lexw
New Member
Posts: 858
|
Post by lexw on Nov 28, 2021 17:24:23 GMT
I stand by both posts. You both don't say very much of substance, and are overly argumentative and confrontational in the way you do it. That last post demonstrates both pretty well. But hey, you do you. The internet is a wide and varied place with all kinds of people to be found. Not really seeing how you can stand by the first claim, but that's a catch-22 you decided to create, so I guess I can only shrug.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,658
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Nov 28, 2021 17:36:45 GMT
If I’ve skim read this correctly, chopsen is right in that in a FPTP world the party needs to be a broad church and the kind of 2018 ‘fuck off and join the tories’ purges help no one.
FPTP gives license for cretins like Matthew Parry to confidently declare Britain doesn’t like immigrants. The tories have the largest vote share because there is no purity test for being a shithead but the actual ‘progressive’ vote share in this country is collectively larger than the Tory vote. It’s just split between varying ideologies where as anyone who is even vaguely mean spirited can find a home with the tories.
Sadly, pragmatism is the only way to win an election and then you can get in with fixing things.
|
|
lexw
New Member
Posts: 858
|
Post by lexw on Nov 28, 2021 17:57:47 GMT
If I’ve skim read this correctly, chopsen is right in that in a FPTP world the party needs to be a broad church and the kind of 2018 ‘fuck off and join the tories’ purges help no one. FPTP gives license for cretins like Matthew Parry to confidently declare Britain doesn’t like immigrants. The tories have the largest vote share because there is no purity test for being a shithead but the actual ‘progressive’ vote share in this country is collectively larger than the Tory vote. It’s just split between varying ideologies where as anyone who is even vaguely mean spirited can find a home with the tories. Sadly, pragmatism is the only way to win an election and then you can get in with fixing things. The "purge" in question was the Tories doing a "Fuck off out of our party if you're not pro-Brexit" one. I'm not sure I've ever seen a party "get on with fixing things" during my lifetime. I guess the closest would be New Labour before they got utterly fixated on "being party of law and order" and decided that they need to kick that up a notch to being the party of the total surveillance state (to the point where people working for the council could literally order wiretaps, back before RIP got reformed, and that wasn't a mistake, that was Working As Intended), ASBOs, mandatory biometric identity cards, and so on. We didn't actually disagree re: "broad church", just whether the Tories were ideological or not. I'd say the current lot are, and that they succeeded because that wasn't actually evident to the public during the 2019 election, and Corbyn looked like a real nutcase. I think we're kind of getting into UK politics rather than Woke though at this point.
|
|
|
Post by Danno on Nov 28, 2021 18:17:10 GMT
I think we're kind of getting into UK politics rather than Woke though at this point. It's all going on in there. I've already bagsied the crackling cock so don't ask.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,658
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Nov 28, 2021 18:24:40 GMT
The "purge" in question was the Tories doing a "Fuck off out of our party if you're not pro-Brexit" one.[ They purged the MPs. They didn’t need to do anything about the voter base because the vote base were almost entirely pro-Brexit. You are conflating two completely different things. And, just to let you know, the Labour Party can be criticised on its own merits without whatabouting the tories.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,658
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Nov 28, 2021 18:26:25 GMT
Having said all that, it did jog my memory about Chukka and his short lived part so, yeah, there’s that
|
|
lexw
New Member
Posts: 858
|
Post by lexw on Nov 28, 2021 18:28:56 GMT
The "purge" in question was the Tories doing a "Fuck off out of our party if you're not pro-Brexit" one.[ They purged the MPs. They didn’t need to do anything about the voter base because the vote base were almost entirely pro-Brexit. You are conflating two completely different things. And, just to let you know, the Labour Party can be criticised on its own merits without whatabouting the tories. I am? I didn't even bring up the purge. Chopsen did (IIRC). So I'm not really sure how I'm conflating anything. I was just pointing out to you that that was the "purge" being referred to in the posts you skimmed. Equally confused re: "whatabouting" accusation. I've literally never seen any party, in my lifetime, "get on with fixing things". Not Tories, not New Labour, not Tory/LD combo, and definitely not recent Tories. I'm just scarred for life by the whole "Wait, let's turn law & order up to 11!" thing New Labour did. It was creepy AF. Also if I'm "whatabouting the Tories" does that mean I'm saying bad things the Tories did or bad things Labour did? Not a rhetorical question lol I genuinely don't know.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,658
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Nov 28, 2021 18:31:20 GMT
Ok 👍
|
|
|
Post by Chopsen on Nov 28, 2021 18:39:02 GMT
Generally, if a party was so ideologically driven you wouldn't expect them to do so many u-turns the minute it looks like their stance might damage their popularity. Hell, they've reverse ferreted out of positions while there was someone on air sent out to defend their position still being interviewed.
|
|
|
Post by Sarfrin on Nov 28, 2021 19:10:05 GMT
I think we're kind of getting into UK politics rather than Woke though at this point. It's all going on in there. I've already bagsied the crackling cock so don't ask. I'm really quite proud of sending that thread in the direction of cannibalising Johnson's Johnson.
