apollo
Junior Member
Posts: 1,720
|
Post by apollo on Sept 25, 2024 17:50:11 GMT
Its not just the tory backing media, you have the tankie/armchair communist types (or whatever you want to call these chuds) who constantly looking looking to put the boot in. Since their dear leader got ousted they have been banging on (more like dribbling on) about "red tories". These recent fuck up from labour (as mentioned are not on the same amount of sleaze as tories did, not even close) have been like a birthday present to these snide cunts. They hate Labour as much as the daily heil or torygraph
|
|
|
Post by Reviewer on Sept 25, 2024 18:07:56 GMT
It’s obviously not as bad as the tories and their handouts of billions but it’s also only about two months into being in charge and not exactly a sign of change from what was before.
So far all we’ve heard is about expenses/handouts and austerity. So far, so Tory.
|
|
|
Post by brokenkey on Sept 25, 2024 20:25:45 GMT
Not fat shaming, but has anyone else noticed how podgy Starmer has become around the face?
|
|
Aunty Treats
Junior Member
Delivering tasty treats to the townsfolk
Posts: 1,043
|
Post by Aunty Treats on Sept 25, 2024 20:42:37 GMT
It's all the Uber Eats donations, the cheeky fucker
|
|
Blue_Mike
Full Member
Meet Hanako At Embers
Posts: 5,381
|
Post by Blue_Mike on Sept 25, 2024 21:39:05 GMT
Anyone remember Keith Vaz, now there was a dodgy cunt
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Sept 26, 2024 1:42:38 GMT
It's weird that Labour got so careless about stuff the Tory press would attack them with after the election, as they were so (overly) careful about it before the election.
I do feel a bit for them though, they're stuck between the Tory press on one side, and the Unions and Left-wing press on the other side. You could tell that half their conference speeches were hemmed in and basically trying to walk a really fine line.
Not that I don't sometimes agree with them, but you'd think some of the unions and other left-wing MPs/members would realise that it's in their own best interests to just shut the fuck up for a while and let the government get on with stuff, rather than weakening them by criticising and undermining them at every turn.
The nurses union announcing they were rejecting the pay offer *at the very moment* Reeves was giving her speech, for example. Or union leaders going on about the winter fuel payments issue, which is not a union issue.
Maybe it's my biases showing, but the left-wing press (Basically the Guardian) has always been more self-critical than the right-wing press (Basically every other paper), and that's a good thing because it means they're actually doing their job. But it does leave Labour governments with a lot less cheerleaders than Tory governments.
In that environment, maybe the unions and far-left could try actually supporting the new government for a while, because once the new government is in a stronger position it might be able to do some of the stuff they want. Or at the very least they could keep quiet for 6 months.
|
|
|
Post by Vandelay on Sept 26, 2024 6:42:24 GMT
Although I don't entirely disagree with you Bill, I would caveat it by saying that it isn't the job of the Unions to fully support a Labour government no matter what. They should be representing what is best for their members.
I don't see how reducing the number of people that are eligible for Winter Fuel Allowance falls under that remit, so I can't see why they would go after them so full throated on that issue (besides the obvious "they aren't a real Labour government"). It isn't even one that the right-wing press can really complain that much about, as Tories were looking to do it too, so Unions and the left are the ones mostly keeping it in the news cycle.
Instead, if they were out talking about the workers' rights bill that is being worked on at the moment and highlighting the areas that falls short, then I wouldn't see an issue with that.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Sept 26, 2024 7:26:57 GMT
Although I don't entirely disagree with you Bill, I would caveat it by saying that it isn't the job of the Unions to fully support a Labour government no matter what. True, but when the new government has come in and basically agreed to almost every pay demand, even knowing it was going to get them a kicking in a lot of the press, you'd think they'd at least keep their criticisms to themselves for a bit. Especially when it's about matters that don't concern them, and the argument could be made that one reason the government needs to cut the winter fuel thing is so it can raise public sector pay. I'm not unsympathetic to the nurses wanting more than 25% after years of real-world cuts, but I'm pretty sure it's a lot better than they'd have gotten under the previous government, and if they still weren't happy with it then it seems like something that should have been discussed in private, or at least not released during Reeves' speech. Because if they undermine this government too much then they're going to be worse off in the long run. We all are. They finally have a government that seems sympathetic and willing to listen to them, so they could try being a bit constructive.* *I realise that being constructive isn't seen as a thing Unions should do in the UK, but it would be nice if it was.
