out smelling like roses was not shit the bed... and even that was too much to ask.
|
|
zephro
Junior Member
Posts: 3,009
|
Post by zephro on Nov 16, 2023 9:52:13 GMT
I guess Israel is essentially a Western democracy and therefore it’s easier to try and solve the conflict through them rather than try and get Iran onside. this is also why you can take diplomacy with them seriously re a ceasefire. Though let's be honest the US are the ones who they'll listen to. Hamas not so much. I don't mean this to excuse what's going on at hospitals and so on. But has anyone ever laid siege to a city in history and not caused a bloodbath? (Discounting the ones where they just surrender). As I'm just coming up with Mariupol, bits of the Syrian civil war, Leningrad, Stalingrad and Berlin. Which is only reaching back 80 years.
|
|