|
|
lexw
New Member
Posts: 858
|
Post by lexw on Nov 28, 2021 19:16:45 GMT
Generally, if a party was so ideologically driven you wouldn't expect them to do so many u-turns the minute it looks like their stance might damage their popularity. Hell, they've reverse ferreted out of positions while there was someone on air sent out to defend their position still being interviewed. I mean, wouldn't you? I guess that's a question. So from my perspective here's what I see: 1) Tories come up with really extreme and demented laws to be voted on, laws which are largely ideological, and where basic considerations of practicality or reasonableness or fairness have not been considered. 2) Said suggested laws prove unpopular with the public, and more importantly, the remaining non-nutcase Tories (which is like 30-40% of the MPs), who are required to pass them. 3) Tory High Command insists they will go ahead anyway, makes very aggressive public statements. 4) Rebellion brews among non-insane Tories. 5) BoJo finds out and starts panicking. Grant Shapps or [insert any brown or black Tory] is shock-prodded on to TV tell us how great the ideas are, and how they're definitely not going to do a U-turn again this time. 6) BoJo and chums do the math and find they are either definitely going to lose, or will have a pathetic, embarrassing victory even the BBC can't spin as awesome and then likely actually lose the next time they have to vote on it. 7) U-turn because they're fucked if they don't. Part of the current Tory ideology is "retain power at ALL COSTS", that means U-turning sometimes, that means gerrymandering other times, that means voter suppression, that means obvious vote-buying attempts other times, but none of that is going to mean jack if they can't get enough stuff in place that they are immune to losing elections in future, and there's going to be at least one election before it's all in place. So "retain power at ALL COSTS" kicks in and causes U-turns. If the government had done zero U-turns we'd have been a vote of no confidence in Boris and/or a general election by now. I guess another way to put it is that being a bunch of cowardly, stupid and incompetent ideologues doesn't make you not ideologues. A third way is that the Tories are a weird amalgam party right now, with a bunch of trad conservatives (out of favour), a bunch of chancers with little ideology beyond "grab what you can" (including BoJo), and a significant subset of hard-right nutcases, many of them cabinet members, who are certainly ideologues, but many of whom are so outright stupid that it's hard for them to present any kind of consistent ideology (Dorries springs to mind - the woman is genuinely thick as pigshit but has really extreme views - Patel is a bit smarter but not intelligent or sane and likewise has extreme views).
|
|
cubby
Full Member
doesn't get subtext
Posts: 6,397
|
Post by cubby on Nov 28, 2021 19:43:42 GMT
Kiss!
|
|
|
Post by KinkyMong on Nov 28, 2021 20:38:32 GMT
I suspect lexw also thinks the phrase "brevity is the soul of wit" is total bullshit. Literally. Nah, I actually agree with it 100%. Just because you agree with something doesn't mean you possess the means to do it, does it? I think backflips are awesome but I'm pretty sure I'd die if I tried to do one. My issue is: A) I have adult ADHD (mockery/abuse may commence, I get that it's a "funny" disability) so I feel the need to write everything out because otherwise I'll literally (actual literally here) forget what i was going to say. At work this means I have to edit the shit out of any email before sending it lol. B) I have a rather high typing speed, so I can write a huge amount in the time most people can write a moderate or small one. I once had a guy say "What the fuck, did you take two hours to write all that?" (paraphrasing, it was clear he believed it would literally take one multiple hours to write say, 1000 words). It actually took about five minutes and you could see it from the time stamp lol. So I tend to write very long posts where I try to get out all my thinking on something. C) "I didn't have time to write you a short letter, so I wrote you a long one." (Mark Twain, actual quote not a misattribution though he probably stole it). Story of my life mate. Yeah I could edit it down painfully over an hour or two, but... is it worth it when, on the internet, if you actually, honest-to-god, prove a point, support it with evidence and so on, the usual response is that the other person goes away and never talks about it again? I mean that's not a rhetorical question. TL;DR
|
|
MolarAm🔵
Full Member
Bad at games
Posts: 6,869
|
Post by MolarAm🔵 on Nov 28, 2021 22:03:44 GMT
Nah, I actually agree with it 100%. Just because you agree with something doesn't mean you possess the means to do it, does it? I think backflips are awesome but I'm pretty sure I'd die if I tried to do one. My issue is: A) I have adult ADHD (mockery/abuse may commence, I get that it's a "funny" disability) so I feel the need to write everything out because otherwise I'll literally (actual literally here) forget what i was going to say. At work this means I have to edit the shit out of any email before sending it lol. B) I have a rather high typing speed, so I can write a huge amount in the time most people can write a moderate or small one. I once had a guy say "What the fuck, did you take two hours to write all that?" (paraphrasing, it was clear he believed it would literally take one multiple hours to write say, 1000 words). It actually took about five minutes and you could see it from the time stamp lol. So I tend to write very long posts where I try to get out all my thinking on something. C) "I didn't have time to write you a short letter, so I wrote you a long one." (Mark Twain, actual quote not a misattribution though he probably stole it). Story of my life mate. Yeah I could edit it down painfully over an hour or two, but... is it worth it when, on the internet, if you actually, honest-to-god, prove a point, support it with evidence and so on, the usual response is that the other person goes away and never talks about it again? I mean that's not a rhetorical question. TL;DR No it isn't.
|
|
MolarAm🔵
Full Member
Bad at games
Posts: 6,869
|
Post by MolarAm🔵 on Nov 28, 2021 22:14:40 GMT
But seriously, I don't care that much about the tl;dr stuff, I just don't usually read it.
