|
Post by Jambowayoh on Nov 15, 2023 20:22:29 GMT
Can someone explain to me why would Starmer actively fire people for signing the ceasefire petition and why would people quit the frontbench for something that has absolutely no effect in the real world?
|
|
Rich
Junior Member
Posts: 1,988
|
Post by Rich on Nov 15, 2023 20:25:59 GMT
I think that's a genuinely terrible decision from Jess. She does a huge amount of good domestic violence work and to give it up over what is essentially a performative trap is ludicrous.
It it may be what some of her constituents want, but how does dividing Labour and stepping away from power actually benefit them in the long run.
This is exactly what Starmer warns about when he talks about some Labour members wanting it to be a party of protest instead of a government.
|
|
kal
Full Member
Posts: 8,309
|
Post by kal on Nov 15, 2023 20:43:57 GMT
It’s quite surprising as she’s generally one of the more centrist ones, and was quite often on the ‘wrong side’ of the whole Corbyn carry on.
She must feel she has no choice.
|
|
|
Post by technoish on Nov 15, 2023 20:48:10 GMT
Should have let it be a vote of conscience given it wasn't going to pass. Or maybe Starmer is rightly focusing on discipline in the face of a a totally fractured and disrespectful tory party.
|
|
Lizard
Junior Member
I love ploughmans
Posts: 4,485
|
Post by Lizard on Nov 15, 2023 21:02:33 GMT
Simon Jenkins is a fucking bellend. Who writes books about pretty churches and any architecture after 1800 being shit I'm his spare time. Also inflation is falling. It's technically correct. It's just most people and most journalists are so mathematically illiterate that a derivative function is beyond them. See also velocity Vs acceleration. Or actually velocity Vs speed. His columns on architecture and housing are fucking hilarious. 'Don't build in the countryside' then 'no more tower blocks in our cities'. He's intellectually incontinent. Plus I think many old buildings look fugly, and many modern ones look cool. I detest the notion that everything has to be gothic, arts and crafts or neoclassical.
|
|
|
Post by simple on Nov 15, 2023 21:44:49 GMT
Should have let it be a vote of conscience given it wasn't going to pass. Or maybe Starmer is rightly focusing on discipline in the face of a a totally fractured and disrespectful tory party. Yeah to choose a non-binding amendment from a minority party on the opposition benches to be the hill you’re willing to stake your credibility as leader on is a weirdly stubborn choice. I think I agree that you could make this a vote of conscience and spin the outcome as being evidence of your broad church instead of drawing a line in the stand. Or he could even just say, abstain as this is a generic call for ceasefire not a concrete plan for one. Either would probably have saved him from this hole he’s dug.
|
|
Ulythium
Full Member
Lily-livered
Posts: 7,106
Member is Online
|
Post by Ulythium on Nov 15, 2023 22:01:35 GMT
I guess we should never underestimate Labour's ability to shoot itself in both feet simultaneously.
Imagine seeing the Tories' ongoing public implosion, and instead of pulling together to present a compelling, functional alternative, you just say, "Hold my beer."
FFS.
|
|
|
Post by elstoof on Nov 15, 2023 22:10:12 GMT
Alternatively, getting rid of those who’ll take a token personal stand against the party is better for Starmer to do now than later
|
|
zephro
Junior Member
Posts: 3,009
Member is Online
|
Post by zephro on Nov 15, 2023 22:21:16 GMT
Simon Jenkins is a fucking bellend. Who writes books about pretty churches and any architecture after 1800 being shit I'm his spare time. Also inflation is falling. It's technically correct. It's just most people and most journalists are so mathematically illiterate that a derivative function is beyond them. See also velocity Vs acceleration. Or actually velocity Vs speed. His columns on architecture and housing are fucking hilarious. 'Don't build in the countryside' then 'no more tower blocks in our cities'. He's intellectually incontinent. Plus I think many old buildings look fugly, and many modern ones look cool. I detest the notion that everything has to be gothic, arts and crafts or neoclassical. Yeah he just has no actual taste. Like some posh prick who has only listened to classical music and thinks modern music all sucks. Rather than a sane view that a load of classical is wank and lots of modern stuff is good. Picking a side is just narrow minded idiocy.