|
|
Wizzard_Ook
Junior Member
Posts: 1,219
Member is Online
|
Post by Wizzard_Ook on Sept 26, 2024 8:04:08 GMT
It's weird that Labour got so careless about stuff the Tory press would attack them with after the election, as they were so (overly) careful about it before the election. I do feel a bit for them though, they're stuck between the Tory press on one side, and the Unions and Left-wing press on the other side. You could tell that half their conference speeches were hemmed in and basically trying to walk a really fine line. Not that I don't sometimes agree with them, but you'd think some of the unions and other left-wing MPs/members would realise that it's in their own best interests to just shut the fuck up for a while and let the government get on with stuff, rather than weakening them by criticising and undermining them at every turn. The nurses union announcing they were rejecting the pay offer *at the very moment* Reeves was giving her speech, for example. Or union leaders going on about the winter fuel payments issue, which is not a union issue. Maybe it's my biases showing, but the left-wing press (Basically the Guardian) has always been more self-critical than the right-wing press (Basically every other paper), and that's a good thing because it means they're actually doing their job. But it does leave Labour governments with a lot less cheerleaders than Tory governments. In that environment, maybe the unions and far-left could try actually supporting the new government for a while, because once the new government is in a stronger position it might be able to do some of the stuff they want. Or at the very least they could keep quiet for 6 months. Sadly it not going to happen. Owen Jones will need to descend the final fantasy 7 staircase to get off his high horse to offer any sort of constructive criticism or acknowledgment of support. But yeah I agree with your post overall. In two minds as well, you need the press to hold any government to account but it often feels like news is turning into gotcha politics. The BBC have been extremely guilty of this. They’re not really interested in the actual story but more interested in that moment when politicians are squirming. And that goes for the wider press as well. With the donations stories I havn’t seen anything looking into whom Lord Alli actually is, whether he has received favours or what his role is, but instead focusing on the numbers of the donations. There is nothing sincere about it at all which results in leaps that don’t land, but they do with the public and often get repeated, like the hospitality box at Arsenal - Kier has been a season ticket holder for years and it makes sense to move a prime minister into a more secure area. It’s nonsense - but that’s not saying other stories are. I’m still deciding whether this sort of reporting is damaging to our politics, like we have to drag everybody down to the dregs and it allows people like Farage to actually flourish. It’s a real fine line though and we need journalism for a healthy democracy, but when our media are brought, our media isn’t exactly healthy. I feel it is often right wing/right parties actively try to make people disenfranchised with politics so they can push through all manner of shit because people simply don’t care and it feels like places like the BBC are active and sadly knowing participants in that. But as you say it is probably our own biases talking.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Sept 26, 2024 8:23:47 GMT
Agreed.
Ignoring Owen Jones, I don't mind the Guardian and the BBC holding the government to account. That is needed. It's a shame the right wing press don't seem to do it (but maybe that's my biases).
As you say, the BBC in particular seems to have devolved into the same gotcha politics as the right wing press. A symptom of the modern news cycle I guess. If Lord Alli is actually getting some dodgy contracts or something as a result of donations then by all means investigate, but the other stuff is mostly tabloid-level junk.
But if the right wing press is gonna gotcha them, and the BBC is gonna gotcha them, and then Guardian is going to hold them to account, then maybe the Unions and Labour MPs/Members shouldn't join in the pile on.
|
|
|
Post by manfromdelmonte on Sept 26, 2024 8:32:13 GMT
Ultimately a lot of swing voters are pretty apolitical. Media coverage doesn't cut through as much as how well off they feel. Look how many scandals there were before the mood really turned on Alexander Boris DePfeffel Johnson.
