|
Post by Bill in the rain on Sept 17, 2024 15:04:33 GMT
Why is everyone going on about such a minor non-issue like the clothes thing?
I went on a bbc news story about something totally different yesterday and there were just about 500 comments going "But the clothes!!!!" Are there not any actually important political issues for people to discuss? (not on bbc news comments, obviously, but outside of that)
|
|
|
Post by Vandelay on Sept 17, 2024 15:10:17 GMT
Lots of positives, such as much more work being down on green energy, successfully getting deals with unions to end strikes, plans in place for improvements to public transport, conversations with other nations that are getting the UK back on the global stage, etc, etc.
They could even be focusing on the Lib Dem conference, with Ed Davey giving his conference speech this afternoon.
None of that is going to get the same level as engagement about yelling about gifts and donations that don't break any rules though.
Should add, it isn't helped by stupid Arsenal comments from Starmer though. The communication around it has been abysmal and has helped drag it out far longer than it deserves.
|
|
|
Post by technoish on Sept 17, 2024 16:59:51 GMT
It's not like that's a new reason, he's said that's why he has high gifts as he goes to a lot of football, and the security reasons. Feels pretty reasonable to me.
|
|
|
Post by Reviewer on Sept 17, 2024 18:39:52 GMT
He should know better. If he wants to claim he’s better morally than the tories and that all politicians aren’t just in it for themselves then he should’ve turned down the freebies that the general public would never get.
On its own is it a big thing? No. But it is stupid and unethical.
|
|
|
Post by GigaChad Sigma. on Sept 17, 2024 21:53:14 GMT
Dianne Abbott teabagging Starmer on TV. At least she may have scuttled the phrase 22 Billion black hole, That PR think tank phrase was more annoying than Daddy toolmaker.
I guess they won't be sending each other Christmas cards.
|
|
robthehermit
Junior Member
Subjectively amusing
Posts: 2,464
|
Post by robthehermit on Sept 18, 2024 9:52:35 GMT
What?
|
|
|
Post by Whizzo on Sept 18, 2024 9:57:19 GMT
No that makes you a worker not working class, she's Liz Truss Mk2.
|
|
rftp
New Member
Posts: 720
|
Post by rftp on Sept 18, 2024 10:03:09 GMT
She seems to have a little more life behind her eyes than the Truss, but she apparently doesn't have much more between the ears.
|
|
|
Post by technoish on Sept 18, 2024 13:20:25 GMT
Oh my days, how does she manage that.
Although I think nobody really knows what working class is any more. Working/middle class are not very useful designations any more.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,638
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Sept 18, 2024 13:22:40 GMT
I think she could well turn out to be dumber than Truss. Maybe not more unhinged, but legitimately thick as pig shit in a really new and special way.
|
|
|
Post by Duffking on Sept 18, 2024 14:33:08 GMT
In a weird way, I feel like Badenoch is where she is in the party pretty much entirely because of racism.
|
|
zephro
Junior Member
Posts: 3,010
|
Post by zephro on Sept 18, 2024 14:35:44 GMT
Oh my days, how does she manage that. Although I think nobody really knows what working class is any more. Working/middle class are not very useful designations any more. They're perfectly useful as long as you don't confuse them with Marxist class analysis and struggle. Which is basically what everyone does these days.
|
|
|
Post by Duffking on Sept 19, 2024 8:38:26 GMT
Amused by the BBC article on the front page. "Nobody cared about the story we broke over the weekend so now we're telling you why you should care, but can't so we're going to talk about how hard we worked on it, boo hoo"
|
|
|
Post by Whizzo on Sept 19, 2024 8:39:59 GMT
Chris Mason is as bad as Laura K., they both need to be moved on.
|
|
|
Post by Vandelay on Sept 19, 2024 8:46:20 GMT
Feels like media are desperate to find divisions within government. The Guardian the other day were trying to make a big deal out of a residency of Dorneywood mansion being given to Reeves. But Blair gave it to his deputy! Of course, tucked in the article is that other PMs have given it to other positions and that it traditionally goes to foreign secretary, but Rayner is going to be so pissed off!!
Whether these stories of division are true or not, I guess it must be hard for journalists to do anything else. They've had 14 years of a soap opera and there will be many that have had their whole careers being just reporting on childish bickering.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Sept 19, 2024 8:47:19 GMT
Amused by the BBC article on the front page. "Nobody cared about the story we broke over the weekend so now we're telling you why you should care, but can't so we're going to talk about how hard we worked on it, boo hoo" I assume this is the Sue Gray pay article, to save anyone else wasting time searching for an article, only to end up going "I don't care about this"
|
|
|
Post by Whizzo on Sept 19, 2024 8:53:25 GMT
Yes it's Chris Mason trying to drum up interest in a story no-one really gives a shit about, should the Prime Minister get less than a civil servant? *Shrug*
For anyone wondering Chris Mason is also paid a lot more than the Prime Minister, in the region of £230K.
|
|
Vortex
Full Member
Harvey Weinstein's Tattered Penis
is apparently a mangina.
