Ulythium
Full Member
Lily-livered
Posts: 7,112
|
Post by Ulythium on Nov 14, 2023 11:19:09 GMT
I have always said you could go full ancient greek and pick a government randomly from the population and they would have done a better job with covid. That said, there is probably a sliding doors universe with Corbyn victorious and less people died but we are all living in tents or something.
Sounds like a lifestyle choice to me.
|
|
|
Post by GigaChad Sigma. on Nov 14, 2023 11:26:18 GMT
Blatant theft of public funds, PPE scandals and obscene hypocrisy aside I don't think any government can do anything about a global airborne virus.
The primary function is to pretend that there is a plan to avoid mass hysteria.
The Tories failed at that pretty miserably but in reality every country is Chief Wiggum shooting germs.
|
|
kal
Full Member
Posts: 8,309
|
Post by kal on Nov 14, 2023 11:44:58 GMT
I seem to remember for the most part the Tories deferred to the guidance of independent advice, which is in likelihood is what Labour also would have done.
But yes, you’d have thought/hoped they wouldn’t have abused the opportunity to make money off it in quite the same way.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,634
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Nov 14, 2023 11:53:34 GMT
Blatant theft of public funds, PPE scandals and obscene hypocrisy aside I don't think any government can do anything about a global airborne virus. Thats not entirely true. Our pathetic response was also partially due to piss poor preparation. You would hope if Labour were in office that an adult would have seen long standing 'an airborne virus will fuck the entire country' audit findings and actually acted on them. If we had just done the absolute bare minimum it would have mitigated some of the shitty decisions these idiots had to make up on the hoof. I appreciate that 100% of the governments mental bandwidth was taken up with brexit but it is an absolute dereliction of duty to assume thats literally the only thing of note that will happen during your term in office and on that front I'm sure Labour/anyone would have done better.
|
|
|
Post by Chopsen on Nov 14, 2023 11:58:37 GMT
There was quite a bit of politicking and flip flopping initially based on purely political concerns (the initial stance was to basically ignore it despite what was happening in Italy).
|
|
|
Post by Vandelay on Nov 14, 2023 12:02:57 GMT
There were certainly plans in place for such an event and we already knew they were insufficient a good few years before COVID hit. If I remember correctly, it was David Cameron that decided to not pay any attention to the findings when the plans were trialed.
Plus, quite a few nations had gone through SARs and had learning from that. Many of them managed relatively well with COVID (such as Japan and Vietnam). No reason why we couldn't have had conversations with them to see what actually works.
|
|
|
Post by drhickman1983 on Nov 14, 2023 12:05:13 GMT
The Tories did defer to advice during covid, but seemingly, and how they acted on the advice did seem shambolic (and at times full of cronyism).
The general mood seemed to be "ignore advice until it becomes too big an issue to do so, then flip-flop around and try to make ourselves look good".
(I've said it before but Thatcher would have been good for COVID. Utterly horrific for everything else, but she had a track record of actually listening to scientific consensus and treating threats like this seriously (eg. Her stance on climate change.))
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,634
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Nov 14, 2023 12:06:35 GMT
There was quite a bit of politicking and flip flopping initially based on purely political concerns (the initial stance was to basically ignore it despite what was happening in Italy). Purely politics to not nix flights from china, too
|
|
|
Post by Duffking on Nov 14, 2023 12:15:19 GMT
There was quite a bit of politicking and flip flopping initially based on purely political concerns (the initial stance was to basically ignore it despite what was happening in Italy). This was fucking infuriating at the time, everyone was talking about the 2 week incubation period before symptoms, our press was gawking at the situation in Italy and being all "good job it's not us! Look at what a shitshow these european countries are lolol", and they were STILL like "well we'll just lock down if it gets bad" even though it was blatant from Italy that if you wait until it's bad then that's already too late because of the 2 week incubation period. Of course when we had it even worse suddenly the press gawking stopped
|
|
|
Post by simple on Nov 14, 2023 12:35:49 GMT
Purely for the agony of watching the coverage it would have been “interesting” to see how Jezza vs Piers Corbyn would have played out given his brother’s attempt to be the new David Icke
|
|
zephro
Junior Member
Posts: 3,010
|
Post by zephro on Nov 14, 2023 12:40:12 GMT
Who knows how Corbyn would have dealt with Covid. I don’t think anyone really has any sense of what kind of PM he would have been because he rarely talked about domestic policy in a meaningful way beyond 6th form politics type “free broadband” ideas. He’s never really been a proper politician. He’s a classic fringe type with very strong vocal opinions on very specific issues, in his case foreign policy. This is the key thing. Corbyn basically only talks about foreign policy, as it's his only real interest. Though his takes on that are so incredibly dumb most the time I suspect his ability to analyse problems and make decisions are fucking useless. If you're shit at the thing you spend all your time thinking about it does not bode well for the other stuff. So come covid the only reason it could have worked out better would be that John McDonnell knew what he was doing, along with Diane Abbot at Home Secretary and Jonathan Ashworth (no me either) as Health Secretary. Can't be as fucking useless as Matt Hancock is the only thing to say.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Nov 14, 2023 13:03:12 GMT
Watching from outside, it seemed that the UK was doing about as well as many other countries, and seemed (at least) to be more led by science than a lot of them. Politicians in every country were basically clueless about what to do, and most experts seemed to disagree as well.