I suspect that the winter fuel payment policy is more performative. Credit rating agencies like when a population will accept austerity. If this country can regain some of the credibility that Brexit, Alexander Boris DePfeffel Johnson and Truss have pissed away, there a big savings to be had on debt interest.
Or maybe that's a bit 4d chess and they're just dopes in suits.... Free suits.
|
|
|
Post by technoish on Sept 26, 2024 8:54:29 GMT
I cannot read Owen Jones... But most of the guardian stuff is better than anything else. FT also has some pretty good reporting, bar the odd weird commentator.
|
|
|
Post by Chopsen on Sept 26, 2024 8:58:55 GMT
Janan Ganesh by any chance? I've never read anything by him that isn't so stupid it makes me annoyed he exists.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,636
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Sept 26, 2024 9:21:10 GMT
The Guardian is fine/good for actual news but they don't half platform some doss cunts. I know most papers mainly just run on idioctic opinion pieces now but they publish some proper shit from idiots like Sonia Sodha and have platformed the likes of Suzanne Moore, Nick Cohen and Hadley Freeman in the past. Marina Hyde is useless six music dad bait, too.
|
|
|
Post by Chopsen on Sept 26, 2024 9:38:34 GMT
Ha, yes Hyde I find annoying in a way I find it hard to articulate. That sums it up pretty well. Though that's the second time I've seen you say "6 music dad" as a derogatory thing in so many days. Did Steve Lamacq take the piss out of your record collection when you were younger?
I can only believe that the Comment is Free desk just sit around each day baiting each other to write the most stupid thing possible to see if they can get away with it and still be taken seriously be someone. At least the Daily Star knows it's having a laugh.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,636
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Sept 26, 2024 9:43:33 GMT
It’s an annoyingly apt epithet and one I’m really struggling with as it applies to my entire circle of friends. If you think this place is an echo chamber, you should see my WhatsApp group chats.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,636
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Sept 26, 2024 9:44:51 GMT
Yes, I am aware I’m probably one myself
|
|
|
Post by technoish on Sept 26, 2024 10:13:36 GMT
If you want high brow clickbait, check out the Washington Post. Their columns run a huge gamut of weird and wonderful. You never know what you are going to get.
|
|
hedben
Junior Member
Formerly: hedben2013
Posts: 2,203
|
Post by hedben on Sept 26, 2024 10:35:09 GMT
I was trying to put into words how Labour’s scandal has echoes of the expenses scandal but Marie le Conte did it better than I could
Basically yes, they should be squeaky clean after spending years in opposition as the party of trust and anti-corruption, but I can also see how you could easily think of this behaviour as fairly normal and well established if you’ve been in politics for a while. Maybe they should embrace it as an opportunity to clean up, so the other lot will be held to the same high standard when (if?) they return to office in future.
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Sept 26, 2024 10:44:11 GMT
The Guardian is fine/good for actual news but they don't half platform some doss cunts. I know most papers mainly just run on idioctic opinion pieces now but they publish some proper shit from idiots like Sonia Sodha and have platformed the likes of Suzanne Moore, Nick Cohen and Hadley Freeman in the past. Marina Hyde is useless six music dad bait, too. The fact that Jones still has a platform to continue his totally not an ex lover scorned role play is what I find the most infuriating .
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,636
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Sept 26, 2024 10:56:18 GMT
I actually don’t mind Owen Jones. He’s like 70% good takes to 30% hysterical whining and he is one of the few leftists who can make a good account of themselves on TV.
He never falls for the old right wing trick of a Tory/Tory Mouthpiece saying ‘and I’m sure Owen will agree that [bad thing dressed up to sound reasonable]…’.
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Sept 26, 2024 11:18:25 GMT
"I think Elon Musk has been a fantastic thing for freedom of speech. I will hold my hand up and say, I’m a huge fan of Elon Musk.
I look at Twitter before he took over and after: there is a lot more free speech. Yes, there are many, many more things that I see on X, as he calls it, that I don’t like.
