|
Post by Bill in the rain on Oct 12, 2023 8:13:06 GMT
Having educational materials/services/etc.. be VAT free doesn't seem terrible to me. But in terms of priorities I would say giving more funding to state schools is higher than giving lower prices for private schools.
If the additional tax revenue is put back into the state system then it should balance out. Though as always I'm cynical.
Personally, I went to private secondary school and I'm not sure my parents could have afforded it if it was 20% more expensive, as they struggled to pay for it as it was. I was having some issues at school and it gave me a chance to overcome those, so I'm very grateful. However I'm also aware that I benefitted in a way that others didn't, and that was largely down to money.
|
|
otto
New Member
Posts: 980
|
Post by otto on Oct 12, 2023 8:36:46 GMT
I think the state sector needs a hell of a lot more investment than anything that could be brought in by slapping VAT on school fees. Having a private sector is intrinsically unfair, but so is practically everything in a capitalist economy. Like I said, I'd be delighted if we had a state system along the same lines as the one in Belgium, for example, which is where I work. God knows it would be a massive load off if we didn't have to pay for school fees. But the UK is so fucked, I've stopped worrying about doing 'selfish' things like pay to give my kids a better education or pay for better healthcare, because refusing to do that on a point of principle is pissing in the wind, and an act of self-harm. The UK needs decades of investment that can only come from a completely overhauled tax system and that can only happen if we have a completely overhauled political system which means a completely overhauled society, so don't hold your breath.
|
|
|
Post by Dougs on Oct 12, 2023 8:47:30 GMT
Absolutely agree that state education needs massive investment. In the infrastructure as well as the teachers. The system is fucked, people are leaving in droves (my wife included) as the stress and pay don't quite equate. The constant oversight and admin is so disproportionate. Throw in a lack of interest in non-core subjects and it's not hard to see why many turn to private education if they can afford to.
One of my mate's (very much not wealthy) has had to put both of his into a private school for different reasons. I have no idea how they are affording it tbh (debt, mostly it seems). I would have loved to do the same for my 2 but we just can't afford it. In days gone by, someone in my position would absolutely have been able to afford it.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Oct 12, 2023 8:58:51 GMT
I went private and my sister went state, and I think that was the best decision for both of us. Sometimes it depends on what the kid needs. I still don't really get how the UK government has managed to massively underfund *everything* from schools to prisons to hospitals, and claim to be the party of low taxation, while also apparently having the highest tax income ever. Muppets. According to this, as at 2021 funding per pupil for private schools was effectively double that for state schools, and the gap has widened a lot under the Tories. Under nu-Labour at least funding per pupil in state schools was rising. ifs.org.uk/articles/growing-gap-between-state-school-and-private-school-spending
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,657
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Oct 12, 2023 9:01:08 GMT
It may be a scholarship. We had a chance to send the girl to the local private school on one but we didnt on principle but then we are surrounded by ofsted good/outstanding schools so its easier to have principles. But then what use are principles if you only exercise them when it doesnt affect you?
I agree that the education system needs root and branch reform but even by youre own admission, you are participating in the continued widening of the social divide by providing your kids with an education most people cant afford. Which is fine, family first and all that but 'schools are shit so fuck everyone else' is also a stance that could have your leftie card revoked in some circles.
|
|
otto
New Member
Posts: 980
|
Post by otto on Oct 12, 2023 9:06:15 GMT
I still don't really get how the UK government has managed to massively underfund *everything* from schools to prisons to hospitals, and claim to be the party of low taxation, while also apparently having the highest tax income ever. Muppets. Look at where they're spending the money. 376 billion on Covid. 376 BILLION. Where did that go??
And then don't get me started on the money pit that is Brexit.
|
|
otto
New Member
Posts: 980
|
Post by otto on Oct 12, 2023 9:13:10 GMT
It may be a scholarship. We had a chance to send the girl to the local private school on one but we didnt on principle but then we are surrounded by ofsted good/outstanding schools so its easier to have principles. But then what use are principles if you only exercise them when it doesnt affect you? I agree that the education system needs root and branch reform but even by youre own admission, you are participating in the continued widening of the social divide by providing your kids with an education most people cant afford. Which is fine, family first and all that but 'schools are shit so fuck everyone else' is also a stance that could have your leftie card revoked in some circles. I get that. But I've thought hard about this and I'm not going to sacrifice my kids' future for fear that someone might revoke my leftie card. Like I'm not going to stop buying anything that contains plastic for fear that someone might blame me for the climate disaster. I'm aware of my individual contribution to these problems but I don't actually think it's reasonable to expect individuals to change systems unilaterally. Change has to happen at and from the top, and we can be more effective by calling for that change and voting for that change.