|
|
|
Post by eleven63 on Nov 15, 2023 22:24:03 GMT
I guess we should never underestimate Labour's ability to shoot itself in both feet simultaneously. Imagine seeing the Tories' ongoing public implosion, and instead of pulling together to present a compelling, functional alternative, you just say, "Hold my beer." FFS. This. You are smashing it in the polls, basically pissing all over the shit party.... And now you decide to point both barrels at your feet. This makes him look weak, the last thing we need right now. I give up. ✌️
|
|
|
Post by bichii2 on Nov 15, 2023 22:24:47 GMT
I guess we should never underestimate Labour's ability to shoot itself in both feet simultaneously. Imagine seeing the Tories' ongoing public implosion, and instead of pulling together to present a compelling, functional alternative, you just say, "Hold my beer." FFS. Yes but it's a situation that brings on strong reactions and many labour MPs care deeply about the ceasefire vote. Yeah it won't actually make difference and they know that. They are taking a moral position and they feel that is more important than their jobs or the Likelihood of labour winning the election. I'm a labour voter but I'm also very passionate about this and perhaps stupidly I will unlikely now vote labour now in the next election. Hamas are fucked up terrorists who hate Israel, the Israel government are fucked up and now highly influenced by extremist right wing members including their defence chief who was deemed a terrorist in the past and has been at protests with the people in attendance chanting death to the Arabs. . It's not hard to call for a ceasefire as the opposition when a big chunk of your MPs and your voters want it. Yep it won't make a difference but the UK governments always pretend to be the good guys, high morals etc so when you get the opportunity to call for peace and don't then I don't know what.
|
|
zephro
Junior Member
Posts: 3,009
Member is Online
|
Post by zephro on Nov 15, 2023 22:29:20 GMT
I assume Starmer/Labour are attempting to project actual foreign policy they'd do in government not gestures. As opposed to Liz Truss in a hat.
I don't know what the trade off is. Votes Vs column inches probably. Possibly losable votes Vs useful column inches.
Ultimately none of it really matters as it's all just narcissistic British politics relative to what's actually happening in Gaza.
|
|
|
Post by Chopsen on Nov 15, 2023 22:37:18 GMT
Alternatively, getting rid of those who’ll take a token personal stand against the party is better for Starmer to do now than later I think it's a genuinely difficult one to call.
In truth, the next GE is still a while off most probably. A week is a long time in politics and all that. This could be long forgotten drama in a few months, and the kind of people who are likely to cause needless drama in an election campaign (willing to sabotage success for ideology) are now nicely sidelined.
Alternatively, it lays the ground nicely for the Labour version of ERG/"The Bastards" who can group together in the backbenches and continue to snipe away, and have a looooooooooooong time to case attrition, bit by bit, to the leadership and erode the image of coherence and competence.
What I don't have a good feel for is much the "Pro-Palestinian" contingent of labour voters (and for that matter of the general electorate) actually matters as a constituency. Yeah yeah 300k on a march, but marches mean very little in our electoral system, empirically. How geographically concentrated they are in marginal lab/con constituencies matters more. Also "Pro-Palestinian" in scare quotes because that presupposes an "Anti-Palestinian" constituency to take advantage of that I don't think is a thing.