In terms of deaths and finances, the UK seems to have come out of it worse than many countries. But that's partly because they went all-in on lockdowns and financial support (a very non-Tory thing to do).
With hindsight, maybe softer lockdowns and prioritizing the economy might have worked better. But even that's not really clear as there's still not much clarity on why some countries seemed to get hit much harder than others.
I'm happy to criticise the Tories and Boris for lots of stuff, but I doubt anyone else would have done much better/different. And if they did do better it'd probably have been largely luck. Not that they didn't make mistakes.
|
|
|
Post by Dougs on Nov 14, 2023 13:06:48 GMT
The issue wasn't just the final policy decisions (care homes, eat out just 2 appalling decisions) but also timing. They dithered so much that we ended up in lockdown for much longer than others.
|
|
cubby
Full Member
doesn't get subtext
Posts: 6,371
|
Post by cubby on Nov 14, 2023 13:08:45 GMT
Yeah we were in lock downs for way longer because they always fucking delayed it until they couldn't do anything else. If we'd have locked down sooner I'm sure we'd have been able to get back to relative normalcy sooner.
|
|
|
Post by Whizzo on Nov 14, 2023 13:12:16 GMT
They squandered all the warnings, paid lip service to scientific advice and thought the bullshit that got them elected would work against a mindless virus because it worked on mindless voters.
The COVID Inquiry has shown how incompetent they were and it's only at phase one, 231,000 people died on their watch and a lot of those deaths are directly on them.
And our current Prime Minister's great idea? Eat Out to Help Out was so bloody obviously mental, it's such bad judgment he should never have been made Prime Minister.
|
|
Ulythium
Full Member
Lily-livered
Posts: 7,112
|
Post by Ulythium on Nov 14, 2023 13:13:46 GMT
The Tories were typically focused on what would make for better politics, rather than what would be best for the country.
Remember when we were going to be allowed to travel and mingle freely in December 2020? Johnson and co. were so worried about being portrayed as The Grinches Who Cancelled Xmas that they left it until the 11th hour before scrapping those plans, which were fucking stupid anyway - did they think they'd negotiated a seasonal ceasefire with the virus or something?
|
|
|
Post by DJCopa on Nov 14, 2023 13:14:20 GMT
'Eat Out to Help Out' is still one of the maddest things that they are definitely responsible for.
edit - also just a porno slogan!
|
|
cubby
Full Member
doesn't get subtext
Posts: 6,371
|
Post by cubby on Nov 14, 2023 13:16:23 GMT
On this occasion they should have taken advice from DJ Khaled regarding eating out.
|
|
|
Post by Whizzo on Nov 14, 2023 13:20:11 GMT
It never made sense to me that Eat Out to Help Out wasn't Eat At Home to Help Out, discount takeaway and delivery orders and the businesses would get custom that way rather than gathering people together to spread the virus.
|
|
|
Post by DJCopa on Nov 14, 2023 13:22:10 GMT
It never made sense to me that Eat Out to Help Out wasn't Eat At Home to Help Out, discount takeaway and delivery orders and the businesses would get custom that way rather than gathering people together to spread the virus. That's a sensible option. They were obsessed with getting people outside, get back to normal, blitz spirit, etc. Bonkers!
