Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2021 15:57:25 GMT
Momentum types give zero fucks about the country UNTIL the true messiah returns from his allotments and some student protest about the colonial aspects of breakfast cereals . Until then they will continue to cause infighting and letting the tories fuck the country into the ground.
The UK is even a bigger mess and nothing will stop the tories. the alt left types on reddit are loving (especially the english hating euro people, extra hand cream for them)
|
|
|
Post by grizzly on Sept 27, 2021 16:05:14 GMT
Calling Starmer clinical and forensic is pretty generous. He's just incredibly beige. About the only thing he has going for him is that he's not Corbyn. The in-fighting is pretty ridiculous though. I wish Momentum and the other further-left lot would split off. They aren't going to split off because who are they going to blame when they don't get anywhere. For them they'll constantly snipe and cause infighting all the while blaming other people with no self awareness that people rejected Corbyn. Arseholes, the lot of them. Dunno man, atleast when Corbyn was in charge the party had a message, it just couldn't sell the message becuase the tories "Get Brexit Done" was far stronger. That's still better then Keir "What's opposition?" Starmer. I haven't seen Labour make any moves ever since Keir was in charge despite, well, *gestures vaguely at everything*.
|
|
|
Post by Matt A on Sept 27, 2021 16:05:59 GMT
I got into a discussion with a hardcore left wing labour supporter on Twitter and he wouldn't have that Corbyn's loss was vindication for the idea that the result was rejection for hard left politics. He cited the increase in popularity in the membership of the Labour party as vindication for his politics. You would hope that a loss would provoke a rethink.
|
|
X201
Full Member
Posts: 5,115
|
Post by X201 on Sept 27, 2021 16:08:28 GMT
I really wouldn't want HGV drivers who deliver food or *explosive fuel* with all the care of a Hermes driver. lmao that would be actually a hilarious cause for the Fire of London v3.0 That actually takes place in Tewksbury due to Hermes' usual accuracy level.
|
|
|
Post by grizzly on Sept 27, 2021 16:11:38 GMT
Having looked at the Labour manifesto for the past few elections I am not entirely sure what's so hard-left about them. The issue with Labour's image seems to be more of Corbyn's image.
I'm totally onboard with the notion that Corbyn simply was never going to win an election, I am just not sure how Starmer just... vaguely hovering about is going to help the UK.
|
|
|
Post by Matt A on Sept 27, 2021 16:23:22 GMT
To my perception, and I might be wrong, but the more socialist policies were related to renationalising a lot of public services. I think at the point and situation that the country was in, ironically a Tory instigated massive unknown, it was to my mind a reckless idea to spend so heavily. That said, I think the loss in the election was as much to do with Brexit. I mean, quite deprived places like Stoke have voted Tory for the first time. I think leaving the EU got traction.
|
|
|
Post by grizzly on Sept 27, 2021 16:44:26 GMT
To my perception, and I might be wrong, but the more socialist policies were related to renationalising a lot of public services. I think at the point and situation that the country was in, ironically a Tory instigated massive unknown, it was to my mind a reckless idea to spend so heavily. That said, I think the loss in the election was as much to do with Brexit. I mean, quite deprived places like Stoke have voted Tory for the first time. I think leaving the EU got traction. But that's the thing, that's not very hard left: That's returning to a more left-wing status quo that the UK has gradually moved away from (and arguably reversing a trend where the UK has been slowly creeping towards the far right culminating with the tories just full on enforcing a UKIP agenda). It's a bit hair splitty, I know, but it's not even nearly as left as Clement Atlee's government (not that anyone could go there. You can't NHS the NHS). I disagree with the sentiment itself: Keynesian economics calls for increased spending in times of crisis to smooth out the economy (and then tightening spending when things go well). Arguably something like Brexit, which basically is a crisis, requires a decisive government that is willing upfront to make firm investments in order to ensure that the country weathers the storm. Ultimately, spending more now saves you from... ... well, this.
|
|
|
Post by Matt A on Sept 27, 2021 16:49:03 GMT
Really; fair enough. I'm not an economist and if that is the prudent course of action it blows what I was saying away but it still seems counter intuitive which I would guess is how the manifesto translated into public opinion.
|
|
|
Post by grizzly on Sept 27, 2021 16:52:00 GMT
Really; fair enough. I'm not an economist and if that is the prudent course of action it blows what I was saying away but it still seems counter intuitive which I would guess is how the manifesto translated into public opinion. The thing is that it is an effective propaganda line, but if you look at the UK's debt it seemed to have ballooned under tory rule. Labour's plans were ambitious, but they were also fully costed - they had fully planned out how they were going to pay for it all and included this in their manifesto. The Tories have introduced a decade of austerity which hasn't affected the deficit at all, and have literally never tried to justify how they were going to pay for their own expensive plans. The notion that more debt is more bad is a simplistic one (since governments don't function under the same rules as the rest of us do), but if you subscribe to that notion, then you're still in a situation where the tories are doing a far worse job.
|
|
|
Post by Matt A on Sept 27, 2021 16:56:16 GMT
Yeah if that is the case regarding the debt I guess you have a point. But it's not for nothing that effective communication strategies employed by most politicians at present has evolved to parroting mantras. Most people don't know as much as you.