I guess we'll see in the polling on voting intention over the coming months.
|
|
|
Post by Chopsen on Nov 15, 2023 22:38:59 GMT
Ultimately none of it really matters as it's all just narcissistic British politics relative to what's actually happening in Gaza. This, times a million.
|
|
zephro
Junior Member
Posts: 3,009
Member is Online
|
Post by zephro on Nov 15, 2023 22:39:38 GMT
That's what I meant by losable votes. If they're all in Labour safe seats...
|
|
|
Post by TheSaint on Nov 15, 2023 22:40:38 GMT
Yeah this labour civil war on Israel has been going on for a few weeks and in that time they have been increasing their lead over the tories. I don’t think the public are really paying attention.
|
|
|
Post by Chopsen on Nov 15, 2023 22:42:44 GMT
Exactly. Lose 2k votes in seat with a 20k labour majority: big woop. You only need to win by 1.
|
|
|
Post by Dougs on Nov 15, 2023 22:48:01 GMT
A lot of it feels like more social media nonsense, rather than a sizeable chunk of constituents. Agree that it's likely this will be forgotten in a few weeks.
|
|
|
Post by bichii2 on Nov 15, 2023 22:57:05 GMT
Not sure where you lot live but I live in London, obviously with a mix of cultures and backgrounds and it's a big deal.
The official figures have always been low balled and last week was "officially" 300,000+ but if you search any of the drone footage it's miles of people which = a hell of a lot more than 300,000. How many topics in the UK draw 300,000+ people to march every week for a month+?
Maybe in smaller white towns it's a non issue and won't affect the votes. I guess it will be more of a factor in the largest cities.
No shocker that a lot of the labour MPs resigning are from various cultural backgrounds and therefore are far more passionate about it.
|
|
zephro
Junior Member
Posts: 3,009
Member is Online
|
Post by zephro on Nov 15, 2023 23:02:03 GMT
Yeah. I think most people on the march were doing so with good intentions so this isn't directed at people with basic decency and sympathy.
But I just see a lot of people using this as politics. Tankies on the left, Braverman and Tommy Robinson on the right. Even Sunak because he smells some Labour weakness. It's all just naval gazing and crass relative, to the actual horror going on. All the while British Jews, in particular, and British Muslims are just caught in the middle.
On this one I'd rather a sane cross bench consensus around something leading to a 2 state solution, formed and people treated it as such. Kind of like Ukraine. And yes that is far closer to the Starmer/Lammy approach. As I just can't work out how you do a deal with Hamas or root Hamas out in any humane way. I know I have no answers, and doubt many other people do either.
Edit: I live in North Islington. For clarity not some small white town. Though I did grow up in one.
|
|
|
Post by Chopsen on Nov 15, 2023 23:10:33 GMT
Saying that this is back of a fag packet calculations is offensive to fag packets. HOWEVER: 300,000 is a lot of people in one place. These protests aren't just Londoners, they come from across the country. 300,000 as a percentage of the population (66m) is a fraction of a percent. If you assume it affects all constituencies equally, it rapidly becomes a rounding error. Most constituencies have >10% majorities, and the number with a majority of a 1% or less is 12, and they're all pretty evenly mixed across which parties hold that. Labour have a lot of constituencies with very large majorities. 16 of the top 20 constituencies by size of the majority are labour seats. They have very geographically concentrated voters. This has the downside of not returning many *seats* for the size of the votes they get, but protects them from national swings *against* them. electionresults.parliament.uk/election/2019-12-12/Statistics/MajoritySo yeah, 300k is a big number. The electorate is bigger still. A lot bigger. And this is without even considering the fact that issues which motivate voter intention is concentrated is a very small number of domestic issues. Middle east does not factor that highly.
|
|
|
Post by bichii2 on Nov 15, 2023 23:15:19 GMT
Yeah 300,000 is low Vs the total population but it's huge numbers of people actually bothering to march for something.
I can't think of anything else as big that's gone on every weekend??
And yeah it's way more. I goto the carnival every year, it's packed and police estimate 1,000,000 on the Mondays. These protests have been miles in length and full as far as you can see on the drone cameras.
What ever the numbers nothing else has driven so many people to make the effort to join a protest.
|
|
Vandelay
Junior Member
Posts: 4,701
Member is Online
|
Post by Vandelay on Nov 15, 2023 23:23:56 GMT
Worth also noting that the second referendum marches supposedly hit a million people at their peak. The parties that were sympathetic to those marchers' position didn't fare very well.