But I also know that views are not suppressed the way that they were, that there was a cultural establishment – that was very left – that controlled quite a lot of discourse on that platform."
Kemi Badenoch here, really trying. God it's so pathetic.
|
|
sport✅
Junior Member
notice me senpai
I want to claim my tits
Posts: 2,318
|
Post by sport✅ on Sept 26, 2024 11:24:26 GMT
Wow
|
|
myk
New Member
Posts: 771
|
Post by myk on Sept 26, 2024 11:43:03 GMT
I was trying to put into words how Labour’s scandal has echoes of the expenses scandal but Marie le Conte did it better than I could Basically yes, they should be squeaky clean after spending years in opposition as the party of trust and anti-corruption, but I can also see how you could easily think of this behaviour as fairly normal and well established if you’ve been in politics for a while. Maybe they should embrace it as an opportunity to clean up, so the other lot will be held to the same high standard when (if?) they return to office in future. nah, I think they'll just see the story out, eventually the media will get bored. Tories won't attack them much because they sure as hell don't want the gravy train to end. Labour have to take the hits coming their way these first couple of months, playing to the media's tune won't get them anywhere.
|
|
|
Post by Chopsen on Sept 26, 2024 12:17:28 GMT
Eh I don't know. For better or worse Labour (and progressive politicians generally) are held to a higher standard by people than, say, Boris Johnson or Trump. Those guys have have chicanery priced in to their support. People know they're bent before they even pledge to support them. Hence it takes a lot to shift the dial there, but a lot less for others suck as Starmer.
Also, as has been pointed out here and elsewhere even by proper political journos, corporate culture generally has moved on donations and gifts in industry are no longer considered appropriate. As always, the culture of the HoC is behind the curve compared to the rest of society.
|
|
|
Post by Whizzo on Sept 26, 2024 12:22:00 GMT
Probably the first thing that Labour MPs need to get to grips with is if something is within the rules but appears to be wrong to the general public maybe the rules are just too broad and need adjusting.
The whole MPs expenses scandal should have been adequate warning.
|
|
rftp
New Member
Posts: 719
Member is Online
|
Post by rftp on Sept 26, 2024 12:24:21 GMT
Perhaps it's about time they remembered who the fuck they work for and were held to higher standards.
|
|
cubby
Full Member
doesn't get subtext
Posts: 6,375
|
Post by cubby on Sept 26, 2024 12:25:09 GMT
"I think Elon Musk has been a fantastic thing for freedom of speech. I will hold my hand up and say, I’m a huge fan of Elon Musk. I look at Twitter before he took over and after: there is a lot more free speech. Yes, there are many, many more things that I see on X, as he calls it, that I don’t like. But I also know that views are not suppressed the way that they were, that there was a cultural establishment – that was very left – that controlled quite a lot of discourse on that platform." Kemi Badenoch here, really trying. God it's so pathetic. Also how exactly did she conduct this forensic examination of before and after?
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,636
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Sept 26, 2024 12:25:14 GMT
The problem they are having (and one they should have anticipated) is that it’s not just the Tory press holding them to a higher standard, after 14 years of the conservatives debasing office *everyone* expects better of them because to restore any faith in politics they have to be.
Is that unfair? Possibly, but it’s about time the system was given an enema and this is as good a time as any.
|
|
|
Post by Chopsen on Sept 26, 2024 12:26:30 GMT
I think it's a problem with the political class generally.
There seems to be a mindset that as long as you declare it, it's fine. I think that's why the messaging has been so off. "We've done nothing wrong" is their view on it, because it's declared.
The register is not there as a get out free jail card, or a confessional to absolve your sins. It's to allow scrutiny. Which is what is happening. And people don't approve, and they don't have a good response. The lack of a good response is what is allowing the story to keep on trucking. The story about his son staying at a mate's flat to do some studying for his GCSE's is a non-story. But because they've floundered on the issue, it's an easy one for those who are looking for a gotchya.
|
|