Posts: 5,406
|
Post by Vortex on Sept 19, 2024 8:54:34 GMT
@ bill
It was, I did look, and I don't really care. Other roles have also had higher pay than the PM before haven't they?
|
|
cubby
Full Member
doesn't get subtext
Posts: 6,378
Member is Online
|
Post by cubby on Sept 19, 2024 9:41:27 GMT
Yes it's Chris Mason trying to drum up interest in a story no-one really gives a shit about, should the Prime Minister get less than a civil servant? *Shrug* For anyone wondering Chris Mason is also paid a lot more than the Prime Minister, in the region of £230K. The most interesting part of that story is how Whizzo found out how much he's paid.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Sept 19, 2024 9:45:15 GMT
Yes it's Chris Mason trying to drum up interest in a story no-one really gives a shit about, should the Prime Minister get less than a civil servant? *Shrug* For anyone wondering Chris Mason is also paid a lot more than the Prime Minister, in the region of £230K. The most interesting part of that story is how Whizzo found out how much he's paid. Not if you read the story. though there doesn't actually seem to be much story to the story, so maybe the most interesting thing about the story is that Chris Mason is paid 230k
|
|
|
Post by Chopsen on Sept 19, 2024 9:50:43 GMT
From what I gathered for Jack and Sam's podcast, there seemed to be quite aggressive briefing to the media about Sue Gray and some people within the government/No 10 office *really* want to stick the boot in. The suggestion it's quite a disjointed operation, and ministers are left out on a limb without a clear party line to stick to when the get challenged on things like this or the expenses and gifts story.
Not that long ago I remember many people cheering on how great it was to have grown ups in charge. Didn't last long.
|
|
zephro
Junior Member
Posts: 3,010
|
Post by zephro on Sept 19, 2024 10:02:37 GMT
Yes it's Chris Mason trying to drum up interest in a story no-one really gives a shit about, should the Prime Minister get less than a civil servant? *Shrug* For anyone wondering Chris Mason is also paid a lot more than the Prime Minister, in the region of £230K. The most interesting part of that story is how Whizzo found out how much he's paid. www.bbc.com/aboutthebbc/whoweare/staff for non celeb staff, was always handy if one of the well paid bosses was giving us bad news about no salary increases this year. Celeb version. BBC News - BBC pay 2023-2024: The full list of star salaries www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0w4xqlwr1roHe's actually on 260. The Tories introduced a law that they have to publicly disclose all salaries over some figure around 170k. Possibly because they're paid more than the PM. Sounds like the kinda vindictive thing Boris would do.
|
|
|
Post by Vandelay on Sept 19, 2024 10:09:08 GMT
I guess the question is where is this coming from. There is a strong suggestion that many of these stories are coming from Simon Case, Head of Civil Service. Case is a figure who really came to prominence during Johnson's tenure and was also at the centre of pretty much every scandal. He also made a lot of noise about the Gray appointment by Labour and her departure was also supposedly proceeded by him making sure she didn't get a promotion (if I remember rightly, Badenoch was looking to recruit her into her team).
Case is leaving at some point in the coming months, so I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of these stories disappear when he has gone.
Regardless though, the communication around them has definitely been abysmal. We all knew the press would be out to dig out any tiny bit of dirt or discontent, so they really should have been much more prepared to handle these kinds of stories.
|
|
mcmonkeyplc
Junior Member
General Martok Qapla!
Posts: 3,089
|
Post by mcmonkeyplc on Sept 19, 2024 10:09:50 GMT
The most interesting part of that story is how Whizzo found out how much he's paid. www.bbc.com/aboutthebbc/whoweare/staff for non celeb staff, was always handy if one of the well paid bosses was giving us bad news about no salary increases this year. Celeb version. BBC News - BBC pay 2023-2024: The full list of star salaries www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0w4xqlwr1roHe's actually on 260. The Tories introduced a law that they have to publicly disclose all salaries over some figure around 170k. Possibly because they're paid more than the PM. Sounds like the kinda vindictive thing Boris would do. I think that's more of a story than Sue Gray getting paid 3k more than the PM.
|
|
|
Post by Whizzo on Sept 19, 2024 10:16:08 GMT
I saw last year's figures, didn't realise he'd had a 30K rise, must be nice to have an increase like that.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Sept 19, 2024 10:16:17 GMT
I like that you guys are all positive about the grownups being in charge and ministers not being reshuffled all the time, but I seem to remember a bunch of that stuff going on under Blair/Brown, and more worryingly, people like Jack Straw often playing up their right-wing tendencies to appeal to Daily Mail readers. Not saying we shouldn't all be happy and hope things will improve, but I do think it's a bit naive to think they're going to have significantly less internal squabbles and factions than the other lot. Hopefully I'm wrong. Didn't take long... I hate being right all the time.
|
|
|
Post by Dougs on Sept 19, 2024 10:18:02 GMT
From what I gathered for Jack and Sam's podcast, there seemed to be quite aggressive briefing to the media about Sue Gray and some people within the government/No 10 office *really* want to stick the boot in. The suggestion it's quite a disjointed operation, and ministers are left out on a limb without a clear party line to stick to when the get challenged on things like this or the expenses and gifts story. Not that long ago I remember many people cheering on how great it was to have grown ups in charge. Didn't last long. Number 10 is always like that. Too many people trying to climb the ladder etc.
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Sept 19, 2024 10:22:29 GMT
Tbf Labour being bad at comms has always been a feature rather than a bug.
|
|
|
Post by Dougs on Sept 19, 2024 10:25:04 GMT
That too.
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Sept 19, 2024 10:49:02 GMT
Seriously why are they so scared of just saying something before it becomes an issue? Just clear it up, the the rest is noise because now I'm seeing articles where Sue Gray is being labelled as "arrogant" for accepting a role that pays her more than the PM. It's just nonsense and the average person sees it at face value because Labour are scared of their own shadow.
|
|