It should also be a distant issue by the time we have an election (hopefully for those directly involved). There likely will still be a few that won't vote Labour for their stance at the moment, but it will be minimal. It's also not like those that don't vote Labour over their Israel/Palestine are going to switch their vote to Tory.
|
|
zephro
Junior Member
Posts: 3,009
Member is Online
|
Post by zephro on Nov 15, 2023 23:24:42 GMT
It's up there but nothing else, isn't right en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_protests_in_the_United_KingdomIt's amusing how wildly the organiser, police and third party estimates vary so much. Anyhow Stop the War 2003 remains the biggest at somewhere around 1 million though the organisers claimed an additional 500k. The second EU referendum ones are also in the rough ballpark. Both Iraq and 2nd referendum did not change the elections afterwards.
|
|
|
Post by Chopsen on Nov 15, 2023 23:27:34 GMT
The Iraq War protests had 1.5m people marching against labour policy. Labour won the general election soon after. Like I said: empirically protests don't matter for elections in the UK.
edit: Ha. Zepho types quicker.
|
|
zephro
Junior Member
Posts: 3,009
Member is Online
|
Post by zephro on Nov 15, 2023 23:31:18 GMT
I'm glad I looked it up though as I thought the 2010 student protests were way bigger than they were. Not even top 20.
I do remember 2003. I sort of loitered around the edges of the Manchester demonstration then went to the pub as I couldn't be fucked getting a Megabus to London. Plus I was a student and therefore skint.
|
|
|
Post by Whizzo on Nov 15, 2023 23:37:06 GMT
Worth also noting that the second referendum marches supposedly hit a million people at their peak. The parties that were sympathetic to those marchers' position didn't fare very well. If you look really, really closely you may see me spending my birthday on that march. Well you wouldn't be able to see me as the footage isn't good enough but it was fucking rammed.
|
|
|
Post by simple on Nov 16, 2023 0:01:38 GMT
People are notoriously bad at judging big numbers and assessing crowd sizes.
300k feels like a low estimate for the big one at the weekend but there is a standard methodology which the Police usually use for these counts. I saw people on social media saying a million but that is obviously a massive over estimation. The true figure is probably sub-500k but over the 300k depending on time and location of the count.
That said, once you factor in all the other marches and vigils in other cities you could be into high hundred thousands. But you do have to take into account how poor people are at scaling, as in to get to a million nationwide you’d need multiple 100k+ protests and I don’t think that was reported anywhere even by organisers.
Even the bottom estimates and counts are still very significant numbers for marches in the UK though.
Question then is how significant is it electorally and the answer is probably not very. As disappointing as it is, the odds are that the next general election (like virtually all GEs) will be fought and lost on domestic policy and by the time it comes are in May, October or November even most people who are saying they’ll never vote Labour again will hold their noses and vote against the Tories.
Don’t forget Tony Blair won the 2005 general election by campaigning on domestic policy despite Iraq and Afghanistan being in the news right up to polling day. Foreign policy rarely alters who the ultimate victor even when its current.
Not that I think Starmer was right, I don’t really get why he chose this position unless he’s really that scared of the Mail calling him a terrorist sympathiser, I’m just trying to extrapolate how things will play out for him.
|
|
|
Post by Danno on Nov 16, 2023 0:12:26 GMT
I must say it's truly impressive to get sacked as Home Secretary TWICE and still be an absolute colossal prick about it without a shred of humility while crowing about your own imagined successes. Well you've never been from Fareham
|
|
|
Post by Danno on Nov 16, 2023 0:16:49 GMT
Oh and Fareham + Waterlooville? Don't get excited, same shit smaller town with even smaller ideas of how politics should operate. And Fareham is already the absolute squeezed out colostomy bag of political ideology somehow squeaking or squawking out its final vestige of shit into government
|
|