|
|
|
Post by grizzly on Sept 27, 2021 17:02:53 GMT
Yes, and that's the big frustration I think: You can come up with the most elaborate and clever plan, but shouting that your opponents are riding a Maoist bicycle is easier
|
|
|
Post by Danno on Sept 27, 2021 17:13:08 GMT
A similar article was doing the rounds yesterday. But in this one some twenty something Tory was complaining that most of the girls his age on dating apps specified 'No Tories' and he felt he was being discriminated against. No grandma's perfumed labias is an unwritten rule, surely amounts to the same thing
|
|
|
Post by Matt A on Sept 27, 2021 17:15:14 GMT
It always strikes me as funny though that it serves politicians to talk about the opposition in terms of absolutes, so as you say, labour become communists. The reality between the two parties is a different fraction of the same idea. Like if you take tax; tax as a principle is to redistribute wealth to serve the many, at least it is in a modern democracy, and so is philosophically a left wing idea, and the reality of the application of tax between Labour and Conservative policy is as I said, a different fraction of the same idea. But it's always more sexy to paint the picture of Marxism.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,634
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Sept 27, 2021 17:17:32 GMT
Surely it’s better to find out now than when you get saddled with the bill after she escapes out of the toilet window because you casually mentioned that people shouldn’t have children they can’t afford over the starter?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2021 17:20:00 GMT
|
|
Tomo
Junior Member
Posts: 3,501
|
Post by Tomo on Sept 27, 2021 17:43:58 GMT
"To be an Etonian, on the other hand, is a condition you acquire ineradicably, in the innocence of childhood. It is an accident of birth (or a bit before, usually, which is when you’re put down on the General List). You no more choose to be Etonian than you choose to be black, or gay, or or a cervix-haver." Wwwwww-wow. Etonian Lives Matter guys.
|
|
|
Post by Danno on Sept 27, 2021 18:08:27 GMT
You got further than I could stomach. I really, really want to kick that guy in the bollocks
|
|
|
Post by elstoof on Sept 27, 2021 18:44:16 GMT
Can’t believe she said it during Etonian History Month
|
|
Dgzter
Junior Member
Posts: 2,147
|
Post by Dgzter on Sept 27, 2021 18:47:34 GMT
Even the most cursory glance at his Twitter profile reveals him to be an affected twat. He genuinely refers to his feed/timeline as 'the old TL'. Fuck me.
|
|
Rodderz
New Member
Is all that we see or seem, But a dream within a dream?
Posts: 974
|
Post by Rodderz on Sept 27, 2021 18:49:32 GMT
Matt Hancock has released a comeback video, linked above. He deleted it on the platforms he'd posted it on once everyone pointed out he came across a bit Partridge and utterly cringewrothy. Unfortunately for him, the internet rarely forgets, hence the video reappearing in other places like the above. Ugh, the cringe...
|
|
|
Post by Aunt Alison on Sept 27, 2021 18:54:05 GMT
The last clip is a perfect Alan/Michael at the petrol station moment
|
|
|
Post by elstoof on Sept 27, 2021 19:00:03 GMT
Just need to see him walking down the central reservation of a dual carriageway singing Goldfinger now
|
|
|
Post by simple on Sept 27, 2021 19:23:29 GMT
"To be an Etonian, on the other hand, is a condition you acquire ineradicably, in the innocence of childhood. It is an accident of birth (or a bit before, usually, which is when you’re put down on the General List). You no more choose to be Etonian than you choose to be black, or gay, or or a cervix-haver." Wwwwww-wow. Etonian Lives Matter guys. I don’t think the old Etonian I know thinks like that thankfully.
|
|
|
Post by simple on Sept 27, 2021 19:30:44 GMT
|
|
Dgzter
Junior Member
Posts: 2,147
|
Post by Dgzter on Sept 27, 2021 19:33:07 GMT
Absolute fucking state of it.
|
|
|
Post by Danno on Sept 27, 2021 19:33:17 GMT
It's how they've always worked, they simply can't countenance sharing power, but conveniently overlook the fact they're rarely in, and at present are never going be in, power.
|
|
Dgzter
Junior Member
Posts: 2,147
|
Post by Dgzter on Sept 27, 2021 19:36:50 GMT
They are not getting within a sniff of power for at least the next decade, I suspect.
|
|
|
Post by TheSaint on Sept 27, 2021 20:44:27 GMT
I mean this is just wrong on so many levels. What a simpleton.
|
|
Dgzter
Junior Member
Posts: 2,147
|
Post by Dgzter on Sept 27, 2021 20:55:00 GMT
I mean this is just wrong on so many levels. What a simpleton. Yup. It's genuinely tragic. And how does she square the fact that the lack of pluralism in our political system has already allowed the 'far right' into parliament? Germany will shortly be another coalition government, where the centre has held. The SNP have entered into a coalition with the Scottish Greens even though they would have been able to govern fairly comfortably as a minority government. Labour's unwillingness to work with the other liberal and left of centre parties is genuinely depressing. It very much feels that the Tories literally cannot lose for the foreseeable future.
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Sept 27, 2021 21:07:05 GMT
I mean this is just wrong on so many levels. What a simpleton. It's almost as if they pretend they want to be in power.
|
|