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Nov 14, 2023 13:27:03 GMT
'Eat Out to Help Out' is still one of the maddest things that they are definitely responsible for. edit - also just a porno slogan! We had a similar scheme here.
Plus one to encourage people to travel. (!)
The gov here was much more focused on helping out the hospitality industry and on the economy than on things like lockdowns.
Plus we didn't get our vaccinations until much later, there was almost no testing available, and you had to pay about 15 quid for each test if you could find one.
|
|
|
Post by Reviewer on Nov 14, 2023 13:29:59 GMT
It never made sense to me that Eat Out to Help Out wasn't Eat At Home to Help Out, discount takeaway and delivery orders and the businesses would get custom that way rather than gathering people together to spread the virus. That's a sensible option. They were obsessed with getting people outside, get back to normal, blitz spirit, etc. Bonkers! They wanted people to get back in the cities and a reason to stop giving money to the hospitality industry. What they care about is extremely selective.
|
|
|
Post by Vandelay on Nov 14, 2023 13:36:17 GMT
The first part of the pandemic was probably more forgivable (with the exception of releasing untested hospital patients to care homes), even if they were certainly slow to act. From Eat Out to Help Out onwards it was a total disaster and they were constantly delaying everything in the hope that it would just work out all fine. They eventually got lucky in Winter of 2021 when the latest variant turned out to be less harmful, so there encouragements for everyone to go out and lick faces wasn't the same disaster it had been the previous 3 or 4 times.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,634
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Nov 14, 2023 13:43:44 GMT
I'm happy to criticise the Tories and Boris for lots of stuff, but I doubt anyone else would have done much better/different. Well, this is kind of the point, right? You'd hope *anyone* else wouldnt have been in those various positions in the first place. Yeah, every country had their own crosses to bear but we frequently found ourselves in a crisis of our own making. We were criminally under prepared for a pandemic, our health service has absolutely no surge capacity, our government was stacked with ludicrously unqualified people who frequently avoided making any decision until it was too late.... I mean, its all there in black and white in the covid enquiry. So, yeah, I genuinely believe the opposite. I honestly believe it would be impossible to do worse unless you are actively trying to kill people.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Nov 14, 2023 14:00:02 GMT
We were criminally under prepared for a pandemic, our health service has absolutely no surge capacity, our government was stacked with ludicrously unqualified people who frequently avoided making any decision until it was too late.... All true here as well. We just lucked out in that the number of cases here never went high enough to go over capacity.
Our surge capacity was about 100th of the UK's. Decisions here basically copied the UK, but came months later. Etc..
I'm still not sure if it's down to social habits (shaking hands vs bowing, talking vs not talking etc..), obesity levels, wearing masks or something different, but I'm pretty sure we didn't get dramatically lower cases because of government decisions. It's a bit of a puzzle.
But if we'd had half the number of cases that the UK had had then everything would have fallen apart dramatically.
|
|
zephro
Junior Member
Posts: 3,010
|
Post by zephro on Nov 14, 2023 14:01:48 GMT
Yeah but there was only a few months after 2019 to fix any of that. So that's testing Corbyn Vs May or Milliband Vs Cameron elections. The endemic problems were not getting fixed between December 2019 and February 2020 no matter who won.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,634
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Nov 14, 2023 14:06:55 GMT
Thats true. Its so weird. I'm watching covid era stuff on TV now thinking how it seems like a million years ago. My perception of the timeframes is so fucked.
|
|
mcmonkeyplc
Junior Member
General Martok Qapla!
Posts: 3,088
|
Post by mcmonkeyplc on Nov 14, 2023 14:24:11 GMT
I think everyone's perception of time post 2020 is fucked.
Probably an interesting study in how being holed up screws perception in time, for pretty much the entire planet.
|
|
geefe
Full Member
Short for Zangief
Posts: 8,323
|
Post by geefe on Nov 14, 2023 14:26:43 GMT
It is absolutely mad. Fascinating case study for future and it's crazy just what the impact had on mental health and development for young people.
|
|
Ulythium
Full Member
Lily-livered
Posts: 7,112
|
Post by Ulythium on Nov 14, 2023 14:32:12 GMT
I still find myself thinking, "When did I last [see this person] [go to that shop] [etc.] - pre-COVID, or post-COVID?"
|
|