But I agree that you're being a bit needlessly confrontational, in a "excuse me, I must go! someone is wrong on the internet!" kind of way. Like you could make the same points with about 50% less of the heat, and people would (probably) react to it a bit more favourably.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,658
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Nov 29, 2021 9:49:28 GMT
The funny thing is, either he said what he said so fuck him, hes an idiot or the sun completely misquoted him so fuck him, hes an idiot for working with the sun. It turns out, Dear Readers, it was the latter.
|
|
|
Post by simple on Nov 29, 2021 18:47:41 GMT
|
|
lexw
New Member
Posts: 858
|
Post by lexw on Nov 29, 2021 22:04:18 GMT
More likely the opposite. Dorsey was a moron but him fucking around with stuff probably kept Twitter more liberal (by accident rather than intention, he's a libertarian), whereas the technocrat-type who is replacing him may well decide to go with some dubious policy of "balance" (and/or let Trump back on).
But yeah I'm sure the British press will report it as "Twitter gets Woke" or something lol.
I did see a Tweet celebrating the fact that now almost all the big tech companies in the US had Indian (specifically, not South Asian) men in charge of them, as if this were some sort of victory for diversity, rather than showing how racism works.
|
|
|
Post by Danno on Nov 29, 2021 22:06:05 GMT
Reads like a puff piece. Feel a bit sick
|
|
|
Post by 😎 on Nov 29, 2021 22:11:58 GMT
Agrawal rose up through their misinformation tackling project and actively supported the ban of Trump. He's not going to be a friend to the right. They're already gunning for him.
|
|
|
Post by mothercruncher on Nov 29, 2021 22:36:35 GMT
New twitter bloke ought to sort out the interface design chunder before he goes for more minor things like transphobia, misogyny, racism, world peace etc. Unuseable.
|
|
|
Post by simple on Nov 29, 2021 22:49:24 GMT
I don’t think I’ve missed Twitter at all in the two or three years since I gave up on it
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,658
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Nov 29, 2021 23:11:23 GMT
As someone pointed out, his farewell tweet was basically unreadable on mobile which does illustrate how overdue him leaving probably is
|
|
|
Post by Danno on Nov 29, 2021 23:44:31 GMT
As someone pointed out, his farewell tweet was basically unreadable on mobile which does illustrate how overdue him leaving probably is Except he'll still be in some sort of management consultancy role or whatever, that allows him to... allow nazism
|
|
|
Post by Danno on Nov 29, 2021 23:48:58 GMT
I'm drunk and watching cartoons on a Monday night because my job doesn’t have a job description yet and any sort of engagement with the real world might tip me over. Fucking yay.
|
|
|
Post by Danno on Nov 29, 2021 23:49:29 GMT
Literally watching Transformers
|
|
|
Post by Danno on Nov 29, 2021 23:49:56 GMT
Wrong thread. Sorry.
|
|
|
Post by Baines on Nov 30, 2021 4:54:15 GMT
Agrawal rose up through their misinformation tackling project and actively supported the ban of Trump. He's not going to be a friend to the right. They're already gunning for him. The Right in the US still have to be careful about Trump because too much of their voter base believe more in Trump than they do the rest of the leadership. There is also the looming shadow of Trump deciding to run for president again; the Republican Party knows it might have to bend knees to him again in just a couple more years. They might can chip away enough of Trump's support, but it can be risky to try, and some might see better opportunities backing that hypothetical Trump return.
And if Trump does run again, and makes it through as the Republican candidate, I sadly expect that there is a high chance he'll win that second term. I don't think Biden will win a second time, and I'm almost certain the Democratic Party leadership won't actually want to run anyone else who stands a chance. (The American system is very much voting against a candidate rather than voting for, and the Democrats have a tendency to pick candidates that the population as a whole don't particularly want.)
|
|
MolarAm🔵
Full Member
Bad at games
Posts: 6,869
|
Post by MolarAm🔵 on Nov 30, 2021 5:14:21 GMT
I dunno, incumbents generally have an advantage, and usually get re-elected. Trump didn't, but that's because he was extraordinarily unpopular. Biden isn't particularly popular either, but he hasn't plumbed nearly the same depths as Trump did.
Trump would definitely get the Republican nomination if he wanted it, though. Everyone else is too scared of him.
|
|
|
Post by Tonka (🐑,🪤) on Nov 30, 2021 7:23:55 GMT
Trump wouldn't fight fair this time either. The big difference is that he's making sure every state has a sensor that is willing to back his lies.
This time they'll steak the vote.
|
|