So if Labour promise to raise taxes massively, treble spending on schools, and phase out the private school system over time once the state sector can handle it, I'll vote for them; and as a Labour party member I'll also pressure them to commit to that.
|
|
dogbot
Full Member
Posts: 8,738
|
Post by dogbot on Oct 12, 2023 9:16:24 GMT
I still don't really get how the UK government has managed to massively underfund *everything* from schools to prisons to hospitals, and claim to be the party of low taxation, while also apparently having the highest tax income ever. Muppets. Look at where they're spending the money. 376 billion on Covid. 376 BILLION. Where did that go?? A good proportion of it went into Michelle Mone's pocket, I believe.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,657
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Oct 12, 2023 9:18:26 GMT
Yeah, its fine, like I say, i get it. Its just that its a problem because it affects you. For 93% of the country, its an absolute win.
Im guilty of it, too, because its the same logic as private medicine infecting the nation, propping up a deliberately underfunded NHS. I get it free with work so my three month wait is now three days. Bad service becomes not bad if you have money.
Would I be happy to lose that if it got the shit taxed out of it to fund the NHS? Yeah, probably, but it would suck.
|
|
|
Post by elstoof on Oct 12, 2023 9:24:21 GMT
I still don't really get how the UK government has managed to massively underfund *everything* from schools to prisons to hospitals, and claim to be the party of low taxation, while also apparently having the highest tax income ever. Muppets. Look at where they're spending the money. 376 billion on Covid. 376 BILLION. Where did that go??
And then don't get me started on the money pit that is Brexit.
WW2 was cheaper
|
|
otto
New Member
Posts: 980
|
Post by otto on Oct 12, 2023 9:25:34 GMT
Yeah, its fine, like I say, i get it. Its just that its a problem because it affects you. For 93% of the country, its an absolute win. Well it's not really an absolute win for 93% of the country, is it? Not if my kids along with tens of thousands of others are shoehorned into an already squeezed state sector, without funding to match. Just as you joining the three-month NHS waiting list isn't going to help the others on that waiting list.
The answer here is to increase investment in state services making private services redundant. Put them out of business by removing their market relevance, not by pricing them out of the reach of all but the super-rich.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,657
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Oct 12, 2023 9:29:30 GMT
Its not going to empty private schools overnight, come on.
|
|
dogbot
Full Member
Posts: 8,738
|
Post by dogbot on Oct 12, 2023 9:30:24 GMT
Fwiw, I don't remotely believe that parents shouldn't be able to make choices about their kids' education if they want to.
I just think that the schools which are run as businesses and are making a ton of money doing so should not have tax breaks and charitable statuses unless they are specifically providing services which should legitimately qualify them those statuses.
Businesses run for profit must pay appropriate taxes. As for Facebook, for Eton (or whomever).
If those businesses then choose to pass those profit-affecting costs onto their customers, then that is a situation between them.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Oct 12, 2023 9:35:04 GMT
Things like school uniforms, textbooks, etc.. are zero rated for VAT though, aren't they?
Not that I'm saying private school fees shouldn't be included in VAT.
|
|
otto
New Member
Posts: 980
|
Post by otto on Oct 12, 2023 9:36:49 GMT
OK look I'm talking more about general principles than the specific policy of keeping or removing tax breaks. I guess I probably support the removal of tax breaks, at least on principle. But I really hope it's properly costed, by which I mean they've done some careful analysis on how it will impact the state school population, because for sure it will push some parents out of private and into state schooling. So is it really anything more than a cosmetic nod to the base? Or is it a serious attempt to reform the education system?
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,657
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Oct 12, 2023 9:38:02 GMT
It can be both. Like I said the other day, in isolation, pointless. As part of a wider reform strategy? Not pointless.
|
|
|
Post by Dougs on Oct 12, 2023 9:42:53 GMT
I would say I'm surprised they haven't gone hard on education, as Blair did. But i guess a)Reminds people of Blair and b) everything else is fucked too so got to prioritise.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,657
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Oct 12, 2023 9:45:15 GMT
You dont want to invoke Blair. The first commie thing I ever did was protest the introduction of fees at a campus socialist workers rally. I had a friend with a donkey jacket and everything.
|
|
X201
Full Member
Posts: 5,141
|
Post by X201 on Oct 12, 2023 9:45:46 GMT
Look at where they're spending the money. 376 billion on Covid. 376 BILLION. Where did that go?? A good proportion of it went into Michelle Mone's pocket, I believe. Further to his previous statement, my client Mr dogbot would like to add "Allegedly"
|
|
|
Post by Dougs on Oct 12, 2023 9:51:41 GMT
You dont want to invoke Blair. The first commie thing I ever did was protest the introduction of fees at a campus socialist workers rally. I had a friend with a donkey jacket and everything. Up the workers! I wasn't really political at 6th form or uni. Kind of regret that tbh. I remember pretending to be to impress a girl in 6th form but didn't really know what i was talking about. Other than being appalled that Labour lost in 92 etc.
|
|
|
Post by stuz359 on Oct 12, 2023 9:51:51 GMT
I don't really have any skin in the game as it were, but I do have nephews/neices/other hangers on whose future I do care about.
But I would say, abolish private education. Then you would see a real clamour for reform in public education, they did it in Iceland and they're not doing badly.
I'm kind of interested as well in the models of academies tbh. I was talking to my brother yesterday and he was moaning about the cost of school uniforms. He has two kids at a particular secondary school and was commenting on the cost of a branded pair of trousers. They take a regular pair of trousers that cost about £5, apply a brand and charge £22. I haven't looked any of this up, but is that profiteering or is that going back into the school budget?
I listened to a podcast about how everything is framed through the lens of economics, so everything is subjected to a cost benefit analysis, through inputs leading to outputs, how do you even measure that in education? Testing scores mostly, but that doesn't take into account the mental well being of a student, just that you try to move that student on to improve test scores.
I know schools that hold regular fundraisers from parents to buy normal school supplies. Why is that normalised?
So yeah, abolish private education. It's only a meritocracy if everyone is starting from the same point.
|
|
|
Post by Dougs on Oct 12, 2023 9:53:32 GMT
The only bit of school uniform at my son's academy that can't be bought in Asda is the tie. They've even ditched the blazer.
|
|
|
Post by elstoof on Oct 12, 2023 9:59:08 GMT
Cost of uniform is nothing compared to a full wardrobe of clothes deemed cool enough to not get ridiculed by your peers.
school fundraising events aren’t anything new, I went to jumble salea and summer fairs in the 80s, but now they’re essential to the budget in my kids staunchly upper middle class located primary school
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,657
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Oct 12, 2023 10:00:48 GMT
School uniforms are an absolute racket. One of the reasons we chose the school we did was because of their relatively pragmatic uniform policy. The uniform isnt some hitler middle manager who insists on everyone looking like they are off to hogwarts.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,657
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Oct 12, 2023 10:03:39 GMT
Cost of uniform is nothing compared to a full wardrobe of clothes deemed cool enough to not get ridiculed by your peers. school fundraising events aren’t anything new, I went to jumble salea and summer fairs in the 80s, but now they’re essential to the budget in my kids staunchly upper middle class located primary school I really dont think thats true at all. Coats, watch, phone, bag are all big hitters regardless.
|
|
|
Post by elstoof on Oct 12, 2023 10:05:51 GMT
My secondary was uniform for the first 3 years, then regular clothes for the last 2. If you weren’t wearing the right sort of wash denim or a moschino shirt you were looked down on. No one ever gave a shit when you were all in the same uniform. Things might be different now though
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,657
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Oct 12, 2023 10:10:30 GMT
We didnt have a uniform for four years and black trousers and white polo in fifth year when we got a new head and the things people went hard on were largely stuff a uniform wouldnt cover. Nobody really gave that much of a shit what you wore because if its not a problem, its not a problem.
Kids are fuckers and a uniform isnt going to stop them othering *something*. They were wankers with uniform and without in our school.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Oct 12, 2023 10:16:49 GMT
I thought the UK had some kind of limit on how much a uniform can cost?
[edit:] seems like kinda, but the prices are a lot higher than I was expecting. I was sure there was a price cap of something like 25 quid, but seems not.
|
|
zephro
Junior Member
Posts: 3,010
|
Post by zephro on Oct 12, 2023 10:48:38 GMT
Yeah lack of uniform 6th form was way worse from my memory. Though teenagers are mostly arseholes either way. Hair cuts and shoes were the thing back in uniform.
I don't really get the special pleading stuff either; may just be personal experience. I was diagnosed as "developmentally slow" which was an early 90s improvement on "retarded", before they eventually settled on the dyspraxia/dyslexia thing. I guess it hadn't filtered down to where I lived at that point. Most the teachers had no idea what to do so I was regularly in detention, streamed down to lower classes and at one point they were going to put me in for intermediate GCSEs until my Mum kicked off at them. But I've got 3 degrees now so I'm not sure academically what private schooling would have done differently. Probably just the ability to shmooze and that weird sense of entitlement/over confidence they appear to have. Which I really think you ought not be able to buy.
|
|
otto
New Member
Posts: 980
|
Post by otto on Oct 12, 2023 10:54:50 GMT
Well with respect your experience may not be the experience of others. My eldest is not going to get any degree, let alone three degrees, and she was sinking fast in the perfectly lovely state school where she was left to flounder. I don't blame the school at all. No way could they have reasonably given her the attention she needed. But when she did finally get to a school where she was able to receive more tailored, focused, and individual attention, it literally saved her.
TLDR: what I bought her by putting her into an independent school was not 'a weird sense of entitlement' or 'overconfidence' but the ability to read and to be able to do basic